team and leadership quiz

profiledoudou
OrganizationalBehavior_Session12-IntroducingTeamSupportAssessment_Spring2021v1.pptx

- Organizational Behavior - Assessing structure, culture, leadership and team dynamics to improve organizational effectiveness

Session 12 – Introducing Team Support

Spring 2021

Version 1

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Agenda:

Discuss course calendar and the next two weeks of assignments

Review HW Assignments and Quiz

Discuss Challenges of Team Development and Support

break

Discuss theories of Human Resource Development

Discuss core concepts in identifying resources and building teams

Introduce Challenges in Maintaining Team Cohesion without Suppressing Divergent Points of View

Session - Introducing Team Support

Objectives:

Discuss the course calendar and expectations for next two weeks

Discuss the challenges of developing and supporting teams

Integrate supplemental readings to discuss challenges of virtual teams

Reintroduce personality as a way of developing a deeper understanding of team selection, development and support

6:00 - 6:15 pm

6:15 – 6:45 pm

6:45 - 7:15 pm

Tomorrow:

Deeper dive on prep for HW presentations, explore more fully how we apply the methodology to the companies we are studying

Next week

Quiz 2 Opens

Two Weeks

Final HW 4 Presentations

Peer Assessment

2

7:30 - 8:30 pm

7:15 - 7:30 pm

Today

Tomorrow

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

introduction

course calendar

organizational behavior

structural assessment

symbolic (cultural) assessment

political (leadership) assessment

resource (team) assessment

3

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Overview of Sessions and Assignments

This is an organizational assessment ‘consulting methodology’, to help you better ‘see’, design and manage teams and organizations

Each session builds on the other to lead to a comprehensive executive presentation presenting findings, conclusions and recommendations

We are learning a methodology for understanding, defining, improving, innovating and managing teams and organizations

Group presentations will be limited to 15 minutes

4

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Organizational Behavior - Course Structure

The Advantage; Building a Cohesive Leadership Team

The Advantage;

Create Clarity

Stewardship: Choosing Service over Self-Interest

The Icarus Deception

Reframing Organizations: The Structural Frame

Reframing Organizations: The Human Resource (Team) Frame

Reframing Organizations: The Symbolic (Culture) Frame

Reframing Organizations: The Political (Leadership) Frame

The Purpose of Organizations - Service

The Purpose of Organizations - Creativity

Organizational Focus and Purpose

Assess the Purpose

Course Structure - Methodology

Assess the Formal Structure

Assess the Leadership

Build the Team

Philosophically we approach the discipline like a consultant. How do we describe an organization in a way that we can understand enablers and disablers of performance? How do we develop a point of view on what works and what can be improved?

Philosophically - the HW Assignments assume that you are not necessarily trying to change a large organization but to help the team you are managing to be better performers - better at fulfilling their purpose

HBS on Teams: Building Your Team’s Infrastructure

HBS on Teams: Building Close out Your Team

HBS on Teams: Building Manage Team Process

HBS on Teams: Building Manage Team Conflict

Organizational Assessment and Development

Teamwork Assessment and Development

Philosophically - the discussion forums help us to understand the focus and purpose of organizations

The Knowledge Creating Organization

The Focus of Organizations - Knowledge Creation

The Advantage- Organization Health

The Focus of Organizations - Health and Alignment

Assessing Structure

Assessing Capability

team-based

individual-based

Individual Self-Awareness and Personal Mastery

Please Understand Me II

Foundational Element to Better Understand and Assess Organizational Effectiveness

Philosophically - this book helps us to understand how to develop better self awareness and leverage it for better ‘other awareness’ to develop more proactive strategies for developing leaders and managing teams

Advanced applications to leadership, team development and management

5

The Advantage;

Over-Communicate Clarity

The Advantage; Reinforce Clarity

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

X

X

X

X

Strategy

Structure Alignment

Structure

Culture Alignment

Culture

Leadership

Alignment

Leadership

Team

Alignment

Organizational

Behavior

Alignment Drives Effectiveness

Re-alignment ensures sustainable success

Structure

Leadership

Team

Culture

Effective Organizations are Aligned with the Needs of their Environment

and create and manage tension

Overview of course

Organizations as interconnected teams which operate most effectively when there is close alignment between strategy, structure, culture, and leadership

Ongoing and evolving External and Internal (P.E.S.T. and S.W.O.T.) changes require continual adjustment and realignment

Organizational Behavior Alignment Model

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

How are we designed

How do we act

Create tension

Manage tension

‘Sisyphus’

6

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Establish your team

Manage your Team

Integrate new Team Members and Manage Conflict

Deliver Results and Reflect on Opportunities to Improve

Read:

Section 1: Build your Team’s Infrastructure: Ch.'s 1-7

Deliverables

Team Assessment

Team Charter

Do we understand our strengths, blind spots and potential points of conflict?

Have we established clear objectives and understand our roles and responsibilities?

Have we established a strong process to manage the work, stay on track and identify and resolve issues?

Do we understand how to reconcile differences about goals and process?

Have we established strong processes that facilitates the onboarding of new team members

Do we understand how to identify and collaboratively resolve risks?

Do we understand how to work with our key stakeholders to ensure we deliver what they want when they want it?

