Annuity and compounding

PA 1 by Srinadha raju Uddaraju

Submission date: 14-Mar-2021 11:49PM (UTC-0700) Submission ID: 1533394228 File name: 7842_Srinadha_raju_Uddaraju_PA_1_514414_2078268073.pdf (151.41K) Word count: 1608 Character count: 8514

Title of Paper

Title Page's Information 1

Title of Paper

Indentation is required.

Support

Support

2

3

4

5

6

7

The word "References"

51% SIMILARITY INDEX

31% INTERNET SOURCES

11% PUBLICATIONS

46% STUDENT PAPERS

1 12% 2 6% 3 5% 4 5% 5 4% 6 2% 7 2% 8 2%

9

PA 1 ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Liberty University Student Paper

Submitted to Westcliff University Student Paper

Submitted to Saint George's University Student Paper

www.investopedia.com Internet Source

Submitted to Champlain College Student Paper

Submitted to Northern Kentucky University Student Paper

Submitted to University of Newcastle upon Tyne Student Paper

Submitted to Colorado Technical University Online Student Paper

Submitted to Oxford Brookes University

1% 10 1% 11 1% 12 1% 13 1% 14 1% 15 1% 16 1% 17 1% 18 1%

19 1%

Student Paper

Submitted to University of Pittsburgh Student Paper

Submitted to monticelloschools Student Paper

Submitted to Blackburn College, Lancashire Student Paper

henryzm.wordpress.com Internet Source

www.dau.mil Internet Source

www.kmco.com Internet Source

Submitted to Spartanburg Methodist College Student Paper

www.scribd.com Internet Source

John Price. "The Conscious Investor", Wiley, 2010 Publication

Submitted to North Harris Montgomery Community College District Student Paper

20 1% 21 1% 22 <1%

Exclude quotes Off

Exclude bibliography Off

Exclude matches Off

acadoceo.com Internet Source

dokumen.pub Internet Source

Michael Samonas. "Financial Forecasting, Analysis, and Modelling", Wiley, 2015 Publication

FINAL GRADE

76/100 PA 1 GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

There are good arguments, analysis, examples, and explanations in your paper!

Thanks

Areas for improvement:

- There are some APA formatting mistakes in your paper. Please read my comments in the bubbles on your text.

- Some of the claims have not been properly backed-up by in-text citations. If there are any claims in the paper, they need to be supported by an article, or evidence, which is high quality or peer reviewed.

- Consider CLOs or the course material, while addressing the issues in your paper.

- For bigger assignments such as PAs and CLAs it is suggested to prepare sections such as introduction (which would be your paper’s name), discussion (or arguments, or analysis,…), and conclusions. This way the reader would better realize the process of your paper, and the points are more clear. You may use different levels of headings in your discussion section.

- Similarity rate is too high, and that could greatly reduce your grade. Try to write the content in your own words by paraphrasing. If repeated, based on the schools regulations, the paper could get reported and the grade for the paper would be zero.

QM

QM

QM

QM

QM

QM

- Paper does not provide enough content for analysis and explanation of findings.

PAGE 1

Title of Paper | Formatting paper needs a title that is bold, centered, and all major words' first letters are capital.

Title Page's Information | Formatting

Title page's information is incomplete and/or is not based on APA formatting rules. Please read APA's 7th. ed. formatting rules.

Comment 1 no comment

PAGE 2

Title of Paper | Formatting paper needs a title that is bold, centered, and all major words' first letters are capital.

Indentation is required. | Formatting First line of each paragraph needs indentation based on APA 7th ed.'s formatting instructions. Please read the requirements for indentation.

Support | Argument Support Needed: A well-written paper will include strong support for its thesis. Support for your thesis should come from primary (original documents, interviews, and personal experiences) and secondary (information that has been processed or interpreted by someone else) sources. To use your support effectively, you must elaborate upon the information, quotations, and examples taken from your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also important to remember to cite the sources of the evidence and support you use in your paper.

Support | Argument Support Needed: A well-written paper will include strong support for its thesis. Support for your thesis should come from primary (original documents, interviews, and personal experiences) and secondary (information that has been processed or interpreted by someone else) sources. To use your support effectively, you must elaborate upon the information, quotations, and examples taken from your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also important to remember to cite the sources of the evidence and

QM

support you use in your paper.

Comment 2

Results require analysis.

Comment 3 | Argument

Needs analysis.

PAGE 3

Comment 4 | Argument

Needs analysis.

PAGE 4

Comment 5 | Argument

Needs analysis.

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

Comment 6 | Argument

Needs analysis. You may make comparisons with a competitive, or explain how the overall industry is reacting to that.

