Business & Finance Overview of Case Studies Assignment

Criteria Ratings Points

Abstract, Introduction

6 to >5 pts

Advanced

Abstract clearly states the purpose and main conclusion and Introduction provides a complete overview of the discussion.

5 to >4 pts

Proficient

Abstract and Introduction provides a partial purpose, main conclusion and overview of the discussion.

4 to >0 pts

Developing

Abstract and Introduction present but does not provide an overview of the discussion.

0 pts

Not Present

6 pts

Description of each of the 3 Case Study Types

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

A complete description of each of the case study types and applicable example is discussed, and flow is logical, and fully cited

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

A partial description of each of the case study types or applicable example is discussed, or flow is mostly logical, or partially cited.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

The descriptions of each of the three case study types are inaccurate or insufficient or little to no example is discussed, or flow is not logical, or insufficiently cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

10 pts

Explanation of 4 Primary Case Study Designs/ Formats

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

A complete discussion of each of the primary case study designs/ formats is discussed, and flow is logical, and fully cited.

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

A partial discussion of the primary case study designs/ formats is discussed, or low is mostly logical, or partially cited.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

Minimal discussion of the primary case study designs/ formats or are incorrect, or flow is not logical, or insufficeintly cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

10 pts

Description of the Quality Tests of Validity and Reliability

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

A complete and thorough discussion of validity and reliability, identifying key points of each is discussed, and flow is logical, and fully cited.

9 to >8 pts

Proficient

A partial discussion of validity and reliability, or partially identifying key points of each is discussed, or flow is mostly logical, or partially cited.

8 to >0 pts

Developing

A minimal discussion of validity and reliability, or identifying key points of each is discussed, or flow is not logical, or insufficiently cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

10 pts

Overview of Case Studies Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B06_202540

Criteria Ratings Points

Description of Networked Phenomena

20 to >18 pts

Advanced

A thorough discussion of networked phenomena is present and flow is logical, and fully cited.

18 to >16 pts

Proficient

A partial discussion of networked phenomena is present, or flow is mostly logical, or partially cited.

16 to >0 pts

Developing

Little to no discussion of networked phenomena is present or flow is not logical, or insufficiently cited.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.

20 pts

Conclusion & Biblical Integration

4 to >3 pts

Advanced

Conclusion provides a complete summary of the discussion and highlights key points as well as a thoroughly integrated biblical worldview with at least 1 scripture reference.

3 to >2 pts

Proficient

Conclusion provides a partial summary of the discussion and highlights at least one key point and a partially integrated biblical worldview with at least 1 scripture reference.

2 to >0 pts

Developing

Conclusion present but does not summarize discussion or highlight key points and either a reference to a biblical worldview or no scripture reference.

0 pts

Not Present

Not completed.

4 pts

APA Format and Structure, References, and Citations, Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics, Composition

18 to >16 pts

Advanced

APA formatting and structure are followed, all references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and all assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition are all correct, and well-developed paragraphs.

16 to >15 pts

Proficient

APA formatting and structure are mostly followed, most references and citations correspond to each other or are mostly formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, or most assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Minor errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition are all correct, and partially-developed paragraphs.

15 to >0 pts

Developing

APA formatting and structure are insufficiently followed, many references and citations do not correspond to each other or are not formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, or most assertions are not supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Significant number of errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition, and isufficiently-developed paragraphs.

0 pts

Not Present

There are many errors in mechanics, composition, grammar.

18 pts

Overview of Case Studies Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B06_202540

Criteria Ratings Points

Sources/ Word Count

7 to >6 pts

Advanced

Six or more peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. The book sources provided are assigned course texts or the Bible only. Word Count is thorough (1000-1500 words).

6 to >5 pts

Proficient

Four to five peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. Books other than assigned course texts or the Bible are used as sources. Word Count is satisfactory (+/- 4%).

5 to >0 pts

Developing

One to three peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. Books other than course texts or the Bible are used as sources. Non-peer-reviewed sources are provided. Word Count is insufficient (>+/- 4%, <+/-10%).

0 pts

Not Present

No structure or formatting provided. Missing references and/or citations are rare, repetitious or non-existent. Word count (>+/-10%)

7 pts

Total Points: 85

Overview of Case Studies Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B06_202540