IST 309
1
PA 315: WINTER 2019
GOVERNMENT-BUSINESS RELATIONS
CLASS: FULLY ONLINE
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO
PROFESSOR SHARON VELARDE PIERCE
PHONE: 909-537-5758
EMAIL: [email protected]
OFFICE: JB 549
ADDRESS: Department of Public Administration, 5500 University Parkway,
San Bernardino, CA 92407-2397
OFFICE HOURS: Tuesdays 2:00-6:00 PM via Zoom or by appointment
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
The course examines government policies affecting business development at local, state and
national levels. It discusses major international trade treaties, trading blocs, and international
financial institutions and the impact of globalization on government's involvement with business.
Issues regarding governance, planning and economic development will be addressed along
with topics of international trade regimes. Topics also covered include the ethical implications of
government-business interactions and roles; and its applications to the government-business
relations. One of the most important parts of the course represents the detailed discussion of
the ethical implications of government-business interactions.
Course Learning Objectives:
This course targets several important objectives.
1. Students will develop a knowledge base regarding the foundation, concepts, principles and
facts regarding government-business interactions.
Evaluated through discussions, quizzes, writing assignments and ethics research paper.
2. Students will develop clear understandings of the value and significance of ethics and
corporate social responsibility within the context of government-business interactions.
Evaluated through discussions, quizzes, exams, writing assignments and ethics research
paper.
3. Students will be able to identify and argue the rationale behind the most important models and
theories of government-business relations.
Evaluated through discussions and writing assignments.
4. Students will be able to analyze local and regional macroeconomic ramifications of
government and business interactions, with a specific focus on sustainable, strategic and
economic development.
Evaluated through discussions, writing assignments and presentation.
5. Students will develop the ability to adapt and apply theoretical reasoning to understanding the
historical evolution of government-business interactions in particular on such matters as
delivery of public goods, business support, partnerships, outsourcing, contracting out as well
as collaboration in terms of regulation design and compliance.
Evaluated through discussions, writing assignments and ethics research paper.
2
6. Student will develop a practical understanding of the global ramifications of government-
business relations within the context of international institutions and such dynamics as
globalization
Evaluated through in discussions, writing assignment and globalization reflective essay.
7. Students will improve their critical analysis, presentation, writing and communication skills.
Evaluated through discussions, writing assignments and presentation.
8. Professional behavior and responsibility.
Evaluated through course interaction, discussion and presentation.
COURSE TEXT AND MATERIALS:
• Textbook: Building Business-Government Relations: A Skills Approach, 2016 Routledge,
ISBN: 9780765640086.
• Additional required readings/videos can be accessed from Blackboard under the various
Modules.
Class Structure and Grading Scheme:
General Class Expectations:
Students are expected to complete the required readings for module. Given that discussions
represent a critical component of the course it is imperative that students are prepared. One will
not receive a positive grade for the course if one does not complete all of the required readings.
Interaction and participation are very important.
Classroom with Web Component Course:
This is a “Classroom with Web Component” course. You must have an adequate Internet
connection or use campus student computer centers for full participation in the course. Blackboard
supports the course (https://blackboard.csusb.edu) and must be checked daily for announcements
and course information. Students are responsible for an active CSUSB email address associated
with Blackboard throughout the course.
Course Assignments and Weights:
Final class grades will be determined with the following breakdowns:
• Weekly Writing Assignments (9 weeks at 10 points) 90
• Weekly Quizzes (9 quizzes at 5 points) 45
• Ethics Research Paper 10
• Economic Development Case Study Paper 10
• Economic Development Case Study Presentation 10
• Globalization Reflective Essay 10
• Final Exam 25
Total points = 200
GRADING SYSTEM
There are 200 total points for the course.
Grades will be given based on the following point-grade scale:
3
190 - 200 A
180 - 189 A -
174 - 179 B +
166 - 173 B
160 - 165 B -
154 - 159 C +
146 - 153 C
140- 145 C -
134 - 139 D +
126 - 133 D
120 - 125 D -
124 or less F
Incompletes are given at the discretion of the instructor and only with documented circumstances.
