team and leadership quiz
- Organizational Behavior - Assessing structure, culture, leadership and team dynamics to improve organizational effectiveness
Session 12 – Introducing Team Support
Spring 2021
Version 1
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Agenda:
Discuss course calendar and the next two weeks of assignments
Review HW Assignments and Quiz
Discuss Challenges of Team Development and Support
break
Discuss theories of Human Resource Development
Discuss core concepts in identifying resources and building teams
Introduce Challenges in Maintaining Team Cohesion without Suppressing Divergent Points of View
Session - Introducing Team Support
Objectives:
Discuss the course calendar and expectations for next two weeks
Discuss the challenges of developing and supporting teams
Integrate supplemental readings to discuss challenges of virtual teams
Reintroduce personality as a way of developing a deeper understanding of team selection, development and support
6:00 - 6:15 pm
6:15 – 6:45 pm
6:45 - 7:15 pm
Tomorrow:
Deeper dive on prep for HW presentations, explore more fully how we apply the methodology to the companies we are studying
Next week
Quiz 2 Opens
Two Weeks
Final HW 4 Presentations
Peer Assessment
2
7:30 - 8:30 pm
7:15 - 7:30 pm
Today
Tomorrow
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
introduction
course calendar
organizational behavior
structural assessment
symbolic (cultural) assessment
political (leadership) assessment
resource (team) assessment
3
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Overview of Sessions and Assignments
This is an organizational assessment ‘consulting methodology’, to help you better ‘see’, design and manage teams and organizations
Each session builds on the other to lead to a comprehensive executive presentation presenting findings, conclusions and recommendations
We are learning a methodology for understanding, defining, improving, innovating and managing teams and organizations
Group presentations will be limited to 15 minutes
4
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Organizational Behavior - Course Structure
The Advantage; Building a Cohesive Leadership Team
The Advantage;
Create Clarity
Stewardship: Choosing Service over Self-Interest
The Icarus Deception
Reframing Organizations: The Structural Frame
Reframing Organizations: The Human Resource (Team) Frame
Reframing Organizations: The Symbolic (Culture) Frame
Reframing Organizations: The Political (Leadership) Frame
The Purpose of Organizations - Service
The Purpose of Organizations - Creativity
Organizational Focus and Purpose
Assess the Purpose
Course Structure - Methodology
Assess the Formal Structure
Assess the Leadership
Build the Team
Philosophically we approach the discipline like a consultant. How do we describe an organization in a way that we can understand enablers and disablers of performance? How do we develop a point of view on what works and what can be improved?
Philosophically - the HW Assignments assume that you are not necessarily trying to change a large organization but to help the team you are managing to be better performers - better at fulfilling their purpose
HBS on Teams: Building Your Team’s Infrastructure
HBS on Teams: Building Close out Your Team
HBS on Teams: Building Manage Team Process
HBS on Teams: Building Manage Team Conflict
Organizational Assessment and Development
Teamwork Assessment and Development
Philosophically - the discussion forums help us to understand the focus and purpose of organizations
The Knowledge Creating Organization
The Focus of Organizations - Knowledge Creation
The Advantage- Organization Health
The Focus of Organizations - Health and Alignment
Assessing Structure
Assessing Capability
team-based
individual-based
Individual Self-Awareness and Personal Mastery
Please Understand Me II
Foundational Element to Better Understand and Assess Organizational Effectiveness
Philosophically - this book helps us to understand how to develop better self awareness and leverage it for better ‘other awareness’ to develop more proactive strategies for developing leaders and managing teams
Advanced applications to leadership, team development and management
5
The Advantage;
Over-Communicate Clarity
The Advantage; Reinforce Clarity
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
X
X
X
X
Strategy
Structure Alignment
Structure
Culture Alignment
Culture
Leadership
Alignment
Leadership
Team
Alignment
Organizational
Behavior
Alignment Drives Effectiveness
Re-alignment ensures sustainable success
Structure
Leadership
Team
Culture
Effective Organizations are Aligned with the Needs of their Environment
and create and manage tension
Overview of course
Organizations as interconnected teams which operate most effectively when there is close alignment between strategy, structure, culture, and leadership
Ongoing and evolving External and Internal (P.E.S.T. and S.W.O.T.) changes require continual adjustment and realignment
Organizational Behavior Alignment Model
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
How are we designed
How do we act
Create tension
Manage tension
‘Sisyphus’
6
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Establish your team
Manage your Team
Integrate new Team Members and Manage Conflict
Deliver Results and Reflect on Opportunities to Improve
Read:
Section 1: Build your Team’s Infrastructure: Ch.'s 1-7
Deliverables
Team Assessment
Team Charter
Do we understand our strengths, blind spots and potential points of conflict?
