write the detail conclusion part for the OUTLINE I gave

1. Abstract

a. Case study

a. Narrative style store that shows chapter objective/purpose/problem/thing that needs to change

a. Statements of the problem and how it will be explore

a. Statement of the main way of knowing, its value, and why it's the chapter focus

a. Context of chapter & main characteristics of focus environmental assessment style

a. Tell the reader why

1. General Introduction:

b. Indigenous peoples of Ecuador

i. Indigenous cosmovisions, including Buen Vivir

i. Conflicts with industry and development

1. Describe Governmental structure

1. Historical context & timing

iii. Introduce Chevron Scenario

1. Adapting this constitution happened in the midst of the Chevron v. Ecuador lawsuit.

1. It was the pinnacle of “the most well-funded corporate retaliation campaign in U.S. history”

1. Describe the RON that arose from the Chevron Case + transition to case studies

i. Case Studies on court rulings

1. Cases that support the rights of nature

i. Decision to prevent extraction of 846 million barrels of oil from Yasuni National Park. Decision made using multi-criteria assessment (NAIADE). Criteria: Social, economic, environmental and political aspects of issue. Final decision: Determined that keeping oil underground had higher value (combined economic, social, environmental) than extracting it.

i. Oil companies would like to extract oil from Ecuadorian Rainforest, Government does not want rainforest/indigenous peoples health damaged. Rainforest is treated as a human in courts, damage done to it by a company equivalent to damage done to human by another human

i. Chevron (known as Texaco) in the 1990s dumped oil waste in the Ecuadorian rainforests. For two decades, western lawyers worked tirelessly to sue Chevron in ecuadorian courts.

1. Cases that give power to industry and development instead of nature

1. The implications of these rulings

 

0. Framework & Process of Environmental Assessment

a. Steps, Agencies/People involved, Policies

b. Ministry of the Environment (MAE)

i. Public transparency policy

ii. Programs on their website for public use

c. President & Executive Orders

d. Justification of framework and/or process/conditions that lead to view point

e. Political Unrest

f. Debates over natural resource extraction involving indigenous people, and social advocacy

g. Present original framework and how it was or could be modified:

i. Adhere to Montreal Protocol

i. Met in Nov 2018 to revise

ii. 2017-2021 Land Development Plan (UN involvement)

5.Conclusion

a. Assess the effectiveness of the process and suggests changes

a. Use case studies to compare and contrast approach within region and/or elsewhere

a. Summary and ideas about what is needed next and future need to incorporate way of knowing

a. critical / critic style conclusion of process and future needs