Outline

profileK123456789
outlineandtopic.docx

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity:

· Textbook: review all chapters

· Lesson

Instructions This course requires you to write an argumentative paper that is due in week 7. This week, you will submit a topic and outline. In Week 5, you will submit an annotated bibliography and source evaluation. Directions for the Week 5 and Week 7 assignments will be found in those respective weeks.

For this assignment, address the following:

1. Choose one of the following topics:

a. Should hospital emergency departments be used to treat mental health patients?

b. Should the title "Doctor" be allowed used in clinical situations by nurses who have earned doctoral degrees?

c. Whether vaping is a safe alternative to smoking

d. Whether ketogenic diets pose a health risk

e. Whether coffee consumption is a health benefit or a health risk

f. Whether positive psychology therapy is effective?

g. The value of DNA therapies in treating cancer

h. Should technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 be used to eliminate genetic diseases (or create designer babies)?

2. In a brief thesis paragraph, state the claim you will be making in your paper.

3. Provide an outline for your paper including at least 3 main points that you will use to support your claim. The claim you are making in (2) is your conclusion. Write the supporting points in the form of premises for that conclusion

Note: If you wish to substitute a topic, you must have the permission of your instructor.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

· Length: 150-200 words (not including title page or references page)

· 1-inch margins

· Double spaced

· 12-point Times New Roman font

· Title page

· References page

Grading This activity will be graded using the Topic & Outline Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

 

 

Rubric

Topic & Outline Grading Rubric - 25 pts

Topic & Outline Grading Rubric - 25 pts

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness of Submission

5.0 pts

Assignment submitted by due date.

0.0 pts

Assignment not submitted by due date.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis

10.0 pts

Thesis statement clearly identifies topic, issue and student’s claim (position) about the issue. Statement is focused, specific, and give clear indication of scope of paper.

8.5 pts

Thesis statement clearly identifies topic, issue and student’s position and point of view; gives some indication of scope of paper.

7.5 pts

Thesis statement identifies topic, issue and student’s position or point of view; little indication of scope of paper.

6.0 pts

Thesis statement identifies topic and issue, but no clear indication of student’s position or point of view.

0.0 pts

No thesis statement OR topic, issue, but no indication of student’s position or point of view.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOutline

10.0 pts

Outline contains minimum of three points directly related to topic, issue and student’s position; points are specific to topic, highly relevant and timely, show that student made preliminary investigation of topic sufficient to identify key points.

8.5 pts

Outline contains minimum of three points related to topic, issue and student’s position; points are relevant to topic; shows student has made some investigation of topic to determine key points.

7.5 pts

Outline contains minimum of three points related to topic, issue and student’s position; points are relevant to topic; shows minimal investigation of topic to determine key points.

6.0 pts

Outline contains at least two points AND/OR points are minimally related to topic AND/OR shows little or no investigation of topic to determine key points AND/OR points are vague, generalized, not specific to topic.

0.0 pts

No outline OR outline contains only one point; AND/OR points are vague, generalized.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 25.0

Previous Next