Have we debriefed and assessed what went well and where there are opportunities for improvement?

Read:

Section 2: Manage your Team Ch.'s 8-10

Deliverables

Team Process Assessment - 1/3

Read:

Section 2: Manage your Team: Ch.'s 11-13

Deliverables

Team Process Assessment - 2/3

Read:

Section 3: Close out Your Team: Ch.’s 14-15

Deliverables

Team Post-close Assessment

Do we have a strong team and process for managing team accountabilities?

Do we understand how to anticipate and manage conflict to ensure we can complete our objectives on-time?

Change

team

Building and managing effective teams is the heart of organizational effectiveness

Team Development and Management Assessment Framework

Are we able to effectively on-board new team members

refer

We will use our group assignments to learn how to develop a strong, resilient team

7

7

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

We are changing team assignments for HW 3 and 4

We want to understand how to onboard and integrate new team members

next peer assessments based on new groupings

8

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Team Homework

Assignment 4

Organizational Resource (team) Assessment and

Reflection on Team Close Out

organizational behavior

structural assessment

symbolic (cultural) assessment

political (leadership) assessment

resource (team) assessment

9

9

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Organizational Assessment and Development

Teamwork Assessment and Development

Organizational Team Support Assessment

The Advantage;

Reinforce Clarity

Reframing Organizations: The Human Resource (Team) Frame

HBS on Teams: Building Close out Your Team

Slide 1 - Re-establish Context

Establish context

Company, industry, age, size

Slide 2 – Culture Capability and Conflict Management

Describe how teams progress to high performance

Discuss Chris Argyris’ model of Advocacy and Inquiry

Discuss how this model combined with and understanding of Keirsey temperament types can be used to anticipate and manage conflict

Slide 3 - Assessment

Research the company you have selected and identify their approach to team development and management

Slide 4 - Recommendation

Develop a point of view on their approach to team development and management

Assess strengths and weaknesses

Identify opportunities for improvement

Slide 8

Slide 5

Slide 7

Team Process Application and Reflection

Reflections on Readings

Complete a process assessment

Slide 9

Reflections on Experience

(use the Keep/Start/Stop method)

Revise the team charter

Refer next slide

Presentation expectations - everyone presents - approximately 1-2 minutes per slide - 10-15 min/team

10

Slide 6

Complete a Team Culture and Capability Assessment

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Staying focused, delivering what was promised, managing differences to stay on track

How do we use our understanding of team differences to develop and strengthen cohesion without suppressing difference that could lead to useful insights

How do we continue use our understanding of team differences to anticipate and resolve conflicts?

11

What did we learn after you finished?

The Keep/Start/Stop Method (here)

What do we want to keep doing?

What do we want to start doing?

What do we want to stop doing?

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Complete a team process assessment

Revise the team charter

12

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Do we (I) have a strong core culture?

A strong understanding of what is important,

A strong sense of self (personal awareness) to know how to adapt to what is important

(this enables us to adapt, tells us what is important to see)

Do we (I) have the right Capability Alignment?

(this tells us what to adapt to, tells us what skills to develop)

13

13

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

NF

NT

SJ

SP

People

Purpose

Process

Product

culture:

tacit rules on what is seen and how what is seen is acted on as it is applied to focus, execution and development

Purpose

People

Process

Product

no focus/

planning paralysis

shared vision/

clear strategy and road map

no decisions/

consensus paralysis

co-creation/

strong engagement

no cooperation/

sub-process compliance

process rigor /

consistency and quality of output

no outcomes/ learning/fire fighting/

everything is crisis mgmt.

product/outcome rigor/

strong design

NT

NF

SJ

SP

The four dimensions of culture

Culture Assessment

Weak culture

Strong Culture

Culture is Built and Maintained Collectively – through balance and mastery

Each person has a unique temperament – that can contribute to the whole or detract – do we have organizational balance – do we have organizational mastery

What is the gap?

The gap is closed collectively by leveraging individual preferences and strengths

where should we focus attention and expectations – build shared mindset on what’s important – use industry phase to refine focus – ensure balance

14

14

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Do we (I) have strong core culture?

(this enables us to adapt, tells us what is important to see)

Do we (I) have the right Capability Alignment?

(this tells us what to adapt to, tells us what skills to develop)

15

15

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

NF

NT

SJ

SP

People

Purpose

Process

Product

The four dimensions of capability

Capability Assessment

capabilities:

explicit technical requirements required to

perform assigned work tasks

where should we focus training and development and support – build strengths – use industry phase to refine focus – ensure balance

strengths when env stable

weaknesses when env ambiguous

purpose

people

process

product

today oriented/tactical

task management

future oriented/strategic

business model/mind alignment

arms-length/

invest in contract/

specific job

co-creation/

invest in relationship/

connections

unit focus/

focus on dept tech/support/

knowledge - fluency

company focus/

focus on enterprise systems/support/

knowledge - fluency

specific task oriented/

high switching costs/

deep company specific know.

general function (eg mkt) oriented/

low switching cost/

deep ind. functional specific know.

assessment

continuum

weaknesses when env stable

strengths when env ambiguous

NT

NF

SJ

SP

the degree of change is low

the degree of change is high

16

16

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Quiz 2

Reflection on Leadership and Team Management

organizational behavior

structural assessment

symbolic (cultural) assessment

political (leadership) assessment

resource (team) assessment

17

17

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Areas of Coverage:

Introduction – based on Chapters 1-6:

What is your temperament?

