PAD 520 Policy Analysis and Programs

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

Develops a summary that encapsulates the three most powerful ideas on policy evaluation.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely developed a summary that encapsulates your selection of the three most powerful ideas on policy evaluation.

Points:

25.875 (22.50%)

Partially developed a summary that encapsulates your selection of the three most powerful ideas on policy evaluation.

Points:

29.325 (25.50%)

Satisfactorily developed a summary that encapsulates your selection of the three most powerful ideas on policy evaluation.

Points:

34.5 (30.00%)

Thoroughly developed a summary that encapsulates your selection of the three most powerful ideas on policy evaluation.

Describes the three most powerful ideas in detail.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely described your selection of the three most powerful ideas in detail.

Points:

25.875 (22.50%)

Partially described your selection of the three most powerful ideas in detail.

Points:

29.325 (25.50%)

Satisfactorily described your selection of the three most powerful ideas in detail.

Points:

34.5 (30.00%)

Thoroughly described your selection of the three most powerful ideas in detail.

Discusses why you selected them and how they will likely assist a policy analyst.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely discussed why you selected them and how they will likely assist a policy analyst.

Points:

25.875 (22.50%)

Partially discussed why you selected them and how they will likely assist a policy analyst.

Points:

29.325 (25.50%)

Satisfactorily discussed why you selected them and how they will likely assist a policy analyst.

Points:

34.5 (30.00%)

Thoroughly discussed why you selected them and how they will likely assist a policy analyst.

Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

More than 6 errors present.

Points:

8.625 (7.50%)

5–6 errors present.

Points:

9.775 (8.50%)

3–4 errors present.

Points:

11.5 (10.00%)

0–2 errors present.