ASSIGNMENTS:
All written assignments must follow APA style and format. Abstracts are not required.
Weekly Writing Assignments: Due weekly
Students will be required to complete a weekly writing assignment that will require critical
thinking, reflection and application of learned materials. Writing prompts are provided in each
module. Each writing assignment is worth up to 10 points.
Weekly Writing Assignment Rubric
Criteria Meeting Course
Expectations
(10 - 9 points)
Close to Course
Expectations
Very Good
(8.9 – 7 points)
Below Course
Expectations
Acceptable
(6.9 - 5 points)
Not Meeting Course
Expectations Unacceptable (4.9 - 0 points)
Content Understanding.
Fulfilling the
requirements of the
writing assignment
prompt.
Clear and accurate answers; insightful,
specific. Deals fully with all elements of
the writing assignment prompt. The
student understands main ideas
relevant to the materials provided in the
module. The student correctly uses
terminology and topic related
information. The student demonstrates
appropriate use of examples.
Information and knowledge are
accurate. Meets or exceeds word count. Overall, exceptional paper.
Ideas and
arguments are
relatively clear.
Some terminology is
used correctly. The
student understands
most main ideas
relevant to the
materials provided in
the module. Meets
word count. Overall,
good paper.
The student uses
most of topic
vocabulary
incorrectly. The
student shows little
mastery of main
ideas relevant to the
materials provided in
the module. Meets
word count. Overall,
poorly written paper.
Gives little
indication that the
readings were
completed. Does
not meet word
count.
4
Language & Communication Quality
The student uses correct vocabulary and
syntax. The student demonstrates
mastery of academic English without
grammatical errors.
The student uses
everyday vocabulary.
Statements not always
clearly constructed.
There is occasional
vocabulary, spelling
and syntax errors.
The student uses
language that makes it difficult for others to
understand. Language is abstract
or trite. There are
frequent vocabulary
and syntax errors.
Student fails to
express oneself
appropriately.
Others cannot
understand what
is being said.
There are many
vocabulary and
syntax errors.
Weekly Quizzes: Due weekly
There will be nine quizzes in this course. The format for each quiz may include multiple choice
and true/false questions and will be designed to test recall and application of information
covered in the textbook and readings. The quizzes will cover all assigned weekly readings
and material covered for the week assigned. You will have 60 minutes to complete the quiz.
Each quiz is worth up to 5 points.
Ethics Research Paper: Due Sunday, February 2nd no later than 11:59 pm Students will
have to identify and analyze an ethical dilemma related to the government business
interaction. Write a 750 – 1000 words, double-spaced paper, and APA style. Students are
expected to identify the key stakeholders, discussion the implications of the ethical dilemma,
and identify available solutions through recommendations.
Each paper should have the following sections (and only these sections):
• Introduction
• The ethical dilemma
• Stakeholders
• Case Study Questions
• Your recommendations
• References
Instruction for the Online Assignment: go to Ethics Research Paper Directions and
Submission click View/Complete Assignment # you may either type in the Comments
box or attach a file of your essay click Save (will save your file and you can go back and
modify your essay) click Submit.