Have we established clear objectives and understand our roles and responsibilities?
Have we established a strong process to manage the work, stay on track and identify and resolve issues?
Do we understand how to reconcile differences about goals and process?
Have we established strong processes that facilitates the onboarding of new team members
Do we understand how to identify and collaboratively resolve risks?
Do we understand how to work with our key stakeholders to ensure we deliver what they want when they want it?
Have we debriefed and assessed what went well and where there are opportunities for improvement?
Read:
Section 2: Manage your Team Ch.'s 8-10
Deliverables
Team Process Assessment - 1/3
Read:
Section 2: Manage your Team: Ch.'s 11-13
Deliverables
Team Process Assessment - 2/3
Read:
Section 3: Close out Your Team: Ch.’s 14-15
Deliverables
Team Post-close Assessment
Do we have a strong team and process for managing team accountabilities?
Do we understand how to anticipate and manage conflict to ensure we can complete our objectives on-time?
Change
team
Building and managing effective teams is the heart of organizational effectiveness
Team Development and Management Assessment Framework
Are we able to effectively on-board new team members
refer
We will use our group assignments to learn how to develop a strong, resilient team
7
7
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
We are changing team assignments for HW 3 and 4
We want to understand how to onboard and integrate new team members
next peer assessments based on new groupings
8
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Team Homework
Assignment 4
Organizational Resource (team) Assessment and
Reflection on Team Close Out
organizational behavior
structural assessment
symbolic (cultural) assessment
political (leadership) assessment
resource (team) assessment
9
9
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Organizational Assessment and Development
Teamwork Assessment and Development
Organizational Team Support Assessment
The Advantage;
Reinforce Clarity
Reframing Organizations: The Human Resource (Team) Frame
HBS on Teams: Building Close out Your Team
Slide 1 - Re-establish Context
Establish context
Company, industry, age, size
Slide 2 – Culture Capability and Conflict Management
Describe how teams progress to high performance
Discuss Chris Argyris’ model of Advocacy and Inquiry
Discuss how this model combined with and understanding of Keirsey temperament types can be used to anticipate and manage conflict
Slide 3 - Assessment
Research the company you have selected and identify their approach to team development and management
Slide 4 - Recommendation
Develop a point of view on their approach to team development and management
Assess strengths and weaknesses
Identify opportunities for improvement
Slide 8
Slide 5
Slide 7
Team Process Application and Reflection
Reflections on Readings
Complete a process assessment
Slide 9
Reflections on Experience
(use the Keep/Start/Stop method)
Revise the team charter
Refer next slide
Presentation expectations - everyone presents - approximately 1-2 minutes per slide - 10-15 min/team
10
Slide 6
Complete a Team Culture and Capability Assessment
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Staying focused, delivering what was promised, managing differences to stay on track
How do we use our understanding of team differences to develop and strengthen cohesion without suppressing difference that could lead to useful insights
How do we continue use our understanding of team differences to anticipate and resolve conflicts?
11
What did we learn after you finished?
The Keep/Start/Stop Method (here)
What do we want to keep doing?
What do we want to start doing?
What do we want to stop doing?
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Complete a team process assessment
Revise the team charter
12
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Do we (I) have a strong core culture?
A strong understanding of what is important,
A strong sense of self (personal awareness) to know how to adapt to what is important
(this enables us to adapt, tells us what is important to see)
Do we (I) have the right Capability Alignment?
(this tells us what to adapt to, tells us what skills to develop)
13
13
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
NF
NT
SJ
SP
People
Purpose
Process
Product
culture:
tacit rules on what is seen and how what is seen is acted on as it is applied to focus, execution and development
Purpose
People
Process
Product
no focus/
planning paralysis
shared vision/
clear strategy and road map
no decisions/
consensus paralysis
co-creation/
strong engagement
no cooperation/
sub-process compliance
process rigor /
consistency and quality of output
no outcomes/ learning/fire fighting/
everything is crisis mgmt.
product/outcome rigor/
strong design
NT
NF
SJ
SP
The four dimensions of culture
Culture Assessment
Weak culture
Strong Culture
Culture is Built and Maintained Collectively – through balance and mastery
Each person has a unique temperament – that can contribute to the whole or detract – do we have organizational balance – do we have organizational mastery
What is the gap?