What are the temperaments other people (at least one other person) who is/are important to you?

How could this knowledge (yours vs, theirs) help to drive consensus and mitigate conflict?

Team building – building a team– based on Chapter 7

How does an understanding of how strong relationships are built help you to identify strong fit and potentially conflicting personalities? How does it apply to building and managing a team.

Who are you most likely to connect with? Who are you most likely to have conflict with?

How does this knowledge help you to anticipate conflict? How does it help you to anticipate blind spots? With this knowledge what can you do to preemptively mitigate the risk?

Team development – developing a team– based on Chapter 8

How does an understanding how parents can best support the development of their children help you understand how to develop your team?

What is your learning style and how do you like to grow and develop? How do other learning styles differ from your own?

How could this knowledge help you to develop more effective change management programs?

What are some of the challenges in developing team and organizational capability when there are different learning styles?

Leadership and Intelligence – developing leadership capability– based on Chapter 9

How does an understanding of different leadership styles and intelligence traits lead to a better understanding of you identify develop and support leaders of change initiatives?

How would you develop and support a leader that looks like you? What kind of leadership roles would you put them in?

How would you develop and support a leader that looks different from you? What kind of leadership roles would you put them in?

Summary

What are your initial thoughts on who needs to be on your team, who your leaders will be and what is the organization or individual you would like to help change?

How would your knowledge of the subject areas covered in this book help you to be successful at helping them to understand the need to change then helping them to stay on the change journey?

Process:

read assigned chapters

address questions

be prepared to present answers in class

there is no need to prepare a report

there is no requirement to submit to NYU classes

Please Understand Me II – Temperament, Character and Intelligence

To understand organizations, we need to understand ourselves - organizations have personalities - studying our own personality is the best way to understand an organizations’ personality

Session 2

Session 8

Session 11

18

18

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

18

19

Session 12

Team building – building a team– based on Chapter 7 Mating

How does an understanding of how strong relationships are built help you to identify strong fit and potentially conflicting personalities? How does it apply to building and managing a team.

Who are you most likely to connect with? Who are you most likely to have conflict with?

How does this knowledge help you to anticipate conflict? How does it help you to anticipate blind spots? With this knowledge what can you do to preemptively mitigate the risk?

Team development – developing a team– based on Chapter 8 Parenting

How does an understanding how parents can best support the development of their children help you understand how to develop your team?

What is your learning style and how do you like to grow and develop? How do other learning styles differ from your own?

How could this knowledge help you to develop more effective change management programs?

What are some of the challenges in developing team and organizational capability when there are different learning styles?

It is not our purpose to become each other; it is to recognize the other, to learn to see the other and honor him for what he is.

—Hermann Hesse

And yet another factor involved in our choice of mate, at least as powerful if not more, is temperament. — we will select our mate according to temperament.

romantic attractions are not random and indiscriminate but show clear patterns and frequencies.

how does this relate to team building and team effectiveness

who are the team members most likely to get along and why

who are the team members most likely to have conflicts and why

SJ-SP

NT-NF

Let us beware and beware and beware...of having an ideal for our children. So doing, we damn them.

—D.H. Lawrence

How do we tend to want to develop and support team members? The way we would want to? Why is this potentially very bad?

The truth is that kids of different temperament will develop in entirely different directions, no matter what the parents do to discourage one direction in favor of another.

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Quiz 2 - Reflection of Leadership and Team Management

Open book

Take - home

Timed 1 1/5 hours

Three short answers - 4-5 paragraphs each (1½ pages)

Reflections on Keirsey and McKinsey

Questions:

33 pts.

33 pts.

34 pts.

20

Team building – building a team– based on Chapter 7

How does an understanding of how strong relationships are built help you to identify strong fit and potentially conflicting personalities? How does it apply to building and managing a team.

Who are you most likely to connect with? Who are you most likely to have conflict with?

How does this knowledge help you to anticipate conflict? How does it help you to anticipate blind spots? With this knowledge what can you do to preemptively mitigate the risk?

Team development – developing a team– based on Chapter 8

How does an understanding how parents can best support the development of their children help you understand how to develop your team?

What is your learning style and how do you like to grow and develop? How do other learning styles differ from your own?

How could this knowledge help you to develop more effective change management programs?

What are some of the challenges in developing team and organizational capability when there are different learning styles?

Leadership and Intelligence – developing leadership capability– based on Chapter 9

How does an understanding of different leadership styles and intelligence traits lead to a better understanding of you identify develop and support leaders of change initiatives?

How would you develop and support a leader that looks like you? What kind of leadership roles would you put them in?

How would you develop and support a leader that looks different from you? What kind of leadership roles would you put them in?

