Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis
aaluhaym
OriginalityReport222.pdf
4/9/2021 Originality Report
https://lms.seu.edu.sa/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=eadae5d8-334c-4991-9036-fd5a1a558d79&course_id=_85144_1… 1/6
%73
%23
%4
SafeAssign Originality Report (Current Semester - الفصل الحالي)HCM-506: Applied Biostatistics in Heal… • Turnitin Plagiarism Checker
%100Total Score: High riskKHALID ALMUHANA Submission UUID: ce03d032-5e91-0f02-42c2-e32cce11e113
Total Number of Reports
1 Highest Match
100 % Cox1.docx
Average Match
100 % Submitted on
04/09/21 03:53 PM GMT+3
Average Word Count
658 Highest: Cox1.docx
%100Attachment 1
Institutional database (7)
Student paper Student paper Student paper
Student paper Student paper Student paper
Student paper
Internet (6)
operativeneurosurgery reverseplays maissana
fraggo echantillonboutique openclassrooms
Global database (1)
Student paper
Top sources (3)
Excluded sources (0)
View Originality Report - Old Design
Word Count: 658 Cox1.docx
10 7 8
9 14 13
11
6 3 5
2 1 12
4
10 Student paper 7 Student paper 8 Student paper
4/9/2021 Originality Report
https://lms.seu.edu.sa/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=eadae5d8-334c-4991-9036-fd5a1a558d79&course_id=_85144_1… 2/6
Source Matches (34)
echantillonboutique 100% fraggo 87%
Title: Cox Proportional Hazards Regression
Name: Date:
Cox's proportional hazards model
The Cox's proportional hazards model for survival-time (time-to-event) outcomes on one or more predictors. it is method for investigating the effect of sev-
eral variables upon the time a specified event takes to happen. The method does not assume any particular "survival model" but it is not truly nonparamet-
ric because it does assume that the effects of the predictor variables upon survival are constant over time and are additive in one scale. Provided that the assump- tions of Cox regression are met, this function will provide better estimates of survival probabilities and cumulative hazard than those provided by the Kaplan-Meier function. it is frequently used in the survival analysis with time to event, it is the one of the part of the survival analysis. Summary statistics (Events):
Total observed Total failed Total censored Time steps
12 10 2 10
From the above table we can see that the number of observations are greater than the number of observed times. It is therefore, the outcomes/results are the same for both methods, does not if we use Breslow method or effron method. In ANOVA and liner regression, these results are equivalent to the analysis of variance
table and to the R2. On the log ratio the most critical/important value to consider is the probability of chi-square. Test of the null hypothesis H0: beta=0:
Statistic DF Chi-square Pr > Chi²
-2 Log(Likelihood) 1 2.68204572 0.101
Score 1 2.853195469 0.091
Wald 1 2.575047366 0.109
This is parallel to the Fisher's F test: we attempt to assess if the variables bring critical information by looking at the model as it is characterized with a sim-
pler model with no effect of the covariates. For this situation, as the probability is lower than 0.05, we can presume that significant information is brought by the vari- ables. Let conduct Cox's proportional hazards model to check the following hypothesis. Null Hypothesis H0: There is no relation between the risks of dying
to the patient treatment group. Alternative Hypothesis H1: The risk of dying is related to the patient treatment group. Regression coefficients:
Variable Value Standard error Wald Chi-Square Pr > Chi² Hazard ratio Hazard ratio Lower bound (95%) Hazard ratio Upper bound (95%)
Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo) 1.200 0.748 2.575 0.109 3.319 0.767 14.370
From the output of the test p value (0.2742) is less than 0.05 crashes to reject the null hypothesis and concluded that the risk of dying isn't identified with the pa-
tient treatment group. Additionally we could not found any association between risk of dying and the patient treatment group. Proportionality test:
Variable rho Chi-square Pr > Chi²
Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo) 0.072059817 0.047494834 0.827
Global
0.047494834 0.827
By looking at chi-squares probability on this table we come to know that the variable most influencing survival time is Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo). This
shows that the Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo) of the patient has a tremendous effect on survival time at start of the study. As the exponential of the parameter
estimate the hazard ratio is acquired. The p-value is greater than alpha = 0.05 It can be seen for all the covariates, it shows that there is no violation of the pro-
portional risk assumption. The there is no variable covariate with a significant impact is the age this study has shown that. The risk increases by 1.13 (Haz-
ard ratio) each time we take a year the associated coefficient being positive. On the survival time the other covariates do not have a significant effect.
