ERM 10 Due in 24 hours

%100

SafeAssign Originality Report CPSS/418: Prevention And Treatment Interventions • Wk 2 - Objectives of Assessment Paper [due Mon]

%100Total Score: High riskKathryn Millan Submission UUID: eba834e6-27f8-d500-244d-cea8b8e5edb1

Total Number of Reports

1 Highest Match

100 % Objectives of Assesment.docx

Average Match

100 % Submitted on

11/05/19 10:09 PM MST

Average Word Count

1,003 Highest: Objectives of Assesment.docx

%100Additional content

Institutional database (1)

Student paper

Top sources (1)

Excluded sources (0)

View Originality Report - Old Design

Word Count: 1,003 Objectives of Assesment.docx

1

1 Student paper

Running Head: OBJECTIVES OF ASSESSMENT 1

OBJECTIVES OF ASSESSMENT 2

Objectives of Assessment

Kathryn Millan

CPSS/418

November 4, 2019

Becky Day

Objectives of Assessment

Multidimensional and convergent validation models are approaches through which assessment can be evaluated and later weighed in relation to its degree of conformity to expectations that are laid down in theory. The multi-dimension in scientific assessments is established based on the standards which are developed through the relation of the dimensional construct with the relating concepts in the industry. So before the assessment is done, there needs to be completed examinations that will focus on the underlying theories as well as registered practical standards. These variables can then be compared to the actual eventualities of the validation models thereof (Prilleltensky et al, 2015). Through these validation guidelines, traits related to the approach are based on psychometrics. The individuals under examination in these models need to be measured directly. Therefore if the measurability of these parameters is not directly possible, then the

variables may be adversely altered. For the tests to be conducted, and the results established accurately, the inferences of the personnel undertaking the evaluations have to be limited to usefulness evaluation (Way et al, 2015). Throughout the assessments, inferences have to be continuously made concerning the theoretical findings available for comparison. The convergent model includes the measurement of the techniques and demonstrations, and this is strongly relating the aspects associated with these essentials. Thus, through these models of assessment, the objectives are strictly confined to the activities that build-up to the aspect of relational truth, which is established through undertaking the steps that build-up to the ultimate results. This process is hence more of a comparative process rather than a fact-finding or fact evaluation. This is due to the fact that assessment in this process is done through comparative assessment. Defensiveness can be said to be taking an offensive position with regard to a logical discussion and as a result making deliberate attempts to avert a reality. This objective is sought after through the avoidance of introspection. The individual intending to actuate this technique aims to attack the proponent of a particular argument, and through this attack approach, they can be able to avert the attack on themselves in the process (Oeij et al, 2016). This technique can be summarized as defending by attacking, which, to many, is regarded as a popular form of psychological stance despite the various arguments challenging its logic and intellectual. Denial and defensiveness offer a type of egocentricity and are aimed at the protection of self-esteem, which can be regarded as fragile. This fragility in self-esteem can be attributed to the individual awareness of self-contradiction and delusion. These delusions, in extreme cases, can be caused into guilt and self-blame. Once these aspects of an individual’s character kick in, they bring about a sense of denial and eventual defensiveness. These aspects of one’s style can be classified as personality malfunctions. These malfunctions come about mostly due to mistakes committed and the resulting unwillingness to acceptance of the errors as well as the commitment to the remedy for these mistakes Actions directed towards these eventualities are usually damaging to one’s reputation and character Self delusion and unacceptance of errors hence

1

1

1

1

Source Matches (24)

Student paper 93%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 92%

Student paper 100%

these mistakes. Actions directed towards these eventualities are usually damaging to one’s reputation and character. Self-delusion and unacceptance of errors hence breed these actions. These dysfunctions are not limited to personality and style but rather span more extensive than the individual and therefore can as well affect information analysis and assessment undertakings. Program delivery methods and assessment models have to be correlated to an acceptable extent below, which they do not promote optimal operations. Thus designs of these parameters of a data analysis environment need precision design mechanisms to enhance optimality. During the design phase of the program delivery models, the assessment models have to be taken into consideration to increase efficiency. The program delivery methods that support assessment models are based upon the relational operational standards that are to be established in relation to the assessment model to be used in a specific undertaking. An optimal program delivery model has to be one that incorporates the continuous learning and continuous development style of data analysis and data processing (Steinhoff et al, 2016). Once the program is in place, and its utilization started to take place, the program should be flexible enough to accept later inputs. These following inputs are based upon the analysis of the program delivery model that is in operation already. Once these analyses have been made the necessary customizations, as well as general optimizations, can be affected to enhance compatibility to the intended assessment model to enable smooth take over from the program delivery phase to the assessment phase.