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

21

The Challenge of Team Development and Support

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Readings:

How do we build strong teams

How does being virtual impact team development

How do we proactively anticipate and manage team conflict

Teams are the heart of organizations. They must be developed and supported to be successful

22

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

23

How do we build strong teams

INCREASINGLY, WORK IS TEAMWORK. But the structures, cultures, and practices in many companies make collaboration within and across teams difficult. The various drivers of collaborative dysfunction reveal the shortcomings of standard solutions such as formal redesigns (think “spans” and “layers”), collaborative tool deployments, and the current craze for Agile methodologies that often underperform because they assume a one-size-fits-all solution. By understanding how the six dysfunctions described above play out and identifying which ones exist at your company, you’ll be on your way to creating a truly collaborative workplace.

DYSFUNCTION #1: Hub-and-Spoke Networks

DYSFUNCTION #2: Disenfranchised Nodes

DYSFUNCTION #3: Misaligned Nodes

DYSFUNCTION #4: Overwhelmed Nodes

DYSFUNCTION #5: Isolated Networks

DYSFUNCTION #6: Priority Overload

How do we proactively anticipate and manage team conflict

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

24

How does being virtual impact team development

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

25

Theories on Human Resource Development

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Chapter 6 People and Organizations

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

People and Organizations

Human Resource Assumptions

Human Needs

Work and Motivation

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Theory X and Theory Y

Personality and Organization

Human Capacity and the Changing Employment Contract

27

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Human Resource Assumptions

Organizations exist to serve human needs

People and organizations need each other

When the fit between individual and system is poor, one or both suffer

A good fit benefits both

28

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Human Needs

Concept of “need” controversial

Economists: people’s willingness to trade dissimilar items disproves concept

Psychologists: need, or motive is useful way to talk about enduring preferences for some experiences

Needs a product of both nature and nurture

Genes determine initial trajectory

Experience and learning profoundly influence preferences

29

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Maslow’s Need Hierarchy

Needs arrayed in hierarchy

Lower needs are “pre-potent”

Higher needs more important after lower are satisfied

Maslow’s hierarchy

Self-actualization

Esteem

Belongingness, love

Safety

Physiological

30

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y

Theory X

Worker's passive and lazy, prefer to be led, resist change

Theory Y

Management’s task to ensure workers meet their important needs while they work

Either theory can be self-fulfilling prophesy

31

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Argyris Personality and Organization

Traditional management principles produce conflict between people and organizations

Task specialization: narrow, boring jobs requiring few skills

Directive leadership: makes workers dependent, treats them like children

Ways workers adapt to frustration

Withdraw

Become passive, apathetic

Resist—deception, featherbedding, or sabotage

Climb the hierarchy

Form groups (labor unions)

Teach children that work is unrewarding

32

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Human Capacity and the Changing Employment Contract

Global trends pushing organizations in two different directions

Lean and mean: downsize, outsource, hire temps and contractors

Win with talent: build competent, well-trained workforce

Shift from production economy to information economy produces skill gaps

33

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Conclusion

Organizations need people and people need organizations; the trick is to align their needs

Key dilemma: lean and mean versus invest in people?

34

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

35

Identifying Resources and Building Teams

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Chapter 7 Improving Human Resource Management

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Google Get Better People and Treat Them Better = Better Performance

On-site perks include free on-site parking, health clinics, haircuts, fitness classes, oil change and bike repair, valet parking, free laundry services, and gourmet meals

“The company culture truly makes workers feel they’re valued and respected as a human being, not as a cog in a machine.” (Google employee)

37

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Strategies for Improving Human Resource Management

Develop and Implement a Human Resource Philosophy

Hire the Right People

Keep Employees

Invest in Employees

Empower Employees

Promote Diversity

38

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Improving Human Resource Management (II)

Getting There: Training and Organization

Survey Feedback

Evolution of OD

39

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Hire the Right People

Know what you want, be selective

Hire people who bring the right skills and attitudes

Hire those who fit the mold

40

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Reward well and protect jobs

Promote from within

Powerful performance incentive

Increases trust and loyalty

Capitalizes on knowledge and skills

Reduces errors

Increases the likelihood to think longer-term

Share the wealth: Give workers a stake in organization’s success

Keep Employees

41

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Invest in Employees

Invest in learning

Create opportunities for development

42

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Provide Information and Support

Make performance data available and teach workers how to use them

Encourage workers to think like owners

Everyone gets a piece of the action

Foster Autonomy and Participation

Redesign Work

Build Self-Managing Teams

Promote Egalitarianism

Empower Employees

43

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Promote Diversity

Develop explicit, consistent diversity philosophy, strategy

Hold managers accountable

44

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Getting There Training and Organization Development

Barriers to better human resource management

Management reluctance

Disrupts established patterns, relationships

Lack of communication and interpersonal skills

Training and OD to build capacity

Disrupts established patterns, relationships

Lack of communication and interpersonal skills

45

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Conclusion

High-involvement management strategies:

Strengthen employee-organization bond

Pay well, share the benefits

Job security

Promote from within

Training and development

Empower and improve quality of work-life

Participation, democracy, egalitarianism

Job enrichment, teaming

Promote diversity

46

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

47

Building Capability to Hire the Right People and Develop a Team -

The Advantage: Reinforce Clarity

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity

Objectives:

Define Reinforcing Clarity.

Impact on Recruiting and Hiring.

Impact on Interviewing.

Impact on New Employee Orientation.

