Movie Review-Courageous

profilemercedesbenz2020
PACO506MovieReviewAssignmentGradingRubric1.docx

PACO 506 Movie Review Assignment Grading Rubric – 100 points total

Levels of Achievement

Criteria

Advanced –

Satisfies Criteria

with Excellence

Proficient –

Satisfies Most Criteria

Developing –

Satisfies Criteria Incompletely

Below Expectations –

Does Not Satisfy Criteria

Not Present

Points Earned

Content

70%

(70 pts)

65 – 70 pts

59 – 64 pts

53 – 58 pts

1 – 52 pts

0 pts

Summary (24 pts)

22 – 24 pts

Summary is concisely worded, approximately one full page in length, and provides a complete review of the movie’s plot, as well as identifying and explaining aspects that warrant reflection. Christian worldview implications and/or biblical themes and principles are duly noted.

21 pts

Summary is limited, less than one full page in length, and provides a partial review of the movie’s plot. Aspects that warrant reflection are only partially identified and explained. Christian worldview implications and/or themes and principles are limited.

19 – 20 pts

Summary is incomplete, poorly worded, and is less than half a page in length. Aspects that warrant reflection are minimally identified and explained or missing altogether. Minimal Christian worldview implications and/or themes and principles are included.

1 – 18 pts

Summary is incomplete or missing altogether. Aspects that warrant reflection are not clearly identified and explained or missing altogether. No Christian worldview implications and/or themes and principles are included.

Not Present

Therapeutic Implications (23 pts)

22 – 23 pts

Specific scenes in the movie that have value for use in a counseling setting are appropriately identified and explained, concisely worded, and at least one full page in length. Adequate rationale for selecting these scenes is provided. Christian worldview implications and/or biblical themes and principles are duly noted and incorporated.

20 – 21 pts

Specific scenes in the movie that have value for use in a counseling setting are only partially identified with limited explanation, and is less than one full page in length. Only partial rationale for selecting these scenes is provided. Christian worldview implications and/or biblical themes and principles are limited and only partially incorporated.

18 – 19 pts

Specific scenes in the movie that have value for use in a counseling setting are only minimally identified and explained, and is less than half a page in length. Minimal rationale for selecting these scenes is provided. Christian worldview implications and/or biblical themes and principles are minimally noted.

1 – 17 pts

Specific scenes in the movie that have value for use in a counseling setting are only minimally identified or missing altogether. No clear rationale for selecting these scenes is provided. Christian worldview implications and/or biblical themes and principles are not incorporated at all.

Personal and Professional Implications (23 pts)

22 – 23 pts

Personal reflection on the content of the movie is offered, concisely worded, at least one full page in length. Perceptions related to counseling are confirmed or challenged. Personal impact on the delivery of therapeutic services is identified. Areas of agreement or disagreement on specific scenes are duly noted. Christian worldview implications and/or biblical themes and principles are duly noted and incorporated.

20 – 21 pts

Personal reflection on the content of the movie is partially offered and less than one full page in length. Perceptions related to counseling are only partially confirmed or challenged. Personal impact on the delivery of therapeutic services is partially identified or incomplete. Areas of agreement or disagreement on specific scenes are partially noted or incomplete. Christian worldview implications and/or biblical themes and principles are limited and only partially incorporated.

18 – 19 pts

Personal reflection on the content of the movie is limited and is less than one full page in length. Perceptions related to counseling are minimally confirmed/challenged. Personal impact on the delivery of therapeutic services is minimally identified. Areas of agreement or disagreement on specific scenes are minimally noted. Christian worldview implications and/or biblical themes and principles are minimally noted.

1 – 17 pts

Personal reflection on the content of the movie is missing altogether. Perceptions related to counseling are missing altogether. Personal impact on the delivery of therapeutic services is missing altogether. Areas of agreement or disagreement on specific scenes are missing altogether. Christian worldview implications and/or biblical themes and principles are not incorporated at all.

Criteria

Advanced –

Satisfies Criteria

with Excellence

Proficient –

Satisfies Most Criteria

Developing –

Satisfies Criteria Incompletely

Below Expectations –

Does Not Satisfy Criteria

Not present

Points Earned

Structure

30%

(30 pts)

28 – 30 pts

26 – 27 pts

23 – 25 pts

1 – 22 pts

0 pts

Grammar, Spelling and Punctuation

(16 pts)

15 – 16 pts

Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.

14 pts

Some errors with spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Sentences are complete. Paragraphs contain some varied sentence structures.

13 pts

Spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors distract. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs are poorly formed.

1 – 12 pts

Significant grammatical errors are present with little or no evidence of proofing. Paragraphs are poorly formed.

0 points

Not present

Writing Style Formatting (14 pts)

13 – 14 pts

Review is correctly formatted, has appropriate headings, and is at least three pages in length. References and in-text citations are in correct format and use the correct writing style.

12 pts

Review has mostly correct formatting and complete headings, but is less than three pages in length. Where applicable, references and in-text citations have nearly accurate formatting and use the correct writing style.

11 pts

Review is minimally/not correctly formatted, is missing appropriate headings, and is less than two pages in length. Where applicable, references and in-text citations are minimally/not correctly formatted and do not use the correct writing style.

1 – 10 pts

Review lacks flow, is not correctly formatted, is missing appropriate headings, and is 1.5 pages or less in length. Where applicable, references and in-text citations are minimally or not in correct format and/or are missing altogether.

0 points

Not present

Total

Advanced

92 – 100 pts

Proficient

84 – 91 pts

Developing

76 – 83 pts

Below Expectations

1 – 75 pts

0

Professor’s

Comments