References

Callan, G. L., & Cleary, T. J. (2018). Multidimensional assessment of self-regulated learning with middle school math students. School Psychology Quarterly,

33(1), 103. Retrieved from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-14090-001

Oeij, P., Dhondt, S., Gaspersz, J., & Van Vuuren, T. (2016). Defensive behaviours in innovation teams–how project teams discuss defensiveness and its relationship

with innovation resilience behaviour and project success. Language, 4(2), 8. Retrieved from:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312604349_Defensive_behaviours_in_innovation_team_how_project_teams_discuss_defensiveness_and_its_relationship_wit h_innovation_resilience_behaviour_and_project_success

Prilleltensky, I., Dietz, S., Prilleltensky, O., Myers, N. D., Rubenstein, C. L., Jin, Y., & McMahon, A. (2015). Assessing multidimensional well‐being: Development and

validation of the I COPPE scale. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(2), 199-226. Retrieved from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-03905-007

Steinhoff, L., & Palmatier, R. W. (2016). Understanding loyalty program effectiveness: managing target and bystander effects. Journal of the Academy of

Marketing Science, 44(1), 88-107. Retrieved from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-58302-006

Way, S. A., Tracey, J. B., Fay, C. H., Wright, P. M., Snell, S. A., Chang, S., & Gong, Y. (2015). Validation of a multidimensional HR flexibility measure. Journal of

Management, 41(4), 1098-1131. Retrieved from: ttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206312463940

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

Student paper

OBJECTIVES OF ASSESSMENT 1 OBJECTIVES OF ASSESSMENT 2 Objectives of Assessment

Original source

Objectives of Assessment OBJECTIVES OF ASSESSMENT 2 Objectives of Assessment

1

Student paper

November 4, 2019

Original source

November 4, 2019

1

Student paper

Objectives of Assessment Multidimensional and convergent validation models are approaches through which assessment can be evaluated and later weighed in relation to its degree of conformity to expectations that are laid down in theory. The multi-dimension in scientific assessments is established based on the standards which are developed through the relation of the dimensional construct with the relating concepts in the industry. So before the assessment is done, there needs to be completed examinations that will focus on the underlying theories as well as registered practical standards.

Original source

Objectives of Assessment Multidimensional and convergent validation models are approaches through which assessment can be evaluated and hence weighed concerning its degree of conformity to expectations that are laid down in theory The multi- dimension in scientific assessments is established based on the standards which are established through the relation of the dimensional construct with the relating concepts in the industry Hence before the assessment is done, there needs to be done examinations that will focus on the underlying theories as well as registered empirical standards

1

Student paper

These variables can then be compared to the actual eventualities of the validation models thereof (Prilleltensky et al, 2015). Through these validation guidelines, traits related to the approach are based on psychometrics.

Original source

these variables can then be compared to the actual eventualities of the validation models thereof (Prilleltensky et al, 2015) Through these validation guidelines, traits related to the approach are based on psychometrics

Student paper 84%

Student paper 90%

Student paper 98%

Student paper 95%

Student paper 88%

Student paper 82%

1

Student paper

Therefore if the measurability of these parameters is not directly possible, then the variables may be adversely altered. For the tests to be conducted, and the results established accurately, the inferences of the personnel undertaking the evaluations have to be limited to usefulness evaluation (Way et al, 2015). Throughout the assessments, inferences have to be continuously made concerning the theoretical findings available for comparison. The convergent model includes the measurement of the techniques and demonstrations, and this is strongly relating the aspects associated with these essentials.