Impact on Performance Management.

Impact on Compensation and Rewards.

Impact on Recognition.

Impact on Firing.

Terms:

Human Systems in Organizations

Live for Fit

Real-Time Recognition

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity

What is Reinforcing Clarity?

The answers to the Six Critical Questions for clarity should become embedded in the fabric of the organization.

Therefore, every human system in the organization, every process that involves people should reinforce the answers to these questions.

  

Impact on Recruiting and Hiring

There should be an effort to “live for fit,” as opposed to technical interviewing.

The best approach for hiring is to have just enough structure to ensure consistency and adherence to core values.

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity

Impact on Interviewing

Interviewing must be simple and flexible. There must be some involvement from the leadership team for guidance.

Impact on New Employee Orientation

New employee orientation needs to reinforce the answers to the Six Questions. It is a short window of time and should not be wasted.

Impact on Performance Management

Clarity as to what is expected as well as feedback is necessary. Coaching must be emphasized in order to build trust. Again, clear direction is important, and conversation must be stimulated.

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity

Impact on Compensation and Rewards

Compensation and rewards give staff an incentive to do what is best for the organization.

Compensation and rewards must be consistent with the answers of the Six Questions – simple and understandable.

Impact on Recognition

Recognition must be real-time. Recognition is a behavior driver. Don’t throw money at the problem; use gratitude and appreciation.

Impact on Firing

Firing is a decision driven by an organization’s values.

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Checklist for Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity

The organization has a simple way to ensure that new hires are carefully selected based on company’s values.

New people are brought into the organization by thoroughly teaching them about the six elements of clarity.

Managers throughout the organization have a simple, consistent, and non-bureaucratic system for setting goals and reviewing progress with employees. That system is customized around the elements of clarity.

Employees who don’t fit the values are managed out of the organization. Poor performers who do fit the values are given the coaching and assistance they need to succeed.

Compensation and reward systems are built around the values and goals of the organization.

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Book reports

Organizational Focus on Services and Creativity

organizational behavior

structural assessment

symbolic (cultural) assessment

political (leadership) assessment

resource (team) assessment

53

53

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Access the book: ‘Stewardship Choosing Service over Self-Interest’ at the NYU Library (here)

Read Part A

Answer the questions (2-3 pages) and upload to NYU Classes

Book reports

Upload before Session 10

Access the book: ‘Icarus Deception’ on NYU Classes (instructor upload)

Read the full book

Answer the questions: (2-3 pages) and upload to NYU Classes

Upload before Session 12

What does it mean to to replace leadership with stewardship?

What does it mean to choose partnership over patriarchy?

What does it mean to choose adventure over safety?

What does it mean to choose service over self-interest?

How could you embrace this in your organization?

What does the statement, ‘You are not your career’, mean?

What is the Icarus Deception and what does it mean for you?

Why make art? Why is art frightening?

What is the connection economy? How do you reconcile this to a traditional organization? How will you reconcile the paradox?

54

How do we reconcile the needs to have clarity and alignment with the need to foster creativity, independence and conflict

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

55

What does the statement, ‘You are not your career’, mean?

your ability to follow instructions is not the secret to your success

how do you bring your best to work

how do you encourage other to

why is this hard? good?

What is the Icarus Deception and what does it mean for you?

how do you disobey without being disobedient?

Why make art? Why is art frightening?

Art is the new safety zone?

Change requires us to be artists/

Why is that hard? Good?

What is the connection economy? How do you reconcile this to a traditional organization? How will you reconcile the paradox?

How do you create connections?

How do cross-connections exist in hierarchical structures?

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

56

Challenges in Maintaining Team Cohesion without Suppressing Divergent Points of View

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Chapter 8 Interpersonal and Group Dynamics

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Interpersonal and Group Dynamics

Interpersonal Dynamics

Emotional Intelligence

Management Styles

Groups and Teams in Organizations

58

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Interpersonal Dynamics

Managers spend much of their time in relationships

Three recurrent questions regularly haunt managers

What is really happening in this relationship?

Why do other people behave as they do?

What can I do about it?

59

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Interpersonal Dynamics (II)

Argyris and Schön’s theories for action:

Espoused theory: How individuals describe, explain, or predict their own behavior

Theory-in-use: The program that governs an individual’s actions

Model I: Theory in use

Model I: Assumptions

Model II: Assumptions

The Perils of Self-Protection

60

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Model I: Theory in use

61

Core Values (Governing Variables) Action Strategies Consequences for Relationships Consequences for Learning
Define and achieve your own goals Design and manage unilaterally You’re seen as defensive, inconsistent, selfish Self-sealing
Maximize winning, minimize losing Own and control what’s relevant to you You generate defensiveness Single-loop learning
Avoid negative feelings Protect yourself You reinforce mistrust, conformity, avoiding risk Private testing of assumptions
Be rational Unilaterally protect others Key issues become undiscussable Unconscious collusion to avoid learning

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Model I Assumptions

Problems caused by the other person

Since they caused the problem, get them to change

Refusal or defensiveness proves they caused problem

If they resist, intensify pressure, protect them (to avoid discomfort), or reject them