Comment 7 | Organization

Paper needs a conclusions section.

PAGE 7

The word "References" | Formatting The word "References" should be bold and centered. Please read APA's 7th ed. requirements for the reference page.

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

RUBRIC: 2019_MBA_QUANTITATIVE RUBRIC

ORIGINALITY (20%)

EXEMPLARY (10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

PROFICIENT (6)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

ARGUMENT (15%)

7.60 / 10

6 / 10

Originality and Content

The paper is content rich, all questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *critical analysis *application of learned concepts to real world *research- based evidence *originality with a maximum similarity index of 20%.

The paper is content rich, all questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *critical analysis *application of learned concepts to real world *research- based evidence *originality with a maximum similarity index of 20%.

The paper is content rich, most questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *critical analysis *example application of learned concepts *research- based evidence *originality with a maximum similarity index of 22%.

The paper is content rich, most questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *critical analysis *example application of learned concepts *research- based evidence *originality with a maximum similarity index of 22%.

The paper is content rich, most questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *critical analysis *example application of learned concepts *research- based evidence *originality with a maximum similarity index of 22%.

The paper contains relevant content, some questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *some critical analysis *example of learned concepts *research-based evidence *originality with a maximum similarity index of 25%.

The paper contains relevant content, some questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *some critical analysis *example of learned concepts *research-based evidence *originality with a maximum similarity index of 25%.

The paper contains relevant content, some questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *some critical analysis *example of learned concepts *research-based evidence *originality with a maximum similarity index of 25%.

The paper lacks relevant content, some questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *limited critical analysis *limited or no example of learned concepts *limited or no research-based evidence *similarity index exceeds 25%.

The paper lacks relevant content, some questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *limited critical analysis *limited or no example of learned concepts *limited or no research-based evidence *similarity index exceeds 25%.

The paper lacks relevant content, some questions and their parts have been answered demonstrating: *limited critical analysis *limited or no example of learned concepts *limited or no research-based evidence *similarity index exceeds 25%.

6 / 10

EXEMPLARY (10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

PROFICIENT (6)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

ORGANIZATION (5%)

EXEMPLARY (10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

The paper: *demonstrates effective, well supported argument *provides supporting evidence for argument *demonstrates a strong relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates effective, well supported argument *provides supporting evidence for argument *demonstrates a strong relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates the ability to support an argument <br />* provides some supporting evidence for the argument *demonstrates some relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates the ability to support an argument <br />* provides some supporting evidence for the argument *demonstrates some relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates the ability to support an argument <br />* provides some supporting evidence for the argument *demonstrates some relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates limited support for the argument *provides limited evidence for the argument *demonstrates a limited relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates limited support for the argument *provides limited evidence for the argument *demonstrates a limited relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates limited support for the argument *provides limited evidence for the argument *demonstrates a limited relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates limited or no support for the argument *provides limited or no evidence for the argument *has a limited or no relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates limited or no support for the argument *provides limited or no evidence for the argument *has a limited or no relationship between argument and assignment requirements

The paper: *demonstrates limited or no support for the argument *provides limited or no evidence for the argument *has a limited or no relationship between argument and assignment requirements

8 / 10

The paper is well organized and includes:<br />*logical flow *correct use of APA headings *introduction and conclusion

The paper is well organized and includes:<br />*logical flow *correct use of APA headings *introduction and conclusion

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

PROFICIENT (6)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

GRAMMAR (5%)

EXEMPLARY (10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

PROFICIENT (6)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS

The paper is well organized for the most part with an adequate degree of: *logical flow *use of APA headings *introduction and conclusion

The paper is well organized for the most part with an adequate degree of: *logical flow *use of APA headings *introduction and conclusion

The paper is well organized for the most part with an adequate degree of: *logical flow *use of APA headings *introduction and conclusion

The paper is somewhat organized with: *a non-continuous logical flow *some use of APA headings *limited introduction and/or conclusion

The paper is somewhat organized with: *a non-continuous logical flow *some use of APA headings *limited introduction and/or conclusion

The paper is somewhat organized with: *a non-continuous logical flow *some use of APA headings *limited introduction and/or conclusion

The paper has limited or lacks: *logical flow *use of APA headings *introduction and/or conclusion

The paper has limited or lacks: *logical flow *use of APA headings *introduction and/or conclusion

The paper has limited or lacks: *logical flow *use of APA headings *introduction and/or conclusion

10 / 10

Grammar and Spelling

The paper contains correct grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.

The paper contains correct grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.

The paper contains correct grammar with only minor errors in spelling, and/or sentence structure.

The paper contains correct grammar with only minor errors in spelling, and/or sentence structure.

The paper contains correct grammar with only minor errors in spelling, and/or sentence structure.

The paper contains some grammatical errors, misspellings, and may contain inadequate sentence structure.

The paper contains some grammatical errors, misspellings, and may contain inadequate

IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

FORMATTING (5%)

EXEMPLARY (10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

PROFICIENT (6)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

sentence structure.

The paper contains some grammatical errors, misspellings, and may contain inadequate sentence structure.

The paper lacks correct grammar, has misspelled words and weak sentence structure in multiple paragraphs.

The paper lacks correct grammar, has misspelled words and weak sentence structure in multiple paragraphs.

The paper lacks correct grammar, has misspelled words and weak sentence structure in multiple paragraphs.

6 / 10

The paper follows all formatting guidelines, including page-length, APA formatting requirements, correctly formatted in text citations, and correctly formatted references and reference page

The paper follows all formatting guidelines, including page-length, APA formatting requirements, correctly formatted in text citations, and correctly formatted references and reference page

The paper follows all or most formatting guidelines, including page-length, APA formatting requirements, mostly correctly formatted in text citations, and mostly correctly formatted references and reference page

The paper follows all or most formatting guidelines, including page-length, APA formatting requirements, mostly correctly formatted in text citations, and mostly correctly formatted references and reference page

The paper follows all or most formatting guidelines, including page-length, APA formatting requirements, mostly correctly formatted in text citations, and mostly correctly formatted references and reference page

The paper only follows some formatting guidelines, including page-length, APA formatting requirements, some correctly formatted in text citations, and some correctly formatted references and reference page

The paper only follows some formatting guidelines, including page-length, APA formatting requirements, some correctly formatted in text citations, and some correctly formatted references and reference page

The paper only follows some formatting guidelines, including page-length, APA formatting requirements, some correctly formatted in text citations, and some correctly formatted references and reference page

The paper fails to follow formatting guidelines, including page-length and APA formatting requirements to a substantial degree. Limited or no correctly formatted in text citations,

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

RESEARCH (10%)

EXEMPLARY (10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

PROFICIENT (6)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

references, and reference page

The paper fails to follow formatting guidelines, including page-length and APA formatting requirements to a substantial degree. Limited or no correctly formatted in text citations, references, and reference page

The paper fails to follow formatting guidelines, including page-length and APA formatting requirements to a substantial degree. Limited or no correctly formatted in text citations, references, and reference page

8 / 10

Effective Research

Student demonstrates the ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

Student demonstrates the ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

Student demonstrates some ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

Student demonstrates some ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

Student demonstrates some ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

Student demonstrates limited ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

Student demonstrates limited ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

Student demonstrates limited ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

Student demonstrates limited to no ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

Student demonstrates limited to no ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

RESOURCES (10%)

EXEMPLARY (10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

PROFICIENT (6)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

PRESENTATION (10%)

EXEMPLARY

Student demonstrates limited to no ability to: *draw logical and valid conclusions *provide supporting researched-based evidence including peer reviewed articles *utilize the textbook, online databases and the internet to locate supporting literature

10 / 10

Quality Resources

The student uses at least 5 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (non-website based) and 1 textbook-based resource to support his/her argument.

The student uses at least 5 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (non-website based) and 1 textbook-based resource to support his/her argument.

The student uses at least 4 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (non-website based) and 1 textbook-based resource to support his/her argument.

The student uses at least 4 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (non-website based) and 1 textbook-based resource to support his/her argument.

The student uses at least 4 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (non-website based) and 1 textbook-based resource to support his/her argument.

The student uses at least 3 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resource which may be website-based, and 1 textbook-based resource to support his/her argument.

The student uses at least 3 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resource which may be website-based, and 1 textbook-based resource to support his/her argument.

The student uses at least 3 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resource which may be website-based, and 1 textbook-based resource to support his/her argument.

The student does not use or has limited use of quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources and/or the work only contains website-based resources and/or only uses the textbook to support his/ her argument.

The student does not use or has limited use of quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources and/or the work only contains website-based resources and/or only uses the textbook to support his/ her argument.

The student does not use or has limited use of quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources and/or the work only contains website-based resources and/or only uses the textbook to support his/ her argument.

9 / 10

(Ability to convert relevant information into various mathematical or quantitative forms)

Student is skillful in representing data in the correct statistical format and can defend his

(10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

PROFICIENT (6)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

APPLICATION (10%)

EXEMPLARY (10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

or her choice of methodology in doing so.<br /><br />

Student is skillful in representing data in the correct statistical format and can defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.<br /><br />

Student competently represents data in the correct statistical format and can defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.

