Statistic psychology paper
Introduction
What does touch means, why we care about it? Research shows. Example to catch people attention. Our hypothesis (male and female pairs touch each other more than other pairs) and the result that we are right from our Data. What our study has been done? Time changing will make different? If we observe people at night or afternoon? What is the rational.
Method
Observation ( in the bar and coffee shop)observe pairs(m and m)(m and f) ( fand f) romance and no romance touch such as shaking hands( please give examples and imagine to write details).
Result
Mean,stats,,Data
We limited some number of data of some purpose because outlier/ how many pairs
analyzing .
When we run one anova there is differ in the mean and significant differences.
F(2.186)=6.75, p=.001 which is p<.05
Number of touches
Touch and no touch
Touch per minute
Number of touches<10
Discussion
Is the discussion connected back to the intro so the reader had a sense of closure?
Numbers of touching group by 41÷ 63
Chu square
..1 x2(z1 n=189)=1630, p<.001
In last page:
2 tables and 1 figure
#table of number of touches
-gender pair(m,f)(f,f)(m,m)
-number of participant
-number of touches
- SD (stander Deviation)
-minimum number of touch
-maximum number of touch
# table of touch per minute
Figure( par graph) for touch and no touch
Data/type of gender pair
P>.05 is not significant
P<.05 significant
|
ANOVA |
|||||
|
number of touches |
|||||
|
|
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
Between Groups |
33.638 |
2 |
16.819 |
6.752 |
.001 |
|
Within Groups |
463.325 |
186 |
2.491 |
|
|
|
Total |
496.963 |
188 |
|
|
|
significant between the means
|
Multiple Comparisons |
||||||
|
Dependent Variable: number of touches |
||||||
|
Tukey HSD |
||||||
|
(I) type of gender pair |
(J) type of gender pair |
Mean Difference (I-J) |
Std. Error |
Sig. |
95% Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
|
mf |
mm |
.948* |
.280 |
.002 |
.29 |
1.61 |
|
|
ff |
.828* |
.282 |
.011 |
.16 |
1.50 |
|
mm |
mf |
-.948* |
.280 |
.002 |
-1.61 |
-.29 |
|
|
ff |
-.120 |
.281 |
.905 |
-.78 |
.54 |
|
ff |
mf |
-.828* |
.282 |
.011 |
-1.50 |
-.16 |
|
|
mm |
.120 |
.281 |
.905 |
-.54 |
.78 |
|
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. |
||||||
|
|
Result: F and f are significant different m and m m and f are significant different in the mean
|
touch no touch * type of gender pair Crosstabulation |
|||||
|
Count |
|||||
|
|
type of gender pair |
Total |
|||
|
|
mf |
mm |
ff |
|
|
|
touch no touch |
no touch |
22 |
42 |
41 |
105 |
|
|
touch |
41 |
22 |
21 |
84 |
|
Total |
63 |
64 |
62 |
189 |
in descriptive: devide 41/63 to get the touching pairs= percentages
|
Chi-Square Tests |
|||
|
|
Value |
df |
Asymptotic Significance (2-sided) |
|
Pearson Chi-Square |
16.300a |
2 |
.000 |
|
Likelihood Ratio |
16.407 |
2 |
.000 |
|
Linear-by-Linear Association |
12.325 |
1 |
.000 |
|
N of Valid Cases |
189 |
|
|
|
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27.56. |
Significant .000 statement: ….,x2(z1 n=189)=1630, p<.001