Can this be done in 5 hours?.. 6pageS..wk5..5015
Saltwata2012
Overviewwk5ass2.docxAssignment Overview
Now that you have completed the literature review and have a solid theoretical grounding for your problem statement, you will be determining the methodology for your program evaluation. The purpose of this assignment is for you to learn how to use scientific methods to conduct a program evaluation using an appropriate methodology based on the provided case study, Teen Parenting Case Study, and data.
By successfully completing this assignment, you demonstrate your proficiency in the following competency and specialized behaviors:
· Competency 4: Engage in practice-informed research and research-informed practice.
· C4.SP.A: Apply leadership skills, ethical use of technology and research findings to inform and improve practice, policy, and programs in the specialization of advanced generalist practice settings.
· Related Assignment Criteria:
· 4: Describe the sample and the sampling method or methods.
· 5: Identify how data will be collected and the process for data collection.
· 7: Develop an informed consent form that is appropriate to the case study.
· C4.SP.B: Analyze and respond to ethical, culturally informed, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive strategies in the specialization of advanced generalist social work practice that address inherent biases for use in quantitative and qualitative research methods.
· Related Assignment Criteria:
· 1: Describe the program or service.
· 2: Develop a guiding research question or hypothesis for the chosen program evaluation methods.
· 3: Analyze different methods of program evaluation types and methodology to select the best method for the specific case study.
· 6: Discuss ethical issues pertaining to the selected method of program evaluation.
Assignment Description
In this assignment, you will describe how to evaluate the program found in the case study. You will also determine the methodology for this program evaluation and indicate other details such as associated research questions, definitions of variables, sampling and data collection procedures, applicable instruments, and discussion of ethical issues pertaining to human subjects.
Assignment Instructions
Using the case study, Teen Parenting Case Study [PDF] , design a program evaluation plan. Use the following outline:
· Introduction: State the topics that will be covered in this section.
· Organization description: Describe the program or service (program focus, resources, population, clients served, and the theory of change). Include a description of the stakeholders and evaluation purpose.
· Research questions and hypotheses: Revisit research questions and hypotheses established in the Week 3 assignment, Research Literature Review.
· Definition of variables and terms in the study: Define your major variables in a clear and concise manner, and distinguish between independent and dependent variables. Every variable that is identified in the research questions should be defined clearly in this section in terms of what it is and how it will be measured.
· Description of the methodology (study design).
· Explain whether your study is qualitative, quantitative, or both and whether it is cross-sectional (single point in time) or longitudinal (more than one measure from the same people).
· Explain how you are going to determine the efficacy of your program (for example, pre-tests and post-tests, comparison to a similar group of people not receiving program services).
· Explain if you are comparing the group getting the intervention to any other group on the outcomes of interest (a control or comparison group).
· Explain if you are using more than one source of data to triangulate measures of your outcome of interest (for example, rates of participation, qualitative interviews, and a satisfaction survey).
· Explain why this method of program evaluation and methodology is best practice (as compared to other possible models).
· Sampling procedures.
· Distinguish between the population and your sample.
· Provide some basic demographic information that you would anticipate.
· State how many people are taking part in the study and how you will go about sampling them.
· Explain how the control/comparison group will be selected or how people are assigned to that group, if you are using a control/comparison group.
· Instrumentation: Do you plan to use a standardized instrument or will you design your own? Why? Every variable that is addressed in your research questions and operational definitions should also be addressed in this section. Describe the validity and reliability of your instruments. Note that you must include at least one quantitative measure. Include your instruments, including any qualitative interview protocols, in an appendix.
· Data collection and procedures: Describe exactly what you plan to do and when. Explain how and when you will collect each measure, and how and when you will begin the intervention and for how long.
· Human protection: Discuss ethical issues pertaining to the method of program evaluation you selected. Discuss how you will address and minimize these issues. Include a sample informed consent (and minor assent, if necessary) as an appendix.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should meet the following requirements:
· Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
· APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards. Use Academic Writer
· Links to an external site.
· for guidance in citing sources in proper APA style. See the Writing Center
· Links to an external site.
· for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
· Resources: Cite any preexisting instruments that you choose to use and the textbook in referencing theory of change and organization stakeholders.
· Length of paper: 5–7 double-spaced pages.
· Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
· Due date: Submit your assignment no later than 11:59 p.m. on Sunday of this week.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:
· Competency 1: Apply leadership skills, ethical use of technology and research findings to inform and improve practice, policy, and programs in the specialization of advanced generalist practice settings. (C4.SP.A)
· Describe the sample and the sampling method or methods.(C4.SP.A)
· Identify how data will be collected and the process for data collection. (C4.SP.A)
· Develop an informed consent form that is appropriate to the case study. (C4.SP.A)
· Competency 2: Analyze and respond to ethical, culturally informed, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive strategies in the specialization of advanced generalist social work practice that address inherent biases for use in quantitative and qualitative research methods. (C4.SP.B)
· Describe the program or service. (C4.SP.B)
· Develop a guiding research question or hypothesis for the chosen program evaluation methods. (C4.SP.B)
· Analyze different methods of program evaluation types and methodology to select the best method for the specific case study. (C4.SP.B)
· Discuss ethical issues pertaining to the selected method of program evaluation. (C4.SP.B)
· Competency 3: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
· Express ideas clearly, employing correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
· Use proper APA style to cite and reference sources.
View Rubric
|
|
|
|
|
Program Evaluation and Methodology |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
Describe the program or service. (C4.SP.B) |
11 to >9.35 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes the program or service with examples and references. 9.35 to >7.7 pts PROFICIENT Describes the program or service. 7.7 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies the program or service. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify the program or service. |
/ 11 pts |
|
Develop a guiding research question or hypothesis for the chosen program evaluation methods. (C4.SP.B) |
11 to >9.35 pts DISTINGUISHED Develops a guiding research question or hypothesis for the chosen program evaluation methods and justifies why it is the most appropriate hypothesis for the evaluation method. 9.35 to >7.7 pts PROFICIENT Develops a guiding research question or hypothesis for the chosen program evaluation methods. 7.7 to >0 pts BASIC Develops a guiding research question or hypothesis but does not connect well for the chosen program evaluation methods. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not develop a guiding research question or hypothesis for the chosen program evaluation methods. |
/ 11 pts |
|
Analyze different methods of program evaluation types and methodology to select the best method for the specific case study. (C4.SP.B) |
11 to >9.35 pts DISTINGUISHED Analyzes different methods of program evaluation types and methodology to select the best method for the specific case study and justifies why this is the best method. 9.35 to >7.7 pts PROFICIENT Analyzes different methods of program evaluation types and methodology to select the best method for the specific case study. 7.7 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses different methods of program evaluation types and methodology to select the best method for the specific case study. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not discuss different methods of program evaluation types and methodology to select the best method for the specific case study. |
/ 11 pts |
|
Describe the sample and the sampling method or methods.(C4.SP.A) |
11 to >9.35 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes the sample and the sampling method or methods with research to justify the sampling method. 9.35 to >7.7 pts PROFICIENT Describes the sample and the sampling method or methods. 7.7 to >0 pts BASIC Describes the sample but not the method or methods. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe the sample and the sampling method or methods. |
/ 11 pts |
|
Identify how data will be collected and the process for data collection. (C4.SP.A) |
11 to >9.35 pts DISTINGUISHED Identifies how data will be collected and the process for data collection, with research to justify the data collection process. 9.35 to >7.7 pts PROFICIENT Identifies how data will be collected and the process for data collection. 7.7 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies how data will be collected. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify how data will be collected and the process for data collection. |
/ 11 pts |
|
Discuss ethical issues pertaining to the selected method of program evaluation. (C4.SP.B) |
11 to >9.35 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates ethical issues pertaining to the selected method of program evaluation. 9.35 to >7.7 pts PROFICIENT Discusses ethical issues pertaining to the selected method of program evaluation. 7.7 to >0 pts BASIC Lists ethical issues pertaining to the selected method of program evaluation. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not discuss ethical issues pertaining to the selected method of program. |
/ 11 pts |
|
Develop an informed consent form that is appropriate to the case study. (C4.SP.A) |
14 to >11.9 pts DISTINGUISHED Develops an informed consent form that is appropriate to the case study with an explanation of why it is the most appropriate. 11.9 to >9.8 pts PROFICIENT Develops an informed consent form that is appropriate to the case study. 9.8 to >0 pts BASIC Develops an informed consent form with an unclear connection to the case study. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not develop an informed consent form that is appropriate to the case study. |
/ 14 pts |
|
Express ideas clearly, employing correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. |
10 to >8.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Expresses ideas clearly, employing correct grammar, usage, and mechanics in an outstanding and consistent manner. 8.5 to >7 pts PROFICIENT Expresses ideas clearly, employing correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. 7 to >0 pts BASIC Uses proper grammar, usage, and mechanics, but not in a consistent manner. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not use proper grammar, usage, and mechanics. |
/ 10 pts |
|
Use proper APA style to cite and reference sources. |
10 to >8.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Uses proper APA style to cite and reference sources in an outstanding and consistent manner. 8.5 to >7 pts PROFICIENT Uses proper APA style to cite and reference sources. 7 to >0 pts BASIC Uses proper APA style to cite and reference sources, but not in a consistent manner. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not use proper APA style to cite and reference sources. |
/ 10 pts |