Original source

The entities under analysis in these models need to be measured directly and thus if the measurability of these parameters is not directly possible then the variables may be adversely altered For the tests to be conducted and the results established accurately, the inferences of the personnel undertaking the evaluations have to be limited to usefulness evaluation (Way et al, 2015) Throughout the evaluations, inferences have to be constantly made about the theoretical findings available for comparison The convergent model includes the measurement of the techniques and demonstrations and this strongly correlating the aspects associated with these essentials

1

Student paper

Thus, through these models of assessment, the objectives are strictly confined to the activities that build-up to the aspect of relational truth, which is established through undertaking the steps that build-up to the ultimate results. This process is hence more of a comparative process rather than a fact- finding or fact evaluation. This is due to the fact that assessment in this process is done through comparative assessment. Defensiveness can be said to be taking an offensive position with regard to a logical discussion and as a result making deliberate attempts to avert a reality.

Original source

Thus, through these models of assessment, the objectives are strictly confined to the activities that build-up to the aspect of relational truth which is established through undertaking the steps that build-up to the ultimate results This process is thus more of a comparative process rather than a fact- finding or fact evaluation This is because assessment in this process is done through comparative assessment Defensiveness can be said to be taking an offensive position concerning a logical discussion and thus making deliberate attempts to avert a reality

1

Student paper

This objective is sought after through the avoidance of introspection. The individual intending to actuate this technique aims to attack the proponent of a particular argument, and through this attack approach, they can be able to avert the attack on themselves in the process (Oeij et al, 2016). This technique can be summarized as defending by attacking, which, to many, is regarded as a popular form of psychological stance despite the various arguments challenging its logic and intellectual. Denial and defensiveness offer a type of egocentricity and are aimed at the protection of self-esteem, which can be regarded as fragile.

Original source

This objective is sought after through the avoidance of introspection The individual intending to actuate this technique seeks to attack the proponent of a particular argument and through this attack approach, they can be able to avert the attack on themselves in the process (Oeij et al, 2016) This technique can be summarized as defending by attacking, which to many is regarded as a popular form of psychological stance despite the various arguments challenging its logic and intellectual Denial and defensiveness offer a form of egocentricity and are aimed at the protection of self-esteem which can be regarded as fragile

1

Student paper

This fragility in self-esteem can be attributed to the individual awareness of self-contradiction and delusion. These delusions, in extreme cases, can be caused into guilt and self-blame. Once these aspects of an individual’s character kick in, they bring about a sense of denial and eventual defensiveness. These aspects of one’s style can be classified as personality malfunctions.

Original source

This fragility in self-esteem can be attributed to the individual awareness of self-contradiction and delusion These delusions in extreme cases can be bred into guilt and self-blame Once these aspects of an individual's character kick in, they bring about a sense of denial and eventual defensiveness These aspects of one’s character can be classified as personality malfunctions

1

Student paper

These malfunctions come about mostly due to mistakes committed and the resulting unwillingness to acceptance of the errors as well as the commitment to the remedy for these mistakes. Actions directed towards these eventualities are usually damaging to one’s reputation and character. Self-delusion and unacceptance of errors hence breed these actions. These dysfunctions are not limited to personality and style but rather span more extensive than the individual and therefore can as well affect information analysis and assessment undertakings.

Original source

These malfunctions come about mostly due to mistakes committed and the resulting unwillingness to acceptance of the mistakes as well as the commitment to the remedy for these mistakes Actions directed towards these eventualities are usually detrimental to one’s reputation and character Self-delusion and unacceptance of mistakes hence breed these actions These dysfunctions are not limited to personality and character but rather span wider than the individual and hence can as well affect information analysis and assessment undertakings

1

Student paper

Program delivery methods and assessment models have to be correlated to an acceptable extent below, which they do not promote optimal operations. Thus designs of these parameters of a data analysis environment need precision design mechanisms to enhance optimality. During the design phase of the program delivery models, the assessment models have to be taken into consideration to increase efficiency. The program delivery methods that support assessment models are based upon the relational operational standards that are to be established in relation to the assessment model to be used in a specific undertaking.

