information

Crowdsourcing: Threadless and Challenge Post

Threadless is an online apparel store for t-shirt designs. The company is using a unique way of reaching out to the customers and ensure they are satisfied - crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing refers to outsourcing tasks to be performed by the employees from a large group of people to gather different ideas and the approaches as they have been suggested by the crowd. In addition to crowdsourcing, the apparel firm gets the customers' preference before printing the t-shirts. The paper discusses the success of Threadless firms, the impacts of crowdsourcing, and its application in other areas.

The Success of Threadless

Threadless is an online store that deals with t-shirt printing. Its business of t-shirt printing has been successful because of the crowdsourcing technique they have employed. Crowdsourcing enhances the collection of the quality new ideas which aids in the ability to find unexpected quality solutions as preferred by the public (Goodman, & Paolacci, 2017). Involving a large group of people in problem-solving led to success as it was experienced by Threadless. This is because different approaches preferred by the customers gained from the crowd is what is used in the t-shirt designs.

Additionally, from the crowdsourcing employed by the company, interested people from the crowd are employed to be part of the company employees. This also led to their success as the public vote opinion is highly considered in product development. Through the interested employees and other opinions from the rest of the crowd, a small portion of the suggested designs is selected (Devari, et al., 2017). They are then printed and sold out from the outlet online stores of the company.

Furthermore, more success is attributed as a result of the consideration of public opinion (Goodman, & Paolacci, 2017). Even though the designs have been outsourced from the crowd, they are then posted on the t-shirt design website so that they can be rated. The highest rating design is one that gets to be printed. This led to a lot of success as the product from the company is what the public user. They do not wait for the comments to be out to rectify.

The Competitive Advantage of Threadless

Threadless company has three major competitive advantages over its competitors. First is using the interested public people from crowdsourcing as part of their labor. Unlike other design firms that employ highly talented people in their product line, Threadless outsources most of its employees depending on their interests. This is highly advantageous as the people who are interested at work do their job with passion who might be forced to work.

Getting public opinion before printing design is another competitive advantage of Threadless over the other firms that are using the traditional strategies (Salgado, et al., 2020). For Threadless, before a t-shirt design is printed, it is first put on the company website for one week to be rated by the public who are the consumers. After one week, the design with more rates is the one taken in for printing. This is a very strong competitive advantage as the company prints the t-shirts that are more required by the users. Comments about design are taken in before printing hence quality printing.

The last competitive advantage that the firm has is reprinting the t-shirt only when the customers demand it. This implies that their prints are limited and unique, unlike other firms. Each time they make a print, it implies that the first buyers are the ones to get the products. This calls for more customers to be attracted to the product before it is out of stock hence a great competitive advantage. Furthermore, it also does the reprinting when the demand is high, unlike the other firms.

The Logic of Crowdsourcing

The primary logic for crowdsourcing is open innovation. With this, a distributed approach in recognizing knowledge and ideas is used. During the operation, both the employees and the public are allowed to participate. This facilitates co-creation as a lot of knowledge and skills is employed in developing the ideas for the new products and services (Devari, et al., 2017). This means that quality ideas are the ones considered as suggestions and solutions come from a large pull.

Through this logic employed by crowdsourcing, it has been applied in many areas as a result of its benefits. One of the benefits is the ability to find the most quality solutions to the firms. Through the use of many people to outsource ideas, the public general need is collected after the statistics have been done (Salgado, et al., 2020). Secondly, it allows a great diversity of thinking as a wide group of people together to give a contribution of their ideas (Devari, et al., 2017). This helps in as the customer data is collected first with effectiveness and efficiency. Lastly, it is a faster way of problem-solving hence saving time (Maddalena, et al., 2016). This is because there are a lot of channels to be used for crowdsourcing. Among them are social media platforms like websites. Besides, we also have a physical meeting, calls, and text messages as the pool of information from the crowd travels faster.

Traps and Limitations of Crowdsourcing

Even though crowdsourcing is of great advantage to the different firms. It is affected by several traps and cons that negatively affect the firm. Among them is the trap and limitation of confidentiality and intellectual property (de Beer, et al., 2017). As information is obtained from a large crowd, the ideas that are being put in place have no clear paths of where they are coming from together with the people to benefit from them. According to Mazzola, Acur, Piazza, and Perrone (2018), when outsourcing a solution from the public, the company might be forced to share some of its sensitive information to get a working solution.

Furthermore, it becomes hard to control all processes while crows sourcing. Unlike the traditional projects, it is hard to control the crowdsourcing projects as it is hard to control the behaviors of all the participants in the crowd (Connors, et al., 2020). This led to running a risk of inconsistent outcomes.

Potential Beneficiaries of Crowdsourcing

Apart from Threadless company, many businesses can benefit from crowdsourcing. One of them is the business that deals with application development. Before the development of a certain application, a crowd should be outsourced to give their choices and preferences concerning the functionality of the application (Saito & Iimura, 2020). Through this, the user’s choice and preferences will be gathered and implemented in the systems. This will result in a few errors and less customer satisfaction when the product is out in the market.

Another business that can achieve breakthrough gains via crowdsourcing is the artificial hair business. Before launching an artificial hair product, they should first get the customer preferences concerning the design. This will help to eliminate the design development of artificial hair products that are not selling.

Summary and Conclusions

In conclusion, it is evident that the success of the Threadless company is a result of the crowdsourcing techniques that have been employed. This is because a lot of ideas and innovations are outsourced from a wide environment and the best implemented. Besides, the techniques of getting the customers' preferences before launching a product together with crowdsourcing are of great gain and they should be adopted by most of the firms. This is well to deal away with the complaints from the customers hence quality products and high sales.

References

Connors, S., Spangenberg, K., Perkins, A. W., & Forehand, M. (2020). Crowdsourcing the Implicit Association Test: Limitations and Best Practices. Journal of Advertising, 1-9.

de Beer, J., McCarthy, I. P., Soliman, A., & Treen, E. (2017). Click here to agree: Managing intellectual property when crowdsourcing solutions. Business Horizons, 60(2), 207-217.

Devari, A., Nikolaev, A. G., & He, Q. (2017). Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 105, 105-122.

Goodman, J. K., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 196-210.

Maddalena, E., Basaldella, M., De Nart, D., Degl'Innocenti, D., Mizzaro, S., & Demartini, G. (2016, January). Crowdsourcing Relevance Assessments: The Unexpected Benefits of Limiting the Time to Judge. In HCOMP (pp. 129-138).

Mazzola, E., Acur, N., Piazza, M., & Perrone, G. (2018). “To own or not to own?” A study on the determinants and consequences of alternative intellectual property rights arrangements in crowdsourcing for innovation contests. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 908-929.

Saito, S., & Iimura, Y. (2020, June). Hybrid sourcing: novel combination of crowdsourcing and inner-sourcing for software developments. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (pp. 81-85).

Salgado, S., Hemonnet-Goujot, A., Henard, D. H., & De Barnier, V. (2020). The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective. Journal of Business Research, 117, 29-43.