The gap is closed collectively by leveraging individual preferences and strengths
where should we focus attention and expectations – build shared mindset on what’s important – use industry phase to refine focus – ensure balance
14
14
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Do we (I) have strong core culture?
(this enables us to adapt, tells us what is important to see)
Do we (I) have the right Capability Alignment?
(this tells us what to adapt to, tells us what skills to develop)
15
15
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
NF
NT
SJ
SP
People
Purpose
Process
Product
The four dimensions of capability
Capability Assessment
capabilities:
explicit technical requirements required to
perform assigned work tasks
where should we focus training and development and support – build strengths – use industry phase to refine focus – ensure balance
strengths when env stable
weaknesses when env ambiguous
purpose
people
process
product
today oriented/tactical
task management
future oriented/strategic
business model/mind alignment
arms-length/
invest in contract/
specific job
co-creation/
invest in relationship/
connections
unit focus/
focus on dept tech/support/
knowledge - fluency
company focus/
focus on enterprise systems/support/
knowledge - fluency
specific task oriented/
high switching costs/
deep company specific know.
general function (eg mkt) oriented/
low switching cost/
deep ind. functional specific know.
assessment
continuum
weaknesses when env stable
strengths when env ambiguous
NT
NF
SJ
SP
the degree of change is low
the degree of change is high
16
16
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Quiz 2
Reflection on Leadership and Team Management
organizational behavior
structural assessment
symbolic (cultural) assessment
political (leadership) assessment
resource (team) assessment
17
17
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Areas of Coverage:
Introduction – based on Chapters 1-6:
What is your temperament?
What are the temperaments other people (at least one other person) who is/are important to you?
How could this knowledge (yours vs, theirs) help to drive consensus and mitigate conflict?
Team building – building a team– based on Chapter 7
How does an understanding of how strong relationships are built help you to identify strong fit and potentially conflicting personalities? How does it apply to building and managing a team.
Who are you most likely to connect with? Who are you most likely to have conflict with?
How does this knowledge help you to anticipate conflict? How does it help you to anticipate blind spots? With this knowledge what can you do to preemptively mitigate the risk?
Team development – developing a team– based on Chapter 8
How does an understanding how parents can best support the development of their children help you understand how to develop your team?
What is your learning style and how do you like to grow and develop? How do other learning styles differ from your own?
How could this knowledge help you to develop more effective change management programs?
What are some of the challenges in developing team and organizational capability when there are different learning styles?
Leadership and Intelligence – developing leadership capability– based on Chapter 9
How does an understanding of different leadership styles and intelligence traits lead to a better understanding of you identify develop and support leaders of change initiatives?
How would you develop and support a leader that looks like you? What kind of leadership roles would you put them in?
How would you develop and support a leader that looks different from you? What kind of leadership roles would you put them in?
Summary
What are your initial thoughts on who needs to be on your team, who your leaders will be and what is the organization or individual you would like to help change?
How would your knowledge of the subject areas covered in this book help you to be successful at helping them to understand the need to change then helping them to stay on the change journey?
Process:
read assigned chapters
address questions
be prepared to present answers in class
there is no need to prepare a report
there is no requirement to submit to NYU classes
Please Understand Me II – Temperament, Character and Intelligence
To understand organizations, we need to understand ourselves - organizations have personalities - studying our own personality is the best way to understand an organizations’ personality
Session 2
Session 8
Session 11
18
18
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
18
19
Session 12
Team building – building a team– based on Chapter 7 Mating
How does an understanding of how strong relationships are built help you to identify strong fit and potentially conflicting personalities? How does it apply to building and managing a team.
Who are you most likely to connect with? Who are you most likely to have conflict with?
How does this knowledge help you to anticipate conflict? How does it help you to anticipate blind spots? With this knowledge what can you do to preemptively mitigate the risk?
Team development – developing a team– based on Chapter 8 Parenting
How does an understanding how parents can best support the development of their children help you understand how to develop your team?
What is your learning style and how do you like to grow and develop? How do other learning styles differ from your own?
How could this knowledge help you to develop more effective change management programs?
What are some of the challenges in developing team and organizational capability when there are different learning styles?
It is not our purpose to become each other; it is to recognize the other, to learn to see the other and honor him for what he is.
—Hermann Hesse
And yet another factor involved in our choice of mate, at least as powerful if not more, is temperament. — we will select our mate according to temperament.
romantic attractions are not random and indiscriminate but show clear patterns and frequencies.
how does this relate to team building and team effectiveness
who are the team members most likely to get along and why
who are the team members most likely to have conflicts and why
SJ-SP
NT-NF
Let us beware and beware and beware...of having an ideal for our children. So doing, we damn them.
—D.H. Lawrence
How do we tend to want to develop and support team members? The way we would want to? Why is this potentially very bad?
The truth is that kids of different temperament will develop in entirely different directions, no matter what the parents do to discourage one direction in favor of another.
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Quiz 2 - Reflection of Leadership and Team Management
Open book
Take - home
Timed 1 1/5 hours
Three short answers - 4-5 paragraphs each (1½ pages)
Reflections on Keirsey and McKinsey
Questions:
33 pts.
33 pts.
34 pts.
20
Team building – building a team– based on Chapter 7
How does an understanding of how strong relationships are built help you to identify strong fit and potentially conflicting personalities? How does it apply to building and managing a team.
Who are you most likely to connect with? Who are you most likely to have conflict with?
How does this knowledge help you to anticipate conflict? How does it help you to anticipate blind spots? With this knowledge what can you do to preemptively mitigate the risk?
Team development – developing a team– based on Chapter 8
How does an understanding how parents can best support the development of their children help you understand how to develop your team?
What is your learning style and how do you like to grow and develop? How do other learning styles differ from your own?
How could this knowledge help you to develop more effective change management programs?
What are some of the challenges in developing team and organizational capability when there are different learning styles?
Leadership and Intelligence – developing leadership capability– based on Chapter 9
How does an understanding of different leadership styles and intelligence traits lead to a better understanding of you identify develop and support leaders of change initiatives?
How would you develop and support a leader that looks like you? What kind of leadership roles would you put them in?
How would you develop and support a leader that looks different from you? What kind of leadership roles would you put them in?
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
21
The Challenge of Team Development and Support
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Readings:
How do we build strong teams
How does being virtual impact team development
How do we proactively anticipate and manage team conflict
Teams are the heart of organizations. They must be developed and supported to be successful
22
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
23
How do we build strong teams
INCREASINGLY, WORK IS TEAMWORK. But the structures, cultures, and practices in many companies make collaboration within and across teams difficult. The various drivers of collaborative dysfunction reveal the shortcomings of standard solutions such as formal redesigns (think “spans” and “layers”), collaborative tool deployments, and the current craze for Agile methodologies that often underperform because they assume a one-size-fits-all solution. By understanding how the six dysfunctions described above play out and identifying which ones exist at your company, you’ll be on your way to creating a truly collaborative workplace.
DYSFUNCTION #1: Hub-and-Spoke Networks
DYSFUNCTION #2: Disenfranchised Nodes
DYSFUNCTION #3: Misaligned Nodes
DYSFUNCTION #4: Overwhelmed Nodes
DYSFUNCTION #5: Isolated Networks
DYSFUNCTION #6: Priority Overload
How do we proactively anticipate and manage team conflict
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
24
How does being virtual impact team development
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
25
Theories on Human Resource Development
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Chapter 6 People and Organizations
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
People and Organizations
Human Resource Assumptions
Human Needs
Work and Motivation
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Theory X and Theory Y
Personality and Organization
Human Capacity and the Changing Employment Contract
27
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Human Resource Assumptions
Organizations exist to serve human needs
People and organizations need each other
When the fit between individual and system is poor, one or both suffer
A good fit benefits both
28
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Human Needs
Concept of “need” controversial
Economists: people’s willingness to trade dissimilar items disproves concept
Psychologists: need, or motive is useful way to talk about enduring preferences for some experiences
Needs a product of both nature and nurture
Genes determine initial trajectory
Experience and learning profoundly influence preferences
29
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Maslow’s Need Hierarchy
Needs arrayed in hierarchy
Lower needs are “pre-potent”
Higher needs more important after lower are satisfied
Maslow’s hierarchy
Self-actualization
Esteem
Belongingness, love
Safety
Physiological
30
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y
Theory X
Worker's passive and lazy, prefer to be led, resist change
Theory Y
Management’s task to ensure workers meet their important needs while they work
Either theory can be self-fulfilling prophesy
31
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Argyris Personality and Organization
Traditional management principles produce conflict between people and organizations
Task specialization: narrow, boring jobs requiring few skills
Directive leadership: makes workers dependent, treats them like children
Ways workers adapt to frustration
Withdraw
Become passive, apathetic
Resist—deception, featherbedding, or sabotage
Climb the hierarchy
Form groups (labor unions)
Teach children that work is unrewarding
32
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Human Capacity and the Changing Employment Contract
Global trends pushing organizations in two different directions
Lean and mean: downsize, outsource, hire temps and contractors
Win with talent: build competent, well-trained workforce
Shift from production economy to information economy produces skill gaps
33
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Conclusion
Organizations need people and people need organizations; the trick is to align their needs
Key dilemma: lean and mean versus invest in people?