If you don’t succeed, it’s their fault; you’re not responsible

62

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Model II Assumptions

Focus on common goals, mutual influence

Communicate openly, test beliefs publicly

Combine advocacy with inquiry

63

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Advocacy and Inquiry

Assertive Integrative
Passive Accommodating

High

High

Low

Low

Inquiry

Advocacy

64

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Emotional Intelligence

Emotional Intelligence: awareness of self and others, ability to deal with emotions and relationships (Salovey and Mayer)

Management bestseller: Daniel Goleman’s Emotional Intelligence

EI more important than IQ to managerial success

Individuals with low EI and high IQ are dangerous in the workplace

65

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Management Styles

Lewin, Lippitt, and White: autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire leadership

Myers-Briggs Inventory

Introversion versus extraversion

Sensing versus intuition

Thinking versus feeling

Judging versus perceiving

66

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Management Styles (II)

“Big 5 Model”

Extraversion—enjoying others and seeking them out

Agreeableness—getting along with others

Conscientiousness—orderly, planful, hard working

Neuroticism—difficulty controlling negative feelings

Openness to experience—preference for novelty and creativity

67

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Groups and Teams in Organizations

Informal Roles

Informal Group Norms

Interpersonal Conflict in Groups

Leadership and Decision Making in Groups

68

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Informal Roles

Informal role: unwritten, often unspoken expectation about how an individual will behave in the group

Individuals prefer different roles: some prefer to be active and in control, others prefer to stay in the background

Individuals who can’t find a comfortable role may withdraw or become troublemakers

Individuals may compete over the same role (e.g., two people who want to run things), hindering group effectiveness

69

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Informal Group Norms

Informal norm: unwritten rule about what individuals have to do to be members in good standing

Norms need to align with task and preferences of group members

Norms often develop unconsciously; groups do better to discuss how they want to operate

70

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Handling Interpersonal Conflict in Groups

Develop skills

Agree on basics

Search for interests in common

Experiment

Doubt your infallibility

Treat conflict as a group responsibility

71

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Leadership and Decision Making in Groups

The question: How we will steer the group?

Leadership is essential, but may be shared and fluid

Leaders who over control or understructure produce frustration, ineffectiveness

72

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Conclusion

Employees bring social and personal needs to the workplace

Individuals’ social skills or competencies are a critical element

Though often frustrating, groups can be both satisfying and efficient

73

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

74

Anticipating and Managing Conflict

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Eliyahu Goldratt

75

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Can we anticipate storming and provide the right kind of support to change the dynamic?

Developing/ Planning Strategy

Executing

Plan

Reviewing Output

Integrating Output

NT

NF

SJ

SP

Collectively 80% of the world

Realists (pessimists)

Tell-oriented

Conflict drivers

Collectively 20% of the world

Futurists (optimists)

Ask-oriented

Consensus drivers

Always pushing for an implementation (from two exact opposite perspectives) and always wanting to skip insight and planning

Always pushing for an insight and planning (from two exact opposite perspectives) and less interested in the details of implementation and output

Understanding and using the ‘Conflict Anticipation Matrix’©

anticipating ‘storming’ and proactively, preemptively changing the trajectory of the team

Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development (here)

76

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Actions

Results

Type I: Single-loop Learning

Actions

Results

Type I: Single-loop Learning

Assumptions

Type II: Double-loop Learning

We are on a learning journey – What does it mean to learn?

If we don’t get the results we expect we change our actions

What if we were aiming for the wrong results?

77

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

The box = all the data available that we could see and hear

The triangle = how we try to manage all the data

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

seeing

acting

Two filters or preferences are always at work

seeing preferences

acting preferences

Our temperaments summarize our preferences for seeing and acting

What is Type I vs Type II learning?

What is the Ladder of Inference?

What is the advocacy vs inquiry method?

read: Chris Argyris: theories of action, double-loop learning and organizational learning

78

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Personal Visions lead to Shared Visions

Awareness and Recognition of

Differences

Understanding & Advocacy of Personal Framework

Acknowledgement & Inquiry into Others’ Frameworks

Reconciliation of Positions and Consensus

What’s my point of view?

What’s their point of view?

How do you reconcile views?

service/steward overlay

requirs sincerity

and authenticity

79

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Leader

Champion/Sponsor/Target

Acknowledge

Reconcile

Inquire

Advocate

Transformational leadership is a trust-building journey towards the truth

Speaking Journey – Evolution to a common language

Doing Journey – Evolution to a common view

Different learning journeys to the truth

Change is as a journey

Gaining trust – explicitly acknowledging different world views – starts the reconciliation process

Seeking understanding on how beliefs were built – continues the process pf reconciliation

Sharing understanding on how beliefs were built – furthers the process pf reconciliation

Agreement isn’t the goal - fairness in the process – shared understanding is the goal – differences are the source of innovation and create resilience – forced agreements creates fragility and sudden collapses

How we build and facilitate learning journeys is the key to implementing and sustaining successful change

There is never a direct path

Build an Art Colony where we can trust each other

Facilitation Strategy - Humble Inquiry until we conflict then Generous ’Tit for Tat”

The truth exists and it is objective (if you don’t believe this you are doomed to failure)

Fragile Passive-Aggressive team

Anti Fragile Trust-based team

80

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Productively resolving conflict