References: Jr., F. E. (2015). Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model. springer. O. O. Aalen. (2003) Further results on the non-parametric linear regression
model in survival analysis.
1
2
3 4
5 6
7
8
7
8
7
7
9
7 10
7 11
12 7
13 8
9
10
7
9
9
10 7
8
7
14 10
8
8
1
Student paper
Cox Proportional Hazards Regression
Original source
Cox proportional hazards regression
2
Student paper
Cox's proportional hazards model
Original source
Cox's proportional hazards regression model
4/9/2021 Originality Report
https://lms.seu.edu.sa/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=eadae5d8-334c-4991-9036-fd5a1a558d79&course_id=_85144_1… 3/6
reverseplays 91%
Student paper 82%
maissana 100%
operativeneurosurgery 93%
Student paper 86%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 90%
Student paper 88%
3
Student paper
The Cox's proportional hazards model for survival-time (time-to-event) out- comes on one or more predictors.
Original source
This function fits Cox's proportional haz- ards model for survival-time (time-to- event) outcomes on one or more predictors
4
Student paper
it is method for investigating the effect of several variables upon the time a spe- cified event takes to happen.
Original source
This model can be defined as a “method for investigating the effect of several vari- ables upon the time a specified event takes to happen
5
Student paper
The method does not assume any partic- ular "survival model"
Original source
The method does not assume any partic- ular "survival model"
6
Student paper
but it is not truly nonparametric because it does assume that the effects of the predictor variables upon survival are constant over time and are additive in one scale. Provided that the assumptions of Cox regression are met, this function will provide better estimates of survival probabilities and cumulative hazard than those provided by the Kaplan-Meier function.
Original source
The method does not assume any partic- ular “survival model” but it is not truly nonparametric because it does assume that the effects of the predictor variables upon survival are constant over time and are additive in one scale Provided that the assumptions of Cox regression are met, this function will provide better es- timates of survival probabilities and cu- mulative hazard than those provided by the Kaplan-Meier function
7
Student paper
it is frequently used in the survival ana- lysis with time to event, it is the one of the part of the survival analysis. Sum- mary statistics (Events):
Original source
is frequently used in the survival analysis with time to the event Summary statistics (Events)
8
Student paper
Total observed Total failed Total cen- sored Time steps
Original source
Total observed Total failed Total cen- sored Time steps
7
Student paper
12 10 2 10
Original source
12 10 2 10
8
Student paper
In ANOVA and liner regression, these res- ults are equivalent to the analysis of vari- ance table and to the R2.
Original source
These results are equivalent to the R2 and to the analysis of variance table in linear regression and ANOVA
7
Student paper
On the log ratio the most critical/important value to consider is the probability of chi-square. Test of the null hypothesis H0:
Original source
The most important value to look at is the probability of the Chi-square test on the log Test of the null hypothesis H0
4/9/2021 Originality Report
https://lms.seu.edu.sa/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=eadae5d8-334c-4991-9036-fd5a1a558d79&course_id=_85144_1… 4/6
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 76%
Student paper 66%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
openclassrooms 70%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
7
Student paper
Statistic DF Chi-square Pr >
Original source
Statistic DF Chi-square Pr >
9
Student paper
-2 Log(Likelihood) 1 2.68204572 0.101 Score 1 2.853195469 0.091 Wald 1 2.575047366 0.109
Original source
-2 Log(Likelihood) 1 2.68204572 0.101 Score 1 2.853195469 0.091 Wald 1 2.575047366 0.109
7
Student paper
This is parallel to the Fisher's F test:
Original source
This is equivalent to the Fisher's F test
10
Student paper
we attempt to assess if the variables bring critical information by looking at the model as it is characterized with a simpler model with no effect of the cov- ariates. For this situation, as the probab- ility is lower than 0.05, we can presume that significant information is brought by the variables.