34
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
35
Identifying Resources and Building Teams
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Chapter 7 Improving Human Resource Management
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Google Get Better People and Treat Them Better = Better Performance
On-site perks include free on-site parking, health clinics, haircuts, fitness classes, oil change and bike repair, valet parking, free laundry services, and gourmet meals
“The company culture truly makes workers feel they’re valued and respected as a human being, not as a cog in a machine.” (Google employee)
37
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Strategies for Improving Human Resource Management
Develop and Implement a Human Resource Philosophy
Hire the Right People
Keep Employees
Invest in Employees
Empower Employees
Promote Diversity
38
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Improving Human Resource Management (II)
Getting There: Training and Organization
Survey Feedback
Evolution of OD
39
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Hire the Right People
Know what you want, be selective
Hire people who bring the right skills and attitudes
Hire those who fit the mold
40
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Reward well and protect jobs
Promote from within
Powerful performance incentive
Increases trust and loyalty
Capitalizes on knowledge and skills
Reduces errors
Increases the likelihood to think longer-term
Share the wealth: Give workers a stake in organization’s success
Keep Employees
41
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Invest in Employees
Invest in learning
Create opportunities for development
42
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Provide Information and Support
Make performance data available and teach workers how to use them
Encourage workers to think like owners
Everyone gets a piece of the action
Foster Autonomy and Participation
Redesign Work
Build Self-Managing Teams
Promote Egalitarianism
Empower Employees
43
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Promote Diversity
Develop explicit, consistent diversity philosophy, strategy
Hold managers accountable
44
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Getting There Training and Organization Development
Barriers to better human resource management
Management reluctance
Disrupts established patterns, relationships
Lack of communication and interpersonal skills
Training and OD to build capacity
Disrupts established patterns, relationships
Lack of communication and interpersonal skills
45
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Conclusion
High-involvement management strategies:
Strengthen employee-organization bond
Pay well, share the benefits
Job security
Promote from within
Training and development
Empower and improve quality of work-life
Participation, democracy, egalitarianism
Job enrichment, teaming
Promote diversity
46
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
47
Building Capability to Hire the Right People and Develop a Team -
The Advantage: Reinforce Clarity
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity
Objectives:
Define Reinforcing Clarity.
Impact on Recruiting and Hiring.
Impact on Interviewing.
Impact on New Employee Orientation.
Impact on Performance Management.
Impact on Compensation and Rewards.
Impact on Recognition.
Impact on Firing.
Terms:
Human Systems in Organizations
Live for Fit
Real-Time Recognition
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity
What is Reinforcing Clarity?
The answers to the Six Critical Questions for clarity should become embedded in the fabric of the organization.
Therefore, every human system in the organization, every process that involves people should reinforce the answers to these questions.
Impact on Recruiting and Hiring
There should be an effort to “live for fit,” as opposed to technical interviewing.
The best approach for hiring is to have just enough structure to ensure consistency and adherence to core values.
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity
Impact on Interviewing
Interviewing must be simple and flexible. There must be some involvement from the leadership team for guidance.
Impact on New Employee Orientation
New employee orientation needs to reinforce the answers to the Six Questions. It is a short window of time and should not be wasted.
Impact on Performance Management
Clarity as to what is expected as well as feedback is necessary. Coaching must be emphasized in order to build trust. Again, clear direction is important, and conversation must be stimulated.
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity
Impact on Compensation and Rewards
Compensation and rewards give staff an incentive to do what is best for the organization.
Compensation and rewards must be consistent with the answers of the Six Questions – simple and understandable.
