Solving My People Puzzle

Criteria

Advanced 92-100 (A- to A):

Satisfies criteria w/ excellence

Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+) :

Satisfies Criteria

Developing 76-83 (C- to C+):

Satisfies most criteria

Below Expectations 1-75

(F to D+):

Does not satisfy criteria

Not Present

Points

Earned

Content: 125 pts

Q#1: Guiding Purpose Statement

10 pts.

GPS is concise and clearly provides a primary and functional description of being and becoming more Christlike in a specific way in a specific relational context.

9 pts.

GPS provides a primary and functional description of being and becoming more Christlike in a specific way in a specific relational context.

8 pts.

GPS is confusing and does not demonstrate an understanding of primary and functional purpose.

The focus seems to be more on doing than being & becoming.

1-7 pts.

Attempts to draft a GPS, but is undeveloped and lacks integration of primary and functional purpose.

0 points

Q#2: DISC Description

14-15 pts.

Provides concise, thoughtful DISC description about “This is Me!” and “This is Expected of Me”.

13 pts.

Provides thoughtful DISC description about “This is Me!” and “This is Expected of Me”.

12 pts.

Provides insufficent DISC description about “This is Me!” and “This is Expected of Me”.

1-11 pts.

Effort made to describe “This is Me” and “This is Expected of Me”, but weak and undeveloped.

0 points

Q#3: DISC Alignment

55-60 pts.

Provides significant insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and clearly shifts alignment with each of the primary DISC styles.

51-54 pts.

Provides insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and shifts alignment with each of the primary DISC styles.

46-50 pts.

Provides insights about his/her relational style but with insufficient detail. Weakly developed alignment with each of the primary DISC styles.

1-45 pts.

Effort made to work with relational alignment, but weak and undeveloped, as well as unsubstantiated.

0 points

Q#4: Communicating & Connecting

with Careseeker

14-15 pts.

Provides significant insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and clearly shifts alignment with careseeker’s primary DISC style.

13 pts.

Provides insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and shifts alignment with careseeker’s primary DISC style.

12 pts

Provides insights about his/her relational style but with insufficient detail. Weakly developed alignment with the careseeker’s primary DISC style.

1-11 pts.

Effort made to work with careseeker’s relational alignment, but weak and undeveloped, as well as unsubstantiated.

0 points

Q#5:

Communicating & Connecting

with Mentor

14-15 pts.

Provides significant insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and clearly shifts alignment with mentor’s primary DISC style.

13 pts.

Provides insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and shifts alignment with mentor’s primary DISC style.

12 pts

Provides insights about his/her relational style but with insufficient detail. Weakly developed alignment with the mentor’s primary DISC style.

1-11 pts.

Effort made to work with mentor’s relational alignment, but weak and undeveloped, as well as unsubstantiated.

.

0 points

Conclusion

10 pts

The assignment includes a clear, cohesive conclusion that presents a convincing closing argument for the assignment’s “So What of it all?!”

9 pts

The assignment includes a general conclusion that presents a closing argument for the assignment’s “So What of it all?!”

8 pts

The assignment includes a partial conclusion summarizing the assignment.

1-7 pts

The assignment includes an insufficient conclusion.

0 points

Structure: 25 pts

Organization

14-15 pts.

All required elements (7 sources) are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. The paper meets the page length requirement.

13 pts.

All required elements (7 sources) are included, but organization of writing needs work. The paper meets the page length requirement.

12 pts.

Most required elements are included, but not well organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.

1–11 pts.

Few or no required elements are included. Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. There may not be a logical treatment of the material. The paper does not meet the page length requirement.

0 points

Style

and

Format

10 pts.

The paper properly uses current form/style. Proper headings, in-text citations or footnotes, and references or bibliography are formatted correctly. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.

9 pts.

The paper consistently uses current form/style. Proper headings, in-text citations or footnotes, and references or bibliography are formatted with few or no errors. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and grammar errors.

8 pts.

The paper inconsistently uses form/style. Headings, in-text citations or footnotes, and references or bibliography are inconsistently formatted. The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

1-7 pts.

The paper erroneously uses or does not use form/style. Headings, in-text citations or footnotes, and references or bibliography are erroneously formatted or not present. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

0 points

Total

/150

Instructor’s comments: