Finance Paper 3 pages
Data
| High School GPA | SAT Verbal | SAT Math | Paralegal GPA |
| 3.25 | 480 | 410 | 3.21 |
| 1.80 | 290 | 270 | 1.68 |
| 2.89 | 420 | 410 | 3.58 |
| 3.81 | 500 | 600 | 3.92 |
| 3.13 | 500 | 490 | 3.00 |
| 2.81 | 430 | 460 | 2.82 |
| 2.20 | 320 | 490 | 1.65 |
| 2.14 | 530 | 480 | 2.30 |
| 2.63 | 469 | 440 | 2.33 |
| the objective of this study is to see the influence of high school GPA and SAT math on paralegal GPA. | |||
| High School GPA | SAT Math | Paralegal GPA | |
| 3.25 | 410 | 3.21 | |
| 1.80 | 270 | 1.68 | |
| 2.89 | 410 | 3.58 | |
| 3.81 | 600 | 3.92 | |
| 3.13 | 490 | 3.00 | |
| 2.81 | 460 | 2.82 | |
| 2.20 | 490 | 1.65 | |
| 2.14 | 480 | 2.30 | |
| 2.63 | 440 | 2.33 |
Regression
| SUMMARY OUTPUT | ||||||||
| Regression Statistics | ||||||||
| Multiple R | 0.9192513522 | |||||||
| R Square | 0.8450230486 | |||||||
| Adjusted R Square | 0.7933640648 | |||||||
| Standard Error | 0.361631046 | |||||||
| Observations | 9 | |||||||
| ANOVA | ||||||||
| df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||||
| Regression | 2 | 4.2784268082 | 2.1392134041 | 16.3577172144 | 0.003722214 | |||
| Residual | 6 | 0.7846620807 | 0.1307770134 | |||||
| Total | 8 | 5.0630888889 | ||||||
| Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | Lower 95.0% | Upper 95.0% | |
| Intercept | -0.1695004314 | 0.688875302 | -0.2460538662 | 0.8138416692 | -1.855117572 | 1.5161167091 | -1.855117572 | 1.5161167091 |
| X Variable 1 | 1.284124913 | 0.2647696789 | 4.8499696726 | 0.0028517397 | 0.6362568478 | 1.9319929782 | 0.6362568478 | 1.9319929782 |
| X Variable 2 | -0.0013953127 | 0.0018757414 | -0.7438726412 | 0.485053775 | -0.0059850866 | 0.0031944612 | -0.0059850866 | 0.0031944612 |
| RESIDUAL OUTPUT | ||||||||
| Observation | Predicted Y | Residuals | ||||||
| 1 | 3.4318273251 | -0.2218273251 | the results of regression show that the coefficient of high school GPA is significant with p-value 0.002852 | |||||
| 2 | 1.7651899805 | -0.0851899805 | the coefficient of SAT math score is insignificant with pvalue 0.485 | |||||
| 3 | 2.9695423564 | 0.6104576436 | alpha in this test is 0.05. | |||||
| 4 | 3.8858278617 | 0.0341721383 | the coefficient of determination in this regression is 0.845 which means that 84% of variation paralegal GPA is explained by high school GPA, fairly high determination. | |||||
| 5 | 3.1661073188 | -0.1661073188 | ||||||
| 6 | 2.7970467279 | 0.0229532721 | ||||||
| 7 | 1.9718711497 | -0.3218711497 | ||||||
| 8 | 1.908776782 | 0.391223218 | ||||||
| 9 | 2.5938104978 | -0.2638104978 |
X Variable 1 Line Fit Plot
Y 3.25 1.8 2.89 3.81 3.13 2.81 2.2000000000000002 2.14 2.63 3.21 1.68 3.58 3.92 3 2.82 1.65 2.2999999999999998 2.33 Predicted Y 3.25 1.8 2.89 3.81 3.13 2.81 2.2000000000000002 2.14 2.63 3.4318273250949476 1.7651899805203763 2.9695423564190655 3.8858278616601112 3.1661073188169802 2.7970467279303928 1.9718711497376176 1.9087767820482211 2.593810497772286X Variable 1
Y
X Variable 2 Line Fit Plot
Y 410 270 410 600 490 460 490 480 440 3.21 1.68 3.58 3.92 3 2.82 1.65 2.2999999999999998 2.33 Predicted Y 410 270 410 600 490 460 490 480 440 3.4318273250949476 1.7651899805203763 2.9695423564190655 3.8858278616601112 3.1661073188169802 2.7970467279303928 1.9718711497376176 1.9087767820482211 2.593810497772286X Variable 2
Y