Original source

Program delivery methods and assessment models have to be correlated to an acceptable extent below which they do not promote optimal operations, and thus designs of these parameters of a data analysis environment need precision design mechanisms to enhance optimality Program delivery methods and assessment models have to be correlated to an acceptable extent below which they do not promote optimal operations, and thus designs of these parameters of a data analysis environment need precision design mechanisms to enhance optimality During the design phase of the program delivery models, the assessment models have to be taken into consideration to enhance efficiency The program delivery methods that support assessment models are based upon the relational operational standards that are to be established with the assessment model to be used in a specific undertaking

Student paper 98%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 94%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

1

Student paper

An optimal program delivery model has to be one that incorporates the continuous learning and continuous development style of data analysis and data processing (Steinhoff et al, 2016). Once the program is in place, and its utilization started to take place, the program should be flexible enough to accept later inputs. These following inputs are based upon the analysis of the program delivery model that is in operation already. Once these analyses have been made the necessary customizations, as well as general optimizations, can be affected to enhance compatibility to the intended assessment model to enable smooth take over from the program delivery phase to the assessment phase.

Original source

An optimal program delivery model has to be one that incorporates the continuous learning and continuous development style of data analysis and data processing (Steinhoff et al, 2016) Once the program is in place and its utilization started to take place, the program should be flexible enough to accept later inputs These later inputs are based upon the analysis of the program delivery model that is in operation already Once these analyses have been made the necessary customizations, as well as general optimizations, can be affected to enhance compatibility to the intended assessment model to enable smooth take over from the program delivery phase to the assessment phase

1

Student paper

L., & Cleary, T.

Original source

L., & Cleary, T

1

Student paper

Multidimensional assessment of self- regulated learning with middle school math students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 103.

Original source

Multidimensional assessment of self- regulated learning with middle school math students School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 103

1

Student paper

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017- 14090-001 Oeij, P., Dhondt, S., Gaspersz, J., & Van Vuuren, T.

Original source

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017- 14090-001 Oeij, P., Dhondt, S., Gaspersz, J., & Van Vuuren, T

1

Student paper

Defensive behaviours in innovation teams–how project teams discuss defensiveness and its relationship with innovation resilience behaviour and project success. Language, 4(2), 8.

Original source

Defensive behaviors in innovation teams–how project teams discuss defensiveness and its relationship with innovation resilience behavior and project success Language, 4(2), 8

1

Student paper

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio n/312604349_Defensive_behaviours_in_i nnovation_team_how_project_teams_disc uss_defensiveness_and_its_relationship_ with_innovation_resilience_behaviour_an d_project_success Prilleltensky, I., Dietz, S., Prilleltensky, O., Myers, N. D., Rubenstein, C. L., Jin, Y., & McMahon, A.

Original source

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio n/312604349_Defensive_behaviours_in_i nnovation_team_how_project_teams_disc uss_defensiveness_and_its_relationship_ with_innovation_resilience_behaviour_an d_project_success Prilleltensky, I., Dietz, S., Prilleltensky, O., Myers, N D., Rubenstein, C L., Jin, Y., & McMahon, A

1

Student paper

Assessing multidimensional well‐being: Development and validation of the I COPPE scale. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(2), 199-226.

Original source

Assessing multidimensional well‐being Development and validation of the I COPPE scale Journal of Community Psychology, 43(2), 199-226

1

Student paper

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015- 03905-007 Steinhoff, L., & Palmatier, R.

Original source

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015- 03905-007 Steinhoff, L., & Palmatier, R

1

Student paper

Understanding loyalty program effectiveness: managing target and bystander effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 88- 107.

Original source

Understanding loyalty program effectiveness managing target and bystander effects Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 88-107

1

Student paper

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015- 58302-006

Original source

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015- 58302-006

1

Student paper

A., Tracey, J. B., Fay, C. H., Wright, P. M., Snell, S.

Original source

A., Tracey, J B., Fay, C H., Wright, P M., Snell, S

1

Student paper

A., Chang, S., & Gong, Y.

Original source

A., Chang, S., & Gong, Y

1

Student paper

Validation of a multidimensional HR flexibility measure. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1098-1131.

Original source

Validation of a multidimensional HR flexibility measure Journal of Management, 41(4), 1098-1131

1

Student paper

ttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177 /0149206312463940

Original source

ttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177 /0149206312463940