Psychotherapy With group
Ife
originality.pdf
%%94
%%6
SafeAssign Originality Report NRNP-6650-14,Psychotherapy Group/Fam.2020 F… • SafeAssign Drafts
%%100To t a l S c o r eTo t a l S c o r e:: High risk adesola turner
Submission UUID: 10deb9ea-1e9b-fa6c-03b3-0309d114ea9d
To t a l N u m b e r o f R eTo t a l N u m b e r o f R e……
1 H i g h e s t M a t c hH i g h e s t M a t c h
100 % Wk6Assgn.TurnerA.NRN…
A v e r a g e M a t c hA v e r a g e M a t c h
100 % S u b m i t t e d o nS u b m i t t e d o n
10/11/20 11:31 PM CDT
A v e r a g e W o r d C o u n tA v e r a g e W o r d C o u n t
1,000 Highest: Wk6Assgn.Turn…
%%100Attachment 1
I n s t i t u t i o n a l d a t a b a s eI n s t i t u t i o n a l d a t a b a s e ( (1 51 5))
S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r
S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r
S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r
S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r
S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r
I n t e r n e tI n t e r n e t ( (22))
c r i p c a sc r i p c a s e s s a y c o p se s s a y c o p s
To p s o u r c e sTo p s o u r c e s ( (33))
E x c l u d e d s o u r c e sE x c l u d e d s o u r c e s ( (00))
View Originality Report - Old Design
Word Count: 1,000 Wk6Assgn.TurnerA.NRNP6650.pptx
66 11 66
11 00
11 55
77 55 11 33
88 11 22
11 11
11 77
33 99
11 44
44
22 11
66 S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r 11 66
S t u d e n t p a p e rS t u d e n t p a p e r 22 c r i p c a sc r i p c a s
Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice: The effect of cognitive-behavioral group marital therapy on marital happiness
and problem-solving self-appraisal.
Adesola Turner NRNP 6650: Psychotherapy with Groups and Families
Sunday, October 11, 2020. 1
The type of group discussed
Cognitive behavioral group marital therapy (CBGMT). in order to bring a constructive positive outcomes in marital or matrimoni-
al satisfaction, the study assessed the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group therapy. 2
The group evaluated the effects of cognitive behavioral programs on the self-appraisal of partners on the abilities of problem solving.
The specific hypotheses of the article were that group martial therapy subjects would account changes in; Marital satisfaction
Overall appraisal on the abilities of problem solving Problem solving confidence
Approach to problem solving activities Strategies of controlling behaviors when couples try to solve 2
11 22
33
44
55
66 77
88
66
99
1 01 0
Participants of the group and why they were selected
The study’s sample comprised of 66 Canadian couples. The effectiveness of the CBGMT was measured by how these selected couples could adjust to their self-appraisal skills of solving a problem (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015). Authors selected partici- pants who at least have lived together for about 12.8 years. The age of selected couples ranged between 20-76 years. Ø1.2 was the mean age of the selected couple. The selected women and men's average education level was 14.5 years and 15.7 years, respectively.
3
The couples were randomly selected to either waiting or experimental list control group. Selection was done through publicity in several media. The couples that expressed interest were acquainted about the nature of the program, and then invited to the assess- ment interview. The selected couples completed both Marital Happiness Scale and Problem-Solving Inventory. They completed the
Problem-Solving Inventory and the Marital Happiness Scale.
3
Setting and duration of group therapy The setting of the group was University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM). The study took
place in the University of Quebec in Montreal. Four couples were placed in each group
Meeting was held once per week Meetings were conducted in 9 weeks period Each meeting lasted 3-4 hours 4
The behavioral and cognitive components of the problem-solving skills were taught in 6 hours (two sessions). During the two sessions, couples learned various problem-solving skills via modeling rehearsals, instructions, reading, feedback, dyadic practices, group discussions, cognitive restructuring, and homework assignment (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015). Each group was under the guidance of a licensed psychologist with a minimum of two-year experience in group intervention and marital therapy. Group
leaders received weekly supervisions between the sessions and 30 hours training. 4
Curative factors that are important for the group
Universality
Existential factors
Group cohesiveness
5
Universality. This factor is important in helping couples attending cognitive behavioral group marital therapy realize that the prob- lems they face in marriage is universal, that is, the problems are all over (Belanger, Sabourin & El-Baalbaki, 2012). Existential factors. These are important in helping couples attending cognitive behavioral group marital therapy to be aware that life must go on despite re- grets, sadness, and pain. Group cohesiveness. Provides members with a sense of security, value, belonging and acceptance. Impart- ing information. This factor is important in educating and empowering couples with knowledge regarding to particular psychological
situation
5
Exclusion criteria mentioned by the author
Selected couples with significant individual psychopathology. Couples with primary dysfunctions. Couples with drug or alcohol problems.
