PADM 530 Module/Week 6 -- Building the Implementation Plan, Partnerships, and Financing

profileMz Genuine
PADM530DBRubric-2019-20-B1.docx

PADM 530

Discussion Board Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

(70%)

Advanced

92-100%

Proficient

84-91%

Developing

1-83%

Not Present

Total

Key

Components

18.5 to 20 points:

Student addresses all key components of the Discussion Board forum prompt while making specific reference to the required reading, presentations; and, then

probes the interdisciplinary roots of the theories and accompanying inferences as relates to the topic.

Biblical integration is included in a thoughtful manner as articulated in the required reading and presentations.

16.5 to 18 points:

Student addresses most of the key components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt while making specific reference to the required reading and presentations.

Biblical integration is included as articulated in the required reading and presentations.

1 to 16 points:

Student makes specific reference to the required reading and presentations.

Missing key points of Biblical integration.

0 points

Not present

Major Point Support

18.5 to 20 points:

Citations from the required reading and presentation must be included. Student articulates the materials in a way that produces significant insights, incorporating additional reference materials in support of those insights, explaining connections between the assigned material under consideration and other bodies of knowledge, with an eye to identifying missing or otherwise unstated premises that may lead to a new perspective on the topic

16.5 to 18 points:

Citations from the required reading and presentation must be included.

Student goes beyond the obvious by bringing your own beliefs and imagination to bear, while showing further implications of the material given the required reading and presentations.

1 to 16 points:

Missing citations from the required reading and presentation must be included.

While referencing the work of colleagues, student goes beyond the obvious by bringing your own beliefs and reasoning processes to bear.

0 points

Not present

Replies and Discussion

18.5 to 20 points:

There are 2 reply posts. Student responds to key ideas from classmates and builds upon those ideas with new research and analysis. Reply posts move beyond the content discussed in the discussion board thread.

16.5 to 18 points:

There are 2 reply posts. For the most part, student responds to key ideas from classmates and builds upon those ideas with new research and analysis. Reply posts move beyond the content discussed in the discussion board thread.

1 to 16 points:

Missing one reply post and/or student fails to acknowledge key points of classmates’ posts and/or does not move beyond content in the original post.

0 points

Not present

Additional Research

9.25 to 10 points:

Student incorporates the use of outside materials while discussing the interdisciplinary roots of the theories presented.

8.5 to 9 points:

Student conducts a general probe of the interdisciplinary roots of the theories and accompanying inferences.

1 to 8.25 points:

Student identifies a limited number of theories.

0 points

Not present

Structure (30%)

Advanced

92-100%

Proficient

84-91%

Developing

1-83%

Not present

Total

Spelling and Grammar

13.5 to 15 points:

Proper spelling and grammar used.

12.5 to 13 points:

No more than 1-2 spelling or grammar errors present.

1 to 12 points:

3 spelling or grammar errors present

0 points

Not present

Word

Count

13.5 to 15 points:

Thread is at least 600 words for main thread plus 2 independent replies having 200 words per reply

12.5 to 13 points:

Thread is 599-499 words for main thread plus 2 independent replies having less than 200 words per reply

1 to 12 points:

Thread is 498-399 words for main thread plus 2 independent replies having less than 200 words per reply

0 points

Not present

Professor Comments:

Total:

/100