|
Criteria
|
Advanced 92-100 (A- to A):
Satisfies criteria w/ excellence
|
Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+) :
Satisfies Criteria
|
Developing (C- to C+):
Satisfies most criteria
|
Below Expectations (F to D+):
Does not satisfy criteria
|
Not Present
|
Points
Earned
|
|
Thread
|
65-70 pts.
· All key components of the Meaning-Making Forum prompt are answered in the thread.
· The thread has a clear, logical flow. All major points are stated clearly.
· All major points are supported by required evidence-based sources/readings-to-date and good examples or thoughtful analysis.
|
59-64 pts.
· All key components of the Meaning-Making Forum prompt are answered in the thread.
· The thread has a logical flow. Most major points are stated.
· Most major points are supported by required evidence-based sources/readings-to-date and examples or analysis.
|
53-58 pts.
· The Meaning-Making Forum prompt is addressed.
· The thread lacks flow and content. Major points are unclear or confusing.
· Major points include minimal examples or analysis.
|
1-52 pts.
· The Meaning-Making Forum prompt is addressed minimally or not at all.
· The thread lacks content. Major points are unclear, confusing or not discussed at all.
· Major points are not supported by examples or analysis.
|
0 points
|
|
|
Reply
|
16.5-17.5 pts.
· One Reply via Quote tool directly addresses a specific point of reference within a related thread.
· The reply is a significant contribution supported by at least 1 required evidence-based source/reading-to-date, reflects thoughtful analysis of subject matter and thread.
|
15.5 pts.
· One Reply via Quote tool addresses a point of reference within a related thread.
· The reply is a contribution supported by at least 1 required evidence-based source/reading-to-date, reflects analysis of subject matter and thread.
|
13.5-14.5 pts.
· One Reply without Quote tool addresses a related thread.
· The reply lacks flow and content. Reply is unclear or confusing.
|
1-12.5 pts.
· One Reply without Quote tool marginally addresses a related thread.
· The reply lacks relevancy or clarity.
|
0 points
|
|
|
Organization / Style/Sources
|
23-25 pts.
· The thread is presented with appropriate headings in bold, annotated outline with concise sentences, and organizational clarity.
· Thread’s minimum word count exceeds 450 words.
· The reply contains a salutation and exceeds 150 word count.
· Required number of sources/readings-to-date are employed; follows current APA standards or Turabian Form without format errors.
|
21-22 pts.
· The thread is presented with most headings in bold, annotated outline with sentences, but slightly lacking organizational clarity.
· Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is met.
· The reply contains a salutation and meets or exceeds 150 word count.
· All but two of the required number of sources/readings-to-date are employed; follows current APA standards or Turabian Form with minimal format errors.
|
19-20 pts.
· The thread is presented with partial headings, without annotated outline and/or clear sentences, and/or lacks organizational clarity.
· Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is met.
· The reply does not contain a salutation and/or meet 150 word count.
· All but three of the required number of sources/readings-to-date are employed; reflects several errors related to current APA standards or Turabian Form.
|
1-18 pts.
· The thread is presented without headings and/or clear sentences, and lacks organizational clarity.
· Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is not met or exceeded.
· The reply does not contain a salutation and does not meet 150 word count.
· All but four of the required number of sources/readings-to-date are employed; reflects many errors related to current APA standards or Turabian Form.
|
0 points
|
|
|
Grammar/
Spelling
|
11.5-12.5 pts.
· Spelling, grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
· Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.
|
9.5-10.5 pts.
· Sentences are reasonably complete, clear, and concise. Minor issues with proofreading/editing are noted.
· Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.
|
8.5 pts.
· Sentences are less complete, clear, and concise. More pervasive / significant issues with proofreading / editing are noted.
· Paragraphs marginally contain appropriately varied sentence structures.
|
1-7.5 pts.
· Writing is not at the graduate level. It was clear that the work had not been edited or proofread. Multiple issues are noted.
· Run-on paragraphs are observed. Sentence structure is not varied.
|
0 points
|
|
mercedesbenz2020
PACO500_Meaning-Making_Forum1-4_Rubric_202030B2.docx
0