Impact on Recognition
Recognition must be real-time. Recognition is a behavior driver. Don’t throw money at the problem; use gratitude and appreciation.
Impact on Firing
Firing is a decision driven by an organization’s values.
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Checklist for Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity
The organization has a simple way to ensure that new hires are carefully selected based on company’s values.
New people are brought into the organization by thoroughly teaching them about the six elements of clarity.
Managers throughout the organization have a simple, consistent, and non-bureaucratic system for setting goals and reviewing progress with employees. That system is customized around the elements of clarity.
Employees who don’t fit the values are managed out of the organization. Poor performers who do fit the values are given the coaching and assistance they need to succeed.
Compensation and reward systems are built around the values and goals of the organization.
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Book reports
Organizational Focus on Services and Creativity
organizational behavior
structural assessment
symbolic (cultural) assessment
political (leadership) assessment
resource (team) assessment
53
53
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Access the book: ‘Stewardship Choosing Service over Self-Interest’ at the NYU Library (here)
Read Part A
Answer the questions (2-3 pages) and upload to NYU Classes
Book reports
Upload before Session 10
Access the book: ‘Icarus Deception’ on NYU Classes (instructor upload)
Read the full book
Answer the questions: (2-3 pages) and upload to NYU Classes
Upload before Session 12
What does it mean to to replace leadership with stewardship?
What does it mean to choose partnership over patriarchy?
What does it mean to choose adventure over safety?
What does it mean to choose service over self-interest?
How could you embrace this in your organization?
What does the statement, ‘You are not your career’, mean?
What is the Icarus Deception and what does it mean for you?
Why make art? Why is art frightening?
What is the connection economy? How do you reconcile this to a traditional organization? How will you reconcile the paradox?
54
How do we reconcile the needs to have clarity and alignment with the need to foster creativity, independence and conflict
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
55
What does the statement, ‘You are not your career’, mean?
your ability to follow instructions is not the secret to your success
how do you bring your best to work
how do you encourage other to
why is this hard? good?
What is the Icarus Deception and what does it mean for you?
how do you disobey without being disobedient?
Why make art? Why is art frightening?
Art is the new safety zone?
Change requires us to be artists/
Why is that hard? Good?
What is the connection economy? How do you reconcile this to a traditional organization? How will you reconcile the paradox?
How do you create connections?
How do cross-connections exist in hierarchical structures?
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
56
Challenges in Maintaining Team Cohesion without Suppressing Divergent Points of View
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Chapter 8 Interpersonal and Group Dynamics
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Interpersonal and Group Dynamics
Interpersonal Dynamics
Emotional Intelligence
Management Styles
Groups and Teams in Organizations
58
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Interpersonal Dynamics
Managers spend much of their time in relationships
Three recurrent questions regularly haunt managers
What is really happening in this relationship?
Why do other people behave as they do?
What can I do about it?
59
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Interpersonal Dynamics (II)
Argyris and Schön’s theories for action:
Espoused theory: How individuals describe, explain, or predict their own behavior
Theory-in-use: The program that governs an individual’s actions
Model I: Theory in use
Model I: Assumptions
Model II: Assumptions
The Perils of Self-Protection
60
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Model I: Theory in use
61
| Core Values (Governing Variables) | Action Strategies | Consequences for Relationships | Consequences for Learning |
| Define and achieve your own goals | Design and manage unilaterally | You’re seen as defensive, inconsistent, selfish | Self-sealing |
| Maximize winning, minimize losing | Own and control what’s relevant to you | You generate defensiveness | Single-loop learning |
| Avoid negative feelings | Protect yourself | You reinforce mistrust, conformity, avoiding risk | Private testing of assumptions |
| Be rational | Unilaterally protect others | Key issues become undiscussable | Unconscious collusion to avoid learning |
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Model I Assumptions
Problems caused by the other person
Since they caused the problem, get them to change
Refusal or defensiveness proves they caused problem
If they resist, intensify pressure, protect them (to avoid discomfort), or reject them
If you don’t succeed, it’s their fault; you’re not responsible
62
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Model II Assumptions
Focus on common goals, mutual influence
Communicate openly, test beliefs publicly
Combine advocacy with inquiry
63
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Advocacy and Inquiry
| Assertive | Integrative |
| Passive | Accommodating |
High
High
Low
Low
Inquiry
Advocacy
64
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Emotional Intelligence