This assignment will be graded based on the following rubric:
Ethics Research Paper Rubric
Criteria Exceptional (10-9 points)
Very Good (8.9 – 7.5 points)
Acceptable (7.4 – 5 points)
Unacceptable (4.9 points or less)
Stakeholders Identification of key
stakeholders and their
responsibilities to the
public in the situation
Identification of all stakeholders
and clear articulation of their
responsibilities to the public in
the situation involved
Identification of all key
stakeholders and their
responsibilities to the
public in the situation
involved
Identification of some key
stakeholders and/or their
responsibilities to the public in
the situation involved
Failure to identify key
stakeholders and/or
their responsibilities to
the public in the
situation involved
5
Values Articulation of ethical
dilemma and
competing values in
the business
situation
Clear articulation of the ethical
dilemmas and identification of
all issues and values involved in
the situation
Correct identification and
description of the ethical
dilemma and the major
tradeoffs of competing
values
Some understanding of the
general ethical dilemma and
the major tradeoffs of
competing values
Little or no
understanding of the
general ethical dilemma
and the major tradeoffs
of competing values
Solutions Provision of feasible
and effective solution(s) to resolve
the ethical problem
Recommending the most
feasible course of action that
would resolve the ethical
problem most effectively under
the circumstances
Recommending a
feasible course of action
that would resolve the
ethical problem
effectively
Recommending a course of action that is
workable, but less effective
than other options/solutions
Failure to recommend
or recommending a
course of action that is
neither feasible nor
effective
Writing Word choice,
sentence variety,
grammar,
punctuation, and
spelling
Choice of language and sentence structure; precise and purposeful, demonstrating a command of language and variety of sentence structures; control of conventions; contribute to the writer’s ability to communicate purpose; free of
most mechanical errors
Competent use of language and sometimes varies sentence structure; generally focused; occasional errors do not interfere with writer’s ability to communicate purpose
Developing agility in language use, sometimes uses weak vocabulary or inappropriate usage or word choice; sentences structure tends to be pedestrian and often repetitious; errors interfere with the ability to communicate purpose
Displays frequent and
fundamental errors in
vocabulary; sentences
may be simplistic and
disjointed; errors
interfere with writer’s ability to consistently
communicate purpose;
pervasive mechanical
errors obscure meaning
Economic Development Case Study Paper and Presentation: Due Sunday, February 16th
no later than 11:59 pm
The Economic Development Case Study a two-part assignment – the written paper and
video presentation. Economic Development Case studies must be posted prior to
January 19th to receive approval. Case studies are approved on first posted basis – case
studies must be unique, and students are required to review previously posted case studies
to alleviate duplicate case studies.
The first part of the assignment is to write a paper on a local (San Bernardino or Riverside
counties) economic development. You may identify a case as reported from a city’s website,
local newspapers, or other quality source. Remember, a low-quality source, or insufficient
information from your sources, will affect the quality of your grade for this assignment. The
Economic Development project cannot have been completed.
Your case study should be approximately 750~1000 words long. In your case study paper,
you should briefly describe the following:
• Introduction to the economic development case
• Identify the role government played
• Identify the role of the public, if any
• Economic impact to the community – What is the economic impact to the
community? How will it benefit or not benefit the community?
• Analysis – What is your analysis of the project?
• Conclusion – Where is the project currently?
6
Instructions for the case study: go to Economic Development Case Study – Submit Here
click View and Complete type in your information, case study title and your content
click Upload.
Scoring Rubric for Economic Development Case Study Paper Criteria Exceptional
(10-9 points) Very Good
(8.9 – 7.5 points) Acceptable (7.4 – 5 points)
Unacceptable (4.9 points or less)
Content
Provides an accurate and
complete description of
the case. All sources of
facts and examples fully
documented
For the most part, description of
the case is accurate and complete.
Most sources of facts and examples documented.
Description of the case is inaccurate or incomplete.
Some sources of facts and examples documented.
No reference is
made to the case.
Organization
Writer presents information in
logical, interesting sequence, which
reader can follow
Writer presents information in
logical sequence which reader can
follow.
Reader has difficulty following
case study because
it jumps around
Reader cannot
understand the
case study
because there is
no consistent flow
of information.
Analysis
Writer provides excellent
analysis of the role of
government and the
economic impact of the
case supported by
information provided
Writer provides good analysis of
the role of government and the
economic impact of the case.
Writer provides analysis
of either the role of
government or the economic impact of the
case, but not both
Limited analysis of
the role of government and the
economic impact
Language & Communication
Quality
The student uses correct
vocabulary and syntax.
The student demonstrates
mastery of academic
English without
grammatical errors
The student uses everyday
vocabulary. Statements and
arguments are not always clearly
constructed. There is occasional
vocabulary, spelling and syntax
errors
The student uses
language that makes it
difficult for others to
understand. Language is
abstract or trite. There are
frequent vocabulary and
syntax errors.