Couples without intense marital crisis. Couples under any form of therapy
6
Exclusion criteria are sets of pre-determined definitions for identifying subjects that will not be incorporated in the study. Cognitive behavioral group marital therapy is designed to help couples that have different predicaments. The above implies that individuals who are included in the study should have problems of various forms, and should never be involved in any therapy at the present. However, these
participants can be used in the control experiment. 6
Findings/outcomes of the article It was deduced that group couples who took part in the group marital therapy were able to effectively
engage and solve diverse matrimonial issues. 7
The hypothesis of the study was that the marital happiness of the couples increases significantly when they participate in the cogni- tive behavioral group marital therapy. Therefore, if the spouses follow the group interventions, they significantly increase their capac- ity of confronting different activities of solving problems. These activities include modeling rehearsals, instructions, reading, feedback, and dyadic practices (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015). This can translate into practice with my clients.
66
1 11 1 88
1 21 2 66
1 21 2 66 1 31 3 1 01 0
66 1 41 4
1 11 1
77 1 51 5
1 61 6 1 31 3
66
66 66
66 66
66
66
55 66
1 61 6
Group interventions are important in sharing different experiences, and it is these experiences that can provide my clients with a
foundation of dealing with personal problems. 7
1 61 6
S o u r c e M a t c h e sS o u r c e M a t c h e s ( (4 54 5))
essaycops 100%
cripcas 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 83%
Limitations of this study and whether thy impact the ability of using the findings presented Lack of follow-up after the conclusion of
the study. Nature of the measurements that were used in appraising the activities of problem-solving
8
Lack of follow-up after the conclusion of the study - The researchers never carried out a follow-up study after concluding their study (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015). This limitation will influence my ability of using the findings because of lack of verification. The above involves lack of uncertainty, that is, whether the self-appraised changes remained in action after the withdrawal of the therapy.
Nature of the measurements that were used in appraising the activities of problem-solving - The research concentrated on self-report regarding the efficacy of problem-solving, implying that interference associated changes, particularly for skills of problem-solving skills, are not warranted (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015). This limitation is bound to affect my ability of using the findings because
the effects of the therapy on the skills of problem-solving skills are discussed.
8
References Bélanger, C., Laporte, L., Sabourin, S., & Wright, J. (2015). The effect of cognitive-behavioral group marital therapy on marital happiness and problem solving self-appraisal. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 43(2), 103-118.
doi:10.1080/01926187.2014.956614.
9
66
66
1 61 6
1 71 7 22 66 11
1
Student paper
Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice:
Original source
Applying current literature to clinical practice
2
Student paper
The effect of cognitive-behavioral group marital therapy on marital happi- ness and problem-solving self-appraisal.
Original source
The effect of cognitive-behavioral group marital therapy on marital happi- ness and problem solving self-appraisal
3
Student paper
Psychotherapy with Groups and Families
Original source
Psychotherapy With Groups and Families
4
Student paper
Sunday, October 11, 2020.
Original source
October 11, 2020
Student paper 100%
Student paper 89%
Student paper 63%
Student paper 79%
Student paper 86%
Student paper 72%
5
Student paper
The type of group discussed
Original source
TYPE OF GROUP DISCUSSED
6
Student paper
Cognitive behavioral group marital therapy (CBGMT).
Original source
Cognitive behavioral group marital therapy
7
Student paper
in order to bring a constructive positive outcomes in marital or matrimoni- al satisfaction, the study assessed the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group therapy.
Original source
Evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral group marital therapy to create positive changes in marital satisfaction
8
Student paper
The group evaluated the effects of cognitive behavioral programs on the self-appraisal of partners on the abilities of problem solving.
Original source
To study the effects of cognitive -behavioral group marital therapy on part- ners self-appraisal of problem solving abilities
6
Student paper
The specific hypotheses of the article were that group martial therapy sub- jects would account changes in;
Original source
The particular hypotheses of the article were that group martial therapy subjects would account changes include
9
Student paper
Overall appraisal on the abilities of problem solving Problem solving confidence
Original source
Overall appraisal of their problem-solving abilities
Student paper 66%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 62%
Student paper 64%
Student paper 75%
Student paper 85%
10
Student paper
Approach to problem solving activities Strategies of controlling behaviors when couples try to solve 2
Original source
Approach to problem solving activities strategies to control their behavior when they try to solve problems
6
Student paper
Participants of the group and why they were selected
Original source
Participants of the group and why they were selected
11
Student paper
The effectiveness of the CBGMT was measured by how these selected cou- ples could adjust to their self-appraisal skills of solving a problem (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015).