All conflict is rooted in the desire to execute two actions that are contradictory in nature - they both can not occur at the same time - so we have to choose - we can’t have both

desired

action

desired action

person A - initiator

person B - counter proposer

these actions are in

contradiction

to each other

you can’t do both

(either physically impossible or because of resource constraints and the need to prioritize)

2 - acknowledge -

legitimacy of differences

necessary condition

goal

necessary condition

3 - inquire - clarify understanding/ interpretation of gap and assumptions of conditions necessary to close gap

create/ change

create/ change

both desire to close performance gap

4 - advocate- clarify understanding/ interpretation of gap and assumptions of conditions necessary to close gap

5 - reconcile and act - agree on the shared truth of how the system works - what the gap is and what action will close the gap

1 - acknowledge -

shared goal (or there is no conflict)

if we weren’t part of the same system we wouldn’t have the same goal and we wouldn’t have a conflict because our actions wouldn't matter

The Evaporating Cloud - Conflict Resolution Model

(here)

81

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

81

creating then leveraging different perspectives

Sensing

‘what do the facts tell us’

iNtuiton

‘what options do the facts suggest’

Thinking

‘what are the criteria for our decision’

Feeling

‘what impact will this have on those involved’

T

N

S

F

Engage the SJ’s and SP’s from two different perspectives

Engage the NT’s for their system perspective

Engage the NT’s for their system perspective

Engage the NF’s for their people perspective

Did we miss anything? problem - solution - stakeholders - team

Do we have a well-balanced and self-aware team so that we can effectively challenge ourselves to see what is collectively unknown?

The ‘Z Model’

(here)

82

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

NT – Team Member

NF – Team Member

SJ – Team Member

SP – Team Member

All the available data

The Reality of the World

Four different views on how to act based on seeing the same data

All leadership is transformational leadership – the challenge is reconciling views

comfort zone NT

comfort zone NF

comfort zone SJ

comfort zone SP

Transformational leadership needs to get people out of their comfort zones of seeing and doing

83

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Cognitive Dissonance

In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance occurs when a person holds two or more contradictory beliefsideas, or values, or participates in an action that goes against one of these three, and experiences psychological stress because of that. According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not psychologically consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent.[1] The discomfort is triggered by the person's belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein they try to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.[1] [2]

The environment (team, family, friends, society, etc.) says one thing (from their Temperament perspective) which we can’t reconcile to our temperament perspective (how we believe the world works) so it stresses us out

We are no trained in psychology, we are not consciously aware of Temperament Differences, so we take action to remove the stress

We hire, hang out with people who share the same world view, that is, the same temperament. This relives the stress created by cognitive dissonance. The outside world is now being described to us in a way that align with how we think it should work.

Now we are in trouble…

Systems (e.g. teams, families, societies) become increasingly fragile (that is anti-resilient over time) because the members become more alike and therefore unable to see or hear the things that can disrupt their lives. This is why everything is ‘fine’ until it suddenly isn’t, then it cracks catastrophically, like a mug that you hit and is fine until you hit a little too hard and then it completely shatters

We need to be able to develop trust to help people reconcile as a team

84

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

The Path to Fragility and Lack of Resilience to Changes in the Environment

NT – Team Leader

NF – Team Member

SJ – Team Member

SP – Team Member

comfort zone NT

comfort zone NF

comfort zone SJ

comfort zone SP

Make me comfortable, relieve my cognitive dissonance, agree with me

(low personal mastery)

Most organizations start as passive aggressive

I will unconsciously remove discomfit by hiring people who agree with me

Most organizations migrate towards high fragility, single world view

In both cases, we are closing out our ability to see and hear 75% of the available data

which you get away with in times of stability and ‘die’ in times of change

85

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Entrepreneurs focused on product

Relationship managers focused on customers

Operations managers focused on efficiency

The nature of our environment dictates how we need to think and act

SP Culture

NF Culture

SJ Culture

Transition

Transition

NT Culture

The nature of the change requirement will dictate whether it is transformational and what kind and how much effort is required to change

Identifying stress points is about identifying ‘mis-alignments’

86

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

legend:

MBTI - NT, NF, SJ, SP

DiSC - D, I, S, C

Social Styles - Analytical, Amiable, Driver, Expressive

Strengthsfinder

NT - rationals - strat/arch/sys

I - influence - communication

Analytical - logic

Thinking - working smarter

NF - idealists - relationship

S - steadiness - harmony

Amiable - cooperation

Relating - assisting people

SP - artisans - task

C - Conscientiousness - information

Expressive - excitement

Impacting - influencing people

SJ - guardians - process

D - dominance - control

Driver - results

Striving - working harder

ask assertiveness

tell assertiveness

task responsiveness

relationship responsiveness

‘ask to learn more about the system’

‘ask to learn more about the people’

‘’tell about how the process should be done’

‘’tell about how the task should be done

‘big picture’

‘details’

trust - ability to take earn the right for people to take direction from you without question it is personality based -

if we think alike, I trust you to act alike - each box thinks/acts differently

positive - optimistic

future oriented

realistic - pessimistic

present oriented

Aligning Frameworks for deeper insights into how to build trust

87

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

people

task

ask

tell

‘right method/tool’