Student fails to
express oneself
appropriately. Others
cannot understand
what is being said.
There are many
vocabulary and
syntax errors.
Length of case
study
About 750~1000 words
with substantially all
material covered and little
extraneous material.
Over 1000 words or less than 750 words with most of topic
appropriately covered
Over 1200 words or less
than 500 words; too much
extraneous material,
verbosity or incomplete
coverage
Over 1400 words or
less than 350 words. Overly extraneous or
incomplete
Economic Development Case Study Presentation: Due no later than 11:59 pm on February 16th. The second part of the Economic Development Case Study is to create a presentation (PowerPoint, Prezi,
etc.) and create a video of the presentation. The time frame should be seven to ten minutes in length. If a
video is embedded within the presentation, it cannot be longer than one minute.
7
Scoring Rubric for Economic Development Case Study Presentation
Criteria Exceptional (10-
9 points) Very Good (8.9 – 7.5 points)
Acceptable (7.4 – 5 points)
Unacceptable (4.9 points or less)
Subject
Knowledge Student demonstrate full
knowledge (more than
required) by answering all
assignment outline and
case study
Student is at ease and followed the
assignment outline and is knowledgeable about the
economic development case study
Student is uncomfortable
with information; student
followed some of the
assignment outline
Student does not
have grasp of
information; student
did not follow
assignment outline
Organization Student presents information in logical,
interesting sequence
which the audience can
follow
Student presents information in
logical sequence which audience
can follow
Audience has difficulty
following presentation
because student jumps
around
Audience cannot
understand
presentation
because there is no
sequence of
information Mechanics Presentation has no
misspellings or
grammatical errors
Presentation has no more than two
misspellings and/ or grammatical
errors
Presentation has three
misspellings and/or
grammatical errors
Presentation has
four or more
spelling errors
and/or grammatical
errors Graphics Student’s graphics
explain and reinforce
screen text and
presentation
Student’s graphics relate to text and
presentation Student occasionally uses
graphics that rarely support
text and presentation
Student uses
superfluous
graphics or no
graphics Elocution /
Eye Contact Student uses a clear
voice and maintains eye
contact, seldom using
notes
Student’s voice is clear. Student
maintains eye contact most of the
time but frequently returns to notes
Student’s voice is low. Student occasionally uses
eye contact, but still reads
most of report
Student mumbles
and speaks too
quietly. Student
reads all of report
with no eye contact.
Length of
Presentation Around ten minutes long Seven to ten minutes long Less than seven minutes
long Less than five
minutes long
Globalization Reflective Essay: Due Sunday, March 1st no later than 11:59 p.m.
Please answer the following question in a 500 - 750 word essay. This assignment is meant to be a
reflective essay on the impact of globalization. APA style is required for this assignment.
Please upload your assignment to the link under “GLOBALIZATION REFLECTIVE ESSAY”. Essay
is worth 10 points.
ESSAY PROMPT:
Explain the impact of globalization on your own life and your country (provide specific examples). Provide examples of evidence of changes. Consider how modernization and growth has affected your consumption behavior and your thoughts. Do you support globalization why or why not?
Essay will be graded as follows:
9-10 points = Excellent paper is well written, clearly answers the items for the assignment. 7-8 points = Good paper but has errors in the writing. 5-6 points = Fine job but has writing errors and there are some issues with the analysis. 3-4 points = Poor job that does not show pride in work or that time and effort was spent.
8
1-2 points = Turned in something but does not meet the requirements at all
0 points = Missing
EXTRA CREDIT: This is the ONLY extra credit opportunity and is worth up to 4 points. No additional extra credit will be provided. Extra Credit: Introduction Post (up to 4 points): Create a post of a minimum of 350 – 500 words introducing
yourself. Please include information about your hobbies, work situation, your major and why you chose it,
future goals after college, and at least one topic of interest regarding the course. Please attach at least one
personal picture (if you do not feel comfortable sharing your personal picture, you may substitute it with any
picture that is related to your life. By Sunday, January 12th, 2020 no later than 11:59 pm.
