. NURS 5052/NURS 6052/NURS 6052N/NRSE 6052C/NURS 6052C/NURS 5052C/NURS 6052A/NRSE 6052A: Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice

OriginalityReport.pdf

Home >Nursing homework help >. NURS 5052/NURS 6052/NURS 6052N/NRSE 6052C/NURS 6052C/NURS 5052C/NURS 6052A/NRSE 6052A: Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice

12/19/2020 Originality Report

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=bf799a18-750b-44ae-9908-c199cb985e41&course_id=_16767218_1&inclu… 1/5

%26

%24

SafeAssign Originality Report NURS-6052C-14/NURS-6052N-14-Essent of Evidence-Based Pract202… • SafeAssign Drafts

%50Total Score: High riskEdelis Morales Submission UUID: 52b2ed19-6a99-18fa-58ca-289554bbab28

Total Number of Reports

1 Highest Match

50 % 60525062--assig#2-week#3.doc

Average Match

50 % Submitted on

12/19/20 05:00 PM EST

Average Word Count

1,188 Highest: 60525062--assig#2-week#3.doc

%50Attachment 1

Internet (4)

academicscope cebma csu

academicscope

Institutional database (7)

Student paper Student paper Student paper

Student paper

Top sources (3)

Excluded sources (0)

View Originality Report - Old Design

Word Count: 1,188 60525062--assig#2-week#3.doc

8 9 3

7 4 2

6 11 5

8 academicscope 7 Student paper 9 cebma

Edelis Morales

NURS 5052/NURS 6052: Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice

Instructor: Christine Frazer

12/21/2020 Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types

and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108.

doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J. (2013). Understanding quantitative research: Part 2. Nursing

Standard, 27(18), 48–55. doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c9488

Hoe, J., & Hoare, Z. (2012). Understanding quantitative research: Part 1. Nursing

Standard, 27(15), 52–57. doi:10.7748/ns2012.12.27.15.52.c9485

Melnyk, B. M., &Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing &

healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer

Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue

of interest) This article is relevant because it shifts away from focusing on evidence-based materials and instead discusses how to analyze the reviews on such materi-

3 3

4 4

4 5

4 4

6 4

12/19/2020 Originality Report

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=bf799a18-750b-44ae-9908-c199cb985e41&course_id=_16767218_1&inclu… 2/5

of interest) This article is relevant because it shifts away from focusing on evidence based materials and instead discusses how to analyze the reviews on such materi als. The article relates to best practices in caring for psychiatric patients in the way it handles the examination of reviews on related source materials.

This article is relevant as it recognizes statistical language as part of quantitative methodology and it focuses on the handling of source materials that discuss evi- dence-based practice in nursing.

This article is relevant as it delves into the examination of source materials that apply quantitative methodology-something that may be overlooked by other authors because it seems simple. This article relates to best practice in nursing as it deals with sources on evidence-based practice.

This article is relevant as it discusses how to examine source materials that use a mixed-methods approach. The article is important as it analyzes sources that demonstrate the implementation and sustenance of evidence-based practice in nursing.

Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article The aim of research for this article was to look into the familiar examples of reviews

about health care. The study’s objective was to come up with a reliable insight of review through illustration using those found in domains for health and health infor- mation.

This research aimed to offer a relevant introduction to familiar statistical language and the perception of statistics in articles of research. The research aimed to offer the reader information on the relevance of looking into the appropriateness of tests carried out and carefully interpreting data.

The aim of this research by Hoe and Zoare (2012) is to allow nurses to have the capacity to appraise and examine quantitative research articles efficiently by offering knowledge on common quantitative research methods used in different source materials. This research aims to reveal to nurses how to find, read, and examine evi- dence regardless of whether it is as private publication, systemic review, outcomes management reports, meta-analysis, or as a best practice guideline. It aims at showing how to make use of several databases and websites on health.

Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be

specific. The research methodology used in the article by Grant and Booth (2009) was a scoping search followed by an analysis of the keywords related to the review and synthesis of the literature. The authors relied on their combined experience in the theory and practice of reviews to examine the language used in the

source materials in question that included published documents and unpublished literature. The research methodology used a simple analytical framework to ana- lyze the main review types.

The frequent review types and their related major characteristics were highlighted and placed against a Search, Appraisal, and Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA)

framework. This examination revealed the characteristics of each of the review types together with their strength and weaknesses. Furthermore, examples of the re- spective reviews were highlighted mainly because of their efficiency in demonstrating review characteristics. In this case, the methodology used in the study was a mixed methods approach since it applied the use of both quantitative and qualitative data relating to the methodologies used in the reviews selected.

The research methodology used in this research article included the identification of relevant statistical terms related to the presentation of statistical data in research that applies quantitative methodology. In this case, the methodology used was qualitative research since the data collected and analyzed was non-numerical. Al- though the data used related to curves, graphs, and flowcharts, the use of these was relevant to understanding the concepts related to statistics.

The research methodology used is the identification of key questions for the critical appraisal of research evidence related to quantitative research methodology.