Original source
appraisal of their problem-solving efficacy(Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin, & Wright, 2015)
8
Student paper
Authors selected participants who at least have lived together for about 12.8 years.
Original source
All participants were married couples who have lived together for an aver- age of 12.8 years
12
Student paper
The age of selected couples ranged between 20-76 years.
Original source
It was a requirement that the selected couples be between the age of 20 and 76 years
6
Student paper
Ø1.2 was the mean age of the selected couple. The selected women and men's average education level was 14.5 years and 15.7 years, respectively.
Original source
Student paper 94%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 74%
Student paper 89%
Student paper 77%
Student paper 70%
Mean age of the selected couple was 1.2 The average level of education for the selected people was 14.5 years and 15.7 years for women and men respectively
12
Student paper
The couples were randomly selected to either waiting or experimental list control group.
Original source
Couples were selected randomly to a waiting or experimental list control group
6
Student paper
Selection was done through publicity in several media.
Original source
The selection was done through publicity in several media
13
Student paper
The couples that expressed interest were acquainted about the nature of the program, and then invited to the assessment interview.
Original source
Couples who expressed interest were briefly informed of the nature of the program and invited to an assessment interview
10
Student paper
The selected couples completed both Marital Happiness Scale and Prob- lem-Solving Inventory. They completed the Problem-Solving Inventory and the Marital Happiness Scale.
Original source
The couples completed the Problem Solving Inventory and Marital Happi- ness Scale The couples completed the Problem Solving Inventory and Mari- tal Happiness Scale
6
Student paper
Setting and duration of group therapy The setting of the group was Univer- sity of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM).
Original source
The setting of the group was the University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM)
14
Student paper
Student paper 69%
Student paper 97%
Student paper 80%
Student paper 89%
Student paper 85%
Student paper
The study took place in the University of Quebec in Montreal.
Original source
University of Quebec in Montreal
11
Student paper
Four couples were placed in each group
Original source
Each group comprised four couples
7
Student paper
The behavioral and cognitive components of the problem-solving skills were taught in 6 hours (two sessions).
Original source
The cognitive and behavioral components of problem-solving skills were taught for two sessions (6 hours)
15
Student paper
During the two sessions, couples learned various problem-solving skills via modeling rehearsals, instructions, reading, feedback, dyadic practices, group discussions, cognitive restructuring, and homework assignment (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015).
Original source
Couples learned different problem-solving stages through reading, instruc- tions, modeling rehearsal, dyadic practices, feedback, cognitive restructur- ing, group discussions, and homework assignments (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin, & Wright, 2015)
16
Student paper
Each group was under the guidance of a licensed psychologist with a mini- mum of two-year experience in group intervention and marital therapy.
Original source
Each group was led by a licensed psychologist with a minimum of two-year experience in marital therapy and group intervention
13
Student paper
Group leaders received weekly supervisions between the sessions and 30 hours training.
Original source
All group leaders received 30 hours of training and weekly supervision be- tween sessions
Student paper 100%
Student paper 98%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 80%
6
Student paper
Curative factors that are important for the group
Original source
Curative factors that are important for the group
6
Student paper
This factor is important in helping couples attending cognitive behavioral group marital therapy realize that the problems they face in marriage is universal, that is, the problems are all over (Belanger, Sabourin & El-Baal- baki, 2012).
Original source
This factor is important in helping couples attending cognitive behavioral group marital therapy realize that the problems they face in marriage are universal, that is, the problems are all over (Belanger, Sabourin & El-Baal- baki, 2012)
6
Student paper
These are important in helping couples attending cognitive behavioral group marital therapy to be aware that life must go on despite regrets, sadness, and pain.
Original source
These are important in helping couples attending cognitive behavioral group marital therapy to be aware that life must go on despite regrets, sadness, and pain
6
Student paper
Provides members with a sense of security, value, belonging and acceptance.
Original source
Provides members with a sense of security, value, belonging and acceptance
6
Student paper
This factor is important in educating and empowering couples with knowl- edge regarding to particular psychological situation
Original source
This factor is important in educating and empowering couples with knowl- edge regarding the particular psychological situation (Belanger, Sabourin & El-Baalbaki, 2012)
Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 92%
Student paper 71%
Student paper 100%
6
Student paper
Exclusion criteria mentioned by the author Selected couples with signifi- cant individual psychopathology. Couples with primary dysfunctions. Cou- ples with drug or alcohol problems.