‘right process’

‘right community’

‘right system’

‘Ask to learn more about the system’

‘Ask to learn more about the people’

‘’Tell about how the process should be done’

‘’Tell about how the task should be done

Constructive Engagement Begins with the Right Starting Point and Earning Trust

What do they primarily care about

How should you start to engage them to earn their trust, show that you understand them

positive - optimistic

future oriented

realistic - pessimistic

present oriented

‘Ask about the positive aspects of the issues’

‘Tell about the realities the present issues’

Trust is gained or lost in the first few sentences and then takes a long time to regain

88

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Conflict engagement tendency

‘flight’ - defer to learn

‘fight’ - confront to explain

Conflict resolution strategy

‘engage’ with the individual - help them to focus on urgency

‘neutralize’ the individual – help them to focus on engagement

Pro-actively anticipating reactions to conflict

asking

telling

Preferences for engagement

(how do you ask by ‘telling’)

(how do you tell by ‘asking’)

(Reconciling paradox of the need engage and move)

What happens if they are already in conflict?

What is the quickest way to earn the trust to resolve the conflict constructively?

89

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

core competency = core preference

strength

neutral

blocker

SJ - Process

NT - System

NF - Community

SP - Outcome

You excel (or could excel) at your gift (temperament that you are born with,

if you invest in earned value)

You need to at least be neutral everywhere else

Lack of awareness or interest in understanding weaknesses

in other temperaments blocks your ability to be effective

example - an NT with no mastery and no balance

mastery and balance

creates individual resilience

team mastery and balance

creates organizational resilience

best situation is strength and neutral

strength

neutral

blocker

strength

neutral

blocker

strength

neutral

blocker

Helping You and Your Team Achieve Mastery (skill development) and Resilience (awareness)

90

Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone

Brief Team Description:

Date:

Team Members:

Name Contact Information

Name Contact Information

Name Contact Information

Team Goals:

Task Goals (what we’ll accomplish) Process Goals (how we will work together)

Roles

Roles

Roles

Name Contact Information

Name Contact Information

Roles

Roles

Rules of conduct:

- Meeting frequency - Issue/risk tracking - Communication process/expectations - Conflict management - etc...

see Appendix B

Constructive Cycle Challenges

Support

Trust

CommunicationCollaboration

Organization

Shared Objectives

Forming

Norming

Performing Storming

Destructive Cycle

Distrust

DisinterestDivision

Disorganization

Individual Objectives

Dismantling

Violating

Failing

Support

Support

Support

Constructive Cycle

Challenges

Support

Trust

CommunicationCollaboration

Organization

Shared

Objectives

Forming

Norming

Performing Storming

Destructive Cycle

Distrust

DisinterestDivision

Disorganization

Individual

Objectives

Dismantling

Violating

Failing

Support

Support

Support

Interpretation

Action

Selection

Observation

Interpretation

Action

Selection

Observation

Interpretation

Action

Selection

Observation

Interpretation

Action

Selection

Observation

Interpretation

Action

Selection

Observation

Interpretation

Action

Selection

Observation

Interpretation

Action

Selection

Observation

Interpretation

Action

Selection

Observation

All Data

Gap

Conclusion

Different Conclusion(s )

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

we select some of the data

we interpret the data

we draw conclusions

we act

product leadership

customer intimacy

operational excellence

your company

-speed to market with new features -volume of new features

-speed of response -amount of customization

-volume of output -speed of delivery (factors in availability)

leader

laggard parity

leader

laggard parity

leader

laggard parity

product leadership

customer intimacy

operational excellence

your company

-speed to market with new features -volume of new features

-speed of response -amount of customization

-volume of output -speed of delivery (factors in availability)

leader

laggard parity

leader

laggard parity

leader

laggard parity

product leadership

customer intimacy

operational excellence

your company

-speed to market with new features -volume of new features

-speed of response -amount of customization

-volume of output -speed of delivery (factors in availability)

leader

laggard parity

leader

laggard parity

leader

laggard parity

NF

NT

SJ

SP

People

Purpose

Process

Product

NF

NT

SJ

SP

People

Purpose

Process

Product

NF

NT

SJ

SP

People

Purpose

Process

Product

NF

NT

SJ

SP

People

Purpose

Process

Product

NF

NT

SJ

SP

People

Purpose

Process

Product

NF

NT

SJ

SP

People

Purpose

Process

Product

NF

NT

SJ

SP

S D

L T

D S

L T

T L

S D

L T

D S

NF

NT

SJ

SP

S

D

L

T

D

S

L

T

T

L

S

D

L

T

D

S

NF

NT

SJ

SP

S D

L T

D S

L T

T L

S D

L T

D S

NF

NT

SJ

SP

S

D

L

T

D

S

L

T

T

L

S

D

L

T

D

S

strength

neutral

blocker

SJ - Process

NT - System

NF - Community

SP - Outcome

strength

neutral

blocker

strength

neutral

blocker

strength

neutral

blocker

strength

neutral

blocker

SJ -Process

NT -System

NF -Community

SP -Outcome

strength

neutral

blocker

strength

neutral

blocker

strength

neutral

blocker