PAD 530 WEEK 5 PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

Analyze the organizational design of the selected agency's human resource management (HRM) in relationship to the entire organization. Assess its strengths and weaknesses.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit an analysis of the organizational design.

Points:

22.75 (13.00%)

Discussed the organizational design relating HRM to only parts of the organization or incompletely assessed its strengths and weaknesses.

Points:

29.75 (17.00%)

Analyzed the organizational design relating HRM to the entire organization incompletely assessing its strengths and weaknesses using evidence to substantiate.

Points:

35 (20.00%)

Analyzed the organizational design relating HRM to the entire organization completely and accurately assessing its strengths and weaknesses using evidence from multiple sources to substantiate.

Analyze at least three of the major components of the agency's human resource system's goals and practices regarding the recruitment and hiring of a qualified workforce.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit an analysis of the major components of the agency’s human resource system’s goals and practices regarding the recruitment and hiring of a qualified workforce.

Points:

22.75 (13.00%)

Discussed less than three components of the agency’s human resource system’s goals and practices regarding the recruitment and hiring of a qualified workforce inaccurately and incompletely.

Points:

29.75 (17.00%)

Discussed three components of the agency’s human resource system’s goals and practices regarding the recruitment and hiring of a qualified workforce but is missing key details.

Points:

35 (20.00%)

Analyzed three of the major components of the agency’s human resource system’s goals and practices regarding the recruitment and hiring of a qualified workforce using multiple sources to substantiate.

Evaluate the agency's approach to training and programs provided for new and existing employees for the development of knowledge, skills, and overall competencies, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not evaluate the agency’s approach to training and programs provided for new and existing employees for the development of knowledge, skills and over all competencies.

Points:

22.75 (13.00%)

Stated the agency’s approach to training and programs provided for new and existing employees for the development of knowledge, skills, and overall competencies, did not discuss the strengths and weaknesses.

Points:

29.75 (17.00%)

Evaluated the agency’s approach to training and programs provided for new and existing employees for the development of knowledge, skills, and overall competencies, discussing the strengths and weaknesses without much detail.

Points:

35 (20.00%)

Evaluated the agency’s approach to training and programs provided for new and existing employees for the development of knowledge, skills, and overall competencies, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses.

Recommend at least two actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of recruiting and training a qualified workforce.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not recommend any actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of recruiting and training a qualified workforce.

Points:

22.75 (13.00%)

Recommended only one action the agency could take to improve in the areas of recruiting and training a qualified workforce.

Points:

29.75 (17.00%)

Recommended two relevant actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of recruiting and training a qualified workforce.

Points:

35 (20.00%)

Recommended two relevant and feasible actions the agency could take to improve in the areas of recruiting and training a qualified workforce.

Use four sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

No sources provided.

Points:

11.375 (6.50%)

Provided less than three quality sources; most references are not peer reviewed, academic references.

Points:

14.875 (8.50%)

Provided four quality sources; some or all references are peer reviewed, academic references.

Points:

17.5 (10.00%)

Provided more than four quality sources; all references are peer reviewed, academic references.

Produced writing that is clear, well-organized, and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Produced writing that has noticeable issues with clarity, organization, and the application of SWS style or SWS was not applied. Errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling detract from readability. Overall, errors are major (8–9) and have definite impact on the ability of the reader to understand the writing.

Points:

11.375 (6.50%)

Produced writing that attempts to be clear, well-organized, and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains some errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Overall, errors are moderate (6–7) and have some impact ability of the reader to understand the writing.

Points:

14.875 (8.50%)

Produced writing that is clear, well-organized, and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling. There may be minor errors (4–5) but they do not impact the ability of the reader to understand the writing.

Points:

17.5 (10.00%)

Produced writing that is clear, well-organized, and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Errors are minimal (0–3).