Final Exam: Open from Friday, March 13th through Wednesday, March 18th, 2020.
The final consists of an open book multiple choice and one essay exam. It is a timed exam and
will be two hours in length. Do not leave your test until the last minute. You are strongly
encouraged to begin your exam no later than 6 hours before it is due. If you encounter computer
or internet failure during your test, it is your responsibility to have a backup plan (school
computer lab, library etc).
Note: Accommodations will be made as necessary for students with disabilities. Please speak to me
at the beginning of the course to make me aware of extenuating circumstances.
Late Assignments:
Late assignments will not be accepted. Please provide ample time to complete assignments to
ensure you turn in your assignments before the deadline. No exceptions.
Assignments and Blackboard: Assignments will only be accepted through Blackboard.
Assignments sent via email will not be accepted. No exceptions.
Critical Due Dates:
Assignment Due Date Note
Weekly Quizzes Weekly Quizzes located in each module.
Weekly Writing Assignments Weekly Writing assignments located in each module.
Extra Credit – Introduction Post
Sunday, January 12th –
11:59 pm Individual post submitted online
Economic Case Study Approval Sunday, January 19th no later than 11:59 pm
Thread will be posted on Blackboard.
Ethical Case Study Sunday, February 2nd – 11:59 pm
Essay to be submitted online
Economic Development Case
Study Paper AND Presentation Sunday, February 16th –
11:59 pm Case study paper and Video presentation to
be submitted online
9
Globalization
Reflective Essay
Sunday, March 1st – 11:59
pm Individual post submitted online
Final Exam Available between Friday, March 13th through
Wednesday, March 18th.
To be taken online. Timed exam.
SCHEDULE OF READINGS AND ASSIGNMENTS:
Students are expected to keep current with the readings and be prepared to complete weekly
assignments.
This syllabus is subject to change. Changes, if any, will be announced and an updated syllabus
will be posted on Blackboard. Students will be held responsible for all changes presented.
Module 1: January 4th – January 12th
Introduction to class, syllabus, assignments, and Blackboard
Comparing the Roles of Business and Government
• What is Economic Development?
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 1
• What is due:
o Introduction (only extra credit opportunity)
o Weekly Writing Assignment
o Weekly Quiz
Module 2: January 13th – January 19th
Theories about Business – Government Relations in Society
Historical and general background on government: 5 eras
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 2
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 3
• What is due:
o Weekly Writing Assignment
o Weekly Quiz
o Choose an Economic Development in the Inland Empire.
Module 3: January 20th – January 26th
Government as Regulator of Business: Protection of Consumer, Employee & Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Ethics
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 5
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 6
• “Inside the Meltdown” movie – The Financial Crisis and Bailout of 2008-2009
• What is due:
o Weekly Writing Assignment
o Weekly Quiz
10
Module 4: January 27th – February 2nd
Business’s Involvement in Government
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 7
• What is due:
o Weekly Writing Assignment
o Weekly Quiz
o Ethical Case Study Analysis Paper
Module 5: February 3rd – February 9th
Economic Development
Industrial Recruitment
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 8
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 9
• What is due:
o Weekly Writing Assignment
o Weekly Quiz
Module 6: February 10th – February 16th
• What is due:
o Weekly Writing Assignment
o Weekly Quiz
o Economic Development Papers
o Economic Development Presentations
Module 7: February 17th – February 23rd
Public Entrepreneurs and Privatization
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 10
• What is due:
o Weekly Writing Assignment
o Weekly Quiz
Module 8: February 24th – March 1st
Globalization and Free Trade
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 11
• What is due:
o Weekly Writing Assignment
o Weekly Quiz
o Globalization Reflection Due
Module 9: March 2nd – March 8th
Examples of and Challenges for Trade Regimes in the World
Business and Global Governance
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 12
11
• Ni & Van Wart, Chapter 13
• What is due:
o Weekly Writing Assignment
o Weekly Quiz
Module 10: March 9th – March 20th
• What is due:
o Final Exam
COURSE APPS
Remind App: In addition to Blackboard, I will be using a free application called “Remind” to
send reminders (e.g., upcoming due dates), announcements, and other important information.