Student competently represents data in the correct statistical format and can defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.

Student competently represents data in the correct statistical format and can defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.

Student represents data in a mostly correct statistical format and can somewhat defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.

Student represents data in a mostly correct statistical format and can somewhat defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.

Student represents data in a mostly correct statistical format and can somewhat defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.

Student is unable to represent data in a correct statistical format and cannot defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.

Student is unable to represent data in a correct statistical format and cannot defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.

Student is unable to represent data in a correct statistical format and cannot defend his or her choice of methodology in doing so.

6 / 10

"Application & Analysis (Ability to make judgments and draw appropriate conclusions based on quantitative analysis of data)"

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for insightful, carefully qualified and supported conclusions *provides detailed descriptions of complex business problems

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for insightful, carefully qualified and supported conclusions *provides detailed descriptions of complex business problems

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for competent, reasonable,<br />appropriately qualified and mostly supported conclusions *provides good descriptions of complex business problems<br />

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for competent, reasonable,<br />appropriately qualified and mostly supported conclusions *provides good descriptions of complex business problems<br />

PROFICIENT (6)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

COMMUNICATION (10%)

EXEMPLARY (10)

EXEMPLARY (9)

PROFICIENT (8)

PROFICIENT (7)

PROFICIENT (6)

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for competent, reasonable,<br />appropriately qualified and mostly supported conclusions *provides good descriptions of complex business problems<br />

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for basic, plausible conclusions with limited qualification and supported conclusions *little in the way of describing complex business problems

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for basic, plausible conclusions with limited qualification and supported conclusions *little in the way of describing complex business problems

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for basic, plausible conclusions with limited qualification and supported conclusions *little in the way of describing complex business problems

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for tentative, basic conclusions with little or no qualifications or supported conclusions *limited or no description of complex business problems<br />

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for tentative, basic conclusions with little or no qualifications or supported conclusions *limited or no description of complex business problems<br />

Uses the quantitative analysis of data: *as the basis for tentative, basic conclusions with little or no qualifications or supported conclusions *limited or no description of complex business problems<br />

10 / 10

"Communication (Expressing quantitative evidence in support of work produced)"

*Uses appropriate nomenclature to present work *Uses correct format to illustrate findings *Presents evidence in a logical manner *Explains findings in a style suitable to the audience to promote understanding *Provides well considered responses to questions

*Uses appropriate nomenclature to present work *Uses correct format to illustrate findings *Presents evidence in a logical manner *Explains findings in a style suitable to the audience to promote understanding *Provides well considered responses to questions

*Uses appropriate nomenclature to present work *Uses correct format to illustrate findings *Presents evidence in a mostly logical manner *Explains findings in a style suitable to the audience to promote understanding *Provides mostly well considered responses to questions

*Uses appropriate nomenclature to present work *Uses correct format to illustrate findings *Presents evidence in a mostly logical manner *Explains findings in a style suitable to the audience to promote understanding *Provides mostly well considered responses to questions

*Uses appropriate nomenclature to present work *Uses correct format to illustrate findings *Presents evidence in a mostly logical manner *Explains findings in a style suitable to the

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (5)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (4)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (3)

UNSATISFACTORY (2)

UNSATISFACTORY (1)

UNSATISFACTORY (0)

audience to promote understanding *Provides mostly well considered responses to questions

*Uses somewhat appropriate nomenclature to present work *Uses mostly correct format to illustrate findings *Presents limited evidence in a mostly logical manner *Explains findings in a style suitable to the audience to promote understanding *Provides somewhat well considered responses to questions

*Uses somewhat appropriate nomenclature to present work *Uses mostly correct format to illustrate findings *Presents limited evidence in a mostly logical manner *Explains findings in a style suitable to the audience to promote understanding *Provides somewhat well considered responses to questions

*Uses somewhat appropriate nomenclature to present work *Uses mostly correct format to illustrate findings *Presents limited evidence in a mostly logical manner *Explains findings in a style suitable to the audience to promote understanding *Provides somewhat well considered responses to questions

*Uses limited nomenclature to present work. *Uses unconventional format to illustrate findings *Presents limited evidence or in an illogical manner *Limited explanation of findings in a style that does little to promote understanding *Provides limited responses to questions.

*Uses limited nomenclature to present work. *Uses unconventional format to illustrate findings *Presents limited evidence or in an illogical manner *Limited explanation of findings in a style that does little to promote understanding *Provides limited responses to questions.

*Uses limited nomenclature to present work. *Uses unconventional format to illustrate findings *Presents limited evidence or in an illogical manner *Limited explanation of findings in a style that does little to promote understanding *Provides limited responses to questions.