The research uses information from other peer-reviewed articles that rely on quantitative research to come up with their findings. In this case, the methodology used by the authors is a qualitative methodology where the data used is non-numerical. The research methodology for this research is the use of posters, presentations, and publications as the basis of study for analyzing source materials. The methodology used in this research is a mixed-methods approach since it applies the use of both numerical and non-numerical data.

A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of

the peer-reviewed articles you selected. The use of the SALSA framework to examine the selected review types by the authors promoted the reliability and validity of the study since this framework is relevant for the systematic analysis of data acquired through a mixed-methods approach. The use of this framework resulted in the attainment of useful outcomes in and for the research.

The research methodology was relevant since it highlighted several terms and scientific processes related to statistics. The research methodology offered examples to explain some of the terms presented in the article to promote comprehension of the terms. The use of examples further served to promote the validity and reliability of the information presented by the authors by allowing the reader to see how true they were in the way they were used and/or applied by other researchers.

The strength of the research methodology applied by Hoe and Zoare (2012) is that it addresses most of the key terms and the language used in quantitative method- ology. As a result, it answers the related questions efficiently and in a manner that nurses can understand and apply as they evaluate source materials.

The strength of the research methodology is that it embraces the use of both qualitative and quantitative data and this is a form of recognition that evidence-based practiced may be in the form of both numeric and non-numeric data. Additionally, the research methodology embraces evidence as the basis of best practice in the nursing profession.

General Notes/Comments NIL

NIL NIL NIL

Matrix Worksheet Template

12/19/2020 Originality Report

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=bf799a18-750b-44ae-9908-c199cb985e41&course_id=_16767218_1&inclu… 3/5

Source Matches (23)

academicscope 100%

Student paper 88%

csu 67%

csu 79%

csu 83%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 90%

Student paper 100%

Student paper

Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice

Original source

essentials of evidence-based practice |

Student paper

12/21/2020 Full citation of selected arti- cle Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4

Original source

Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4

Student paper

J., & Booth, A.

Original source

and Booth, A

Student paper

A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types

Original source

(2009), A typology of reviews an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies

Student paper

Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471- 1842.2009.00848.x

Original source

Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108 doi:10.1111/j.1471- 1842.2009.00848.x Books on Literature Reviews Doing a Literature Review by Christopher Hart ISBN

Student paper

Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J.

Original source

Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J

Student paper

Understanding quantitative research:

Original source

Understanding quantitative research

Student paper

Standard, 27(18), 48–55.

Original source

Nursing Standard, 27(18), 48–55

Student paper

doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c9488

Original source

doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c9488

Student paper

Hoe, J., & Hoare, Z.

Original source

Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J

Student paper

Understanding quantitative research:

Original source

Understanding quantitative research

12/19/2020 Originality Report

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=bf799a18-750b-44ae-9908-c199cb985e41&course_id=_16767218_1&inclu… 4/5

Student paper 92%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 86%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 74%

Student paper 66%

academicscope 100%

cebma 63%

cebma 65%

Student paper

Standard, 27(15), 52–57. doi:10.7748/ns2012.12.27.15.52.c9485

Original source

Nursing Standard, 27(15), 52–57 10.7748/ns2012.12.27.15.52.c9485

Student paper

M., &Fineout-Overholt, E.

Original source

M., & Fineout-Overholt, E

Student paper

Evidence-based practice in nursing &

Original source

Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare

Student paper

A guide to best practice (4th ed.).

Original source

A guide to best practice (4th ed.)

Student paper

Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (in- clude a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) This article is relevant because it shifts away from focusing on evidence- based materials and instead discusses how to analyze the reviews on such materials.

Original source

Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (in- clude a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) I chose this article because if was based on the handover of responsi- bility from one professional to another

Student paper

Brief description of the aims of the re- search of each peer-reviewed article The aim of research for this article was to look into the familiar examples of re- views about health care.

Original source

Brief description of the aims of the re- search of each peer-reviewed article The aim of the research was to find out how effective patient handover was in rural health care facilities

Student paper

Brief description of the research method- ology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quan- titative, or a mixed-methods approach.

Original source

Brief description of the research method- ology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quan- titative, or a mixed-methods approach

Student paper

The authors relied on their combined ex- perience in the theory and practice of re- views to examine the language used in the source materials in question that in- cluded published documents and unpub- lished literature.

Original source

Method After initial scoping searches of the literature, the authors drew on their combined experience of 26 years of hav- ing worked with both the theory and practice of reviews in multifarious guises to examine the vocabulary used in the published literature, unpublished docu- ments and other source material

Student paper

The frequent review types and their relat- ed major characteristics were highlighted and placed against a Search, Appraisal, and Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) framework.

Original source

31 From this, common review types and their associated key attributes were iden- tified and mapped against a Search, Ap- praisal, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) framework

12/19/2020 Originality Report

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/mdb-sa-BBLEARN/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=bf799a18-750b-44ae-9908-c199cb985e41&course_id=_16767218_1&inclu… 5/5

academicscope 100%

Student paper 81%

Student paper 100%8

Student paper

A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Original source

Student paper

General Notes/Comments NIL

Original source

General Notes/Comments

Student paper

Original source