Instructions for joining - Get the app by searching “remind 101” on your app store then join with a
class code: pa315w. You can also join by texting @pa315w to 81010. You can also visit
https://help.remind.com/hc/enus/articles/203179887-How-do-I- join-a-class- for a Quick Start
Guide. This service is optional (i.e., students are not required to sign up for “Remind”); however,
it is strongly encouraged. After joining, you can choose to receive reminder messages via text,
email, or push notification to the mobile app (or any combination of these). “Remind” protects the
privacy of the students and instructor by keeping their phone number hidden during messaging.
All personal information is kept private. Instructors will never see your phone number, nor will you
see theirs.
ACADEMIC HONESTY
Students are expected to be familiar with California State University, San Bernardino’s policy on
cheating and plagiarism. Any violations of academic honesty will result in a failing grade in the
class. Violations will be forwarded to the University for appropriate action. Joint/group responses
are not allowed in any written work in this class. All postings and written assignments must be
original; cited material must be in quotation marks and provide the source. This includes
completing class assignment for participation. Plagiarism will result in a zero grade for the
assignment and will result in a failing grade for the class. Please see the Academic Dishonesty
section on Blackboard for more information. For more information, please refer to the “Academic
Regulations and Standards” in the CSUSB Bulletin of Courses for the university’s policies.
ACCOMMODATION NEEDS
Students with documented learning disabilities or special needs must clearly identify those
accommodation requirements at the beginning of the quarter. Students with personal/work- related
needs should contact the instructor before the class or during the first week to see if they are
resolvable. For additional information, please contact Services to Students with Disabilities (SSD)
at (909)537-5238 (voice), (909)537-7230(TTY), or fax (909) 537-7090. The Office of Services to
Students with Disabilities is committed to providing eligible students accommodations that ensure
equal access to learning and equal opportunity for
academic success.
12
ONLINE MATERIALS AND SECTIONS USED IN BLACKBOARD:
All students must be able to access Blackboard to participate in this class. Some of the elements
of Blackboard that will be used are:
• Announcements: I will post important comments, adjustments to the schedule or
syllabus, class feedback, etc.
• Syllabus: the syllabus will be placed here.
• Meet Your Instructor: information of your instructor.
• Modules & Assignments: weekly modules will hold video lectures, reading, and
assignments for the week.
• Economic Development Case Study Forum: you are required to submit your
proposed economic development case here.
• I have a question…: if you have any questions, please submit here and I will attempt
to answer within 12-24 hours.
• Remind App: information to sign up for the Remind App.
• Tools: you can access Announcement, Messages, Roster (access to your
classmates’ homepage), email (emails to the instructor sent out here will get my
priority in response), and My Grades (you can get your grades as they are posted) in
this section.
• Blackboard Help: technical assistance resources
Other help numbers: If you are having problems with your Blackboard account or need
information about how to use a Blackboard function call: 537-3395.
ADMINISTRATIVE DROPS IN THE FIRST WEEKS OF CLASS
“Students who fail to attend two consecutive class meetings during the first two weeks of
the term without contacting the faculty member or making special arrangements may be
dropped.” (University policy)
LATE ADDS AND WITHDRAWAL FROM CLASS
Late adds are allowed within the first week but students are fully responsible for the work and
assignments missed if they do add late. Official withdrawal must occur directly with the
registrar; the instructor has no responsibility for dropping you. Withdrawal is allowed through
the end of the third week of the semester (Census). The College routinely denies late drops
(after census) without documentation.
For more information, please refer to the “Academic Regulations and Standards” in the
CSUSB Bulletin of Courses for the university’s policies.