Original source
we try to evaluate if the variables bring significant information by comparing the model as it is defined with a simpler model with no impact of the covariates In this case, as the probability is lesser than 0.05, we can accomplish that important info is carried by the variables
7
Student paper
Let conduct Cox's proportional hazards model to check the following hypothesis.
Original source
Let conduct Cox's proportional hazards model to check the following hypothesis
11
Student paper
Null Hypothesis H0:
Original source
Null Hypothesis (H0)
12
Student paper
Alternative Hypothesis H1:
Original source
The alternative hypothesis is
7
Student paper
The risk of dying is related to the patient treatment group.
Original source
The risk of dying is related to the patient treatment group
13
Student paper
Variable Value Standard error Wald Chi- Square Pr >
Original source
Variable Value Standard error Wald Chi- Square Pr >
8
Student paper
Chi² Hazard ratio Hazard ratio Lower bound (95%) Hazard ratio Upper bound (95%)
Original source
Chi² Hazard ratio Hazard ratio Lower bound (95%) Hazard ratio Upper bound (95%)
9
Student paper
Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo) 1.200 0.748 2.575 0.109 3.319 0.767 14.370
Original source
Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo) 1.200 0.748 2.575 0.109 3.319 0.767 14.370
4/9/2021 Originality Report
https://lms.seu.edu.sa/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=eadae5d8-334c-4991-9036-fd5a1a558d79&course_id=_85144_1… 5/6
Student paper 93%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 90%
Student paper 74%
Student paper 85%
Student paper 74%
Student paper 82%
Student paper 86%
10
Student paper
From the output of the test p value (0.2742) is less than 0.05 crashes to reject the null hypothesis and concluded that the risk of dying isn't identified with the patient treatment group. Additionally we could not found any association between risk of dying and the patient treatment group.
Original source
From the output of the test p value (0.2742) is less than 0.05 fails to reject the null hypothesis and concluded that the risk of dying is not related to the pa- tient treatment group Additionally we could not found any association between risk of dying and the patient treatment group
7
Student paper
Variable rho Chi-square Pr >
Original source
Variable rho Chi-square Pr >
9
Student paper
Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo) 0.072059817 0.047494834 0.827
Original source
Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo) 0.072059817 0.047494834 0.827
9
Student paper
0.047494834 0.827
Original source
0.047494834 0.827
10
Student paper
By looking at chi-squares probability on this table we come to know that the vari- able most influencing survival time is Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo).
Original source
On this table, we can see from looking at the probability of the Chi-squares that the variable most influencing survival time is Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo)
7
Student paper
This shows that the Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo) of the patient has a tremendous effect on survival time at start of the study.
Original source
Group (1 Chemo or 2 Placebo) of the pa- tient at the beginning of the study has a significant effect
8
Student paper
As the exponential of the parameter es- timate the hazard ratio is acquired.
Original source
The hazard ratio is obtained as the expo- nential of the parameter estimate
7
Student paper
The p-value is greater than alpha = 0.05 It can be seen for all the covariates, it shows that there is no violation of the proportional risk assumption.
Original source
It can be noted that for all the covariates, the p-value is greater than alpha = 0.05
14
Student paper
The there is no variable covariate with a significant impact is the age this study has shown that.
Original source
This study has shown that the only cov- ariate with a significant impact is the age
10
Student paper
The risk increases by 1.13 (Hazard ratio) each time we take a year the associated coefficient being positive.
Original source
The related coefficient presence positive, however, the risk increases by 1.13 (Haz- ard ratio) each time we take a year
4/9/2021 Originality Report
https://lms.seu.edu.sa/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=eadae5d8-334c-4991-9036-fd5a1a558d79&course_id=_85144_1… 6/6
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
8
Student paper
On the survival time the other covariates do not have a significant effect.
Original source
The other covariates do not have a signi- ficant effect on the survival time
8
Student paper
Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model.
Original source
Cox proportional hazards regression model
