$60.00 Part 2-3-4 Due in 8 Hours

OutGoingWeek8Assignment5VoIPPart3Powerpoint.docx

Home >Computer Science homework help >$60.00 Part 2-3-4 Due in 8 Hours

· Week 8 Assignment 5 - Submit Here

Students, please view the "Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment" in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 5: VoIP Part 3 (Quality) Due Week 8 and worth 100 points Suppose the VoIP project sponsor wants you to present the project to the board of directors. Particularly, the sponsor would like you to discuss the quality of the project. It is worth noting that during the deployment of the VoIP system the quality control team tracked forty (40) of the deployments. The following problems were documented:

· Five (5) of the deployments experienced delays due to the unique configuration of the office space which required modification to install the proper wiring.

· Twelve (12) of the users called the help desk to get additional training on the new system.

· Two (2) of the new devices were defective.

Prepare a fifteen to twenty (15-20) slide digital presentation with the software of your choice (e.g., PowerPoint, Google slides, Prezi, etc.) in which you:

1. Explain quality and its importance to project success.

1. Explain quality management planning.

1. Contrast quality assurance and quality control.

1. Describe the different quality activities involved in this project and each of their outcomes.

1. Describe Pareto diagrams and their use in project management.

1. Present the data in the provided scenario using a Pareto diagram (Use the software of your choosing to prepare the diagram).

1. Use appropriate key points and / or graphics to professionally convey the information.

1. Include presenter notes to explain each slide.

1. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

. Include the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date in the presentation.

. Include the references used in the assignment in the presentation.

. Import charts, graphs, and / or the Pareto diagram into the presentation. The completed works must be imported into the presentation.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

. Explain and defend the various quality factors in project quality.

. Use technology and information resources to research issues in IT project management.

. Write clearly and concisely about issues in IT project management using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 100	Assignment 5: VoIP Part 3 (Quality)
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Explain quality and its importance to project success. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletelyexplained quality and its importance to project success.	Partially explained quality and its importance to project success.	Satisfactorily explained quality and its importance to project success.	Thoroughly explained quality and its importance to project success.
2. Explain quality management planning. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletelyexplained quality management planning.	Partially explained quality management planning.	Satisfactorily explained quality management planning.	Thoroughly explained quality management planning.
3. Contrast quality assurance and quality control. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletelycontrasted quality assurance and quality control.	Partially contrasted quality assurance and quality control.	Satisfactorily contrasted quality assurance and quality control.	Thoroughly contrasted quality assurance and quality control.
4. Describe the different quality activities involved in this project and each of their outcomes. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletelydescribed the different quality activities involved in this project and each of their outcomes.	Partially described the different quality activities involved in this project and each of their outcomes.	Satisfactorily described the different quality activities involved in this project and each of their outcomes.	Thoroughly described the different quality activities involved in this project and each of their outcomes.
5. Describe Pareto diagrams and their use in project management. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletelydescribed Pareto diagrams and their use in project management.	Partially described Pareto diagrams and their use in project management.	Satisfactorily described Pareto diagrams and their use in project management.	Thoroughly described Pareto diagrams and their use in project management.
6. Present the data in the provided scenario using a Pareto diagram (Use the software of your choosing to prepare the diagram). Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletelypresented the data in the provided scenario using a Pareto diagram.	Partially presented the data in the provided scenario using a Pareto diagram.	Satisfactorily presented the data in the provided scenario using a Pareto diagram.	Thoroughly presented the data in the provided scenario using a Pareto diagram.
7. Use appropriate key points and / or graphics to professionally convey the information. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely used appropriate key points and / or graphics to professionally convey the information.	Partially used appropriate key points and / or graphics to professionally convey the information.	Satisfactorily used appropriate key points and / or graphics to professionally convey the information.	Thoroughly used appropriate key points and / or graphics to professionally convey the information.
8. Include presenter notes to explain each slide. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely included presenter notes to explain each slide.	Partially included presenter notes to explain each slide.	Satisfactorily included presenter notes to explain each slide.	Thoroughly included presenter notes to explain each slide.
9. 2 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.