Original source
Exclusion criteria mentioned by the author Selected couples with signifi- cant individual psychopathology Couples with primary dysfunctions Cou- ples with drug or alcohol problems
6
Student paper
Couples without intense marital crisis.
Original source
Couples without intense marital crisis
6
Student paper
Exclusion criteria are sets of pre-determined definitions for identifying sub- jects that will not be incorporated in the study. Cognitive behavioral group marital therapy is designed to help couples that have different predica- ments. The above implies that individuals who are included in the study should have problems of various forms, and should never be involved in any therapy at the present. However, these participants can be used in the control experiment.
Original source
Exclusion criteria are sets of pre-determined definitions for identifying sub- jects that will not be incorporated in the study Cognitive behavioral group marital therapy is designed to help couples that have different predica- ments The above implies that individuals who are included in the study should have problems of various forms, and should never be involved in any therapy at the present However, these participants can be used in the control experiment (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015)
5
Student paper
The hypothesis of the study was that the marital happiness of the couples increases significantly when they participate in the cognitive behavioral group marital therapy.
Original source
The findings of this study generally support the hypothesis that couples’ marital happiness increases significantly following participation in cogni- tive-behavioral group marital therapy
6
Student paper
Therefore, if the spouses follow the group interventions, they significantly increase their capacity of confronting different activities of solving prob- lems. These activities include modeling rehearsals, instructions, reading, feedback, and dyadic practices (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015).
Student paper 100%
Student paper 84%
Student paper 92%
Student paper 94%
2015).
Original source
Therefore, if the spouses follow the group interventions, they significantly increase their capacity of confronting different activities of solving prob- lems These activities include modeling rehearsals, instructions, reading, feedback, and dyadic practices (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015)
16
Student paper
This can translate into practice with my clients. Group interventions are im- portant in sharing different experiences, and it is these experiences that can provide my clients with a foundation of dealing with personal problems.
Original source
This can translate into practice with my clients Group interventions are im- portant in sharing different experiences, and it is these experiences that can provide my clients with a foundation of dealing with personal problems
6
Student paper
Limitations of this study and whether thy impact the ability of using the findings presented Lack of follow-up after the conclusion of the study. Na- ture of the measurements that were used in appraising the activities of problem-solving
Original source
Limitations of this study and whether thy impact the ability to use the find- ings presented in the article Nature of the measurements that were used in appraising the activities of problem-solving
6
Student paper
Lack of follow-up after the conclusion of the study - The researchers never carried out a follow-up study after concluding their study (Bélanger, La- porte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015). This limitation will influence my ability of using the findings because of lack of verification. The above involves lack of uncertainty, that is, whether the self-appraised changes remained in ac- tion after the withdrawal of the therapy.
Original source
There was follow-up following the study The researchers never carried out a follow-up study after concluding their study (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015) This limitation will influence my ability to use the findings because of lack of verification The above involves a lack of uncertainty, that is, whether the self-appraised changes remained in action after the with- drawal of the therapy
16
Student paper
Nature of the measurements that were used in appraising the activities of problem-solving - The research concentrated on self-report regarding the efficacy of problem-solving, implying that interference associated changes, particularly for skills of problem-solving skills, are not warranted (Bélanger,
Student paper 100%
cripcas 100%
Student paper 100%
essaycops 100%
particularly for skills of problem-solving skills, are not warranted (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015). This limitation is bound to affect my ability of using the findings because the effects of the therapy on the skills of problem-solving skills are discussed.
Original source
The research concentrated on self-report regarding the efficacy of prob- lem-solving, implying that interference associated changes, particularly for skills of problem-solving skills, are not warranted (Bélanger, Laporte, Sabourin & Wright, 2015) This limitation is bound to affect my ability of us- ing the findings because the effects of the therapy on the skills of problem- solving skills are discussed
17
Student paper
References Bélanger, C., Laporte, L., Sabourin, S., & Wright, J.
Original source
References Bélanger, C., Laporte, L., Sabourin, S., & Wright, J
2
Student paper
The effect of cognitive-behavioral group marital therapy on marital happi- ness and problem solving self-appraisal.
Original source
The effect of cognitive-behavioral group marital therapy on marital happi- ness and problem solving self-appraisal
6
Student paper
The American Journal of Family Therapy, 43(2), 103-118.
Original source
American Journal of Family Therapy, 43(2), 103–118
1
Student paper
doi:10.1080/01926187.2014.956614.
Original source
doi:10.1080/01926187.2014.956614