Emotional Intelligence: awareness of self and others, ability to deal with emotions and relationships (Salovey and Mayer)
Management bestseller: Daniel Goleman’s Emotional Intelligence
EI more important than IQ to managerial success
Individuals with low EI and high IQ are dangerous in the workplace
65
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Management Styles
Lewin, Lippitt, and White: autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire leadership
Myers-Briggs Inventory
Introversion versus extraversion
Sensing versus intuition
Thinking versus feeling
Judging versus perceiving
66
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Management Styles (II)
“Big 5 Model”
Extraversion—enjoying others and seeking them out
Agreeableness—getting along with others
Conscientiousness—orderly, planful, hard working
Neuroticism—difficulty controlling negative feelings
Openness to experience—preference for novelty and creativity
67
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Groups and Teams in Organizations
Informal Roles
Informal Group Norms
Interpersonal Conflict in Groups
Leadership and Decision Making in Groups
68
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Informal Roles
Informal role: unwritten, often unspoken expectation about how an individual will behave in the group
Individuals prefer different roles: some prefer to be active and in control, others prefer to stay in the background
Individuals who can’t find a comfortable role may withdraw or become troublemakers
Individuals may compete over the same role (e.g., two people who want to run things), hindering group effectiveness
69
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Informal Group Norms
Informal norm: unwritten rule about what individuals have to do to be members in good standing
Norms need to align with task and preferences of group members
Norms often develop unconsciously; groups do better to discuss how they want to operate
70
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Handling Interpersonal Conflict in Groups
Develop skills
Agree on basics
Search for interests in common
Experiment
Doubt your infallibility
Treat conflict as a group responsibility
71
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Leadership and Decision Making in Groups
The question: How we will steer the group?
Leadership is essential, but may be shared and fluid
Leaders who over control or understructure produce frustration, ineffectiveness
72
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Conclusion
Employees bring social and personal needs to the workplace
Individuals’ social skills or competencies are a critical element
Though often frustrating, groups can be both satisfying and efficient
73
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
74
Anticipating and Managing Conflict
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Eliyahu Goldratt
75
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Can we anticipate storming and provide the right kind of support to change the dynamic?
Developing/ Planning Strategy
Executing
Plan
Reviewing Output
Integrating Output
NT
NF
SJ
SP
Collectively 80% of the world
Realists (pessimists)
Tell-oriented
Conflict drivers
Collectively 20% of the world
Futurists (optimists)
Ask-oriented
Consensus drivers
Always pushing for an implementation (from two exact opposite perspectives) and always wanting to skip insight and planning
Always pushing for an insight and planning (from two exact opposite perspectives) and less interested in the details of implementation and output
Understanding and using the ‘Conflict Anticipation Matrix’©
anticipating ‘storming’ and proactively, preemptively changing the trajectory of the team
Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development (here)
76
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Actions
Results
Type I: Single-loop Learning
Actions
Results
Type I: Single-loop Learning
Assumptions
Type II: Double-loop Learning
We are on a learning journey – What does it mean to learn?
If we don’t get the results we expect we change our actions
What if we were aiming for the wrong results?
77
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
The box = all the data available that we could see and hear
The triangle = how we try to manage all the data
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
seeing
acting
Two filters or preferences are always at work
seeing preferences
acting preferences
Our temperaments summarize our preferences for seeing and acting
What is Type I vs Type II learning?
What is the Ladder of Inference?
What is the advocacy vs inquiry method?
read: Chris Argyris: theories of action, double-loop learning and organizational learning
78
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Personal Visions lead to Shared Visions
Awareness and Recognition of
Differences
Understanding & Advocacy of Personal Framework
Acknowledgement & Inquiry into Others’ Frameworks
Reconciliation of Positions and Consensus
What’s my point of view?
What’s their point of view?
How do you reconcile views?
service/steward overlay
requirs sincerity
and authenticity
79
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Leader
Champion/Sponsor/Target
Acknowledge
Reconcile
Inquire
Advocate
Transformational leadership is a trust-building journey towards the truth
Speaking Journey – Evolution to a common language
Doing Journey – Evolution to a common view
Different learning journeys to the truth
Change is as a journey
Gaining trust – explicitly acknowledging different world views – starts the reconciliation process
Seeking understanding on how beliefs were built – continues the process pf reconciliation
Sharing understanding on how beliefs were built – furthers the process pf reconciliation
Agreement isn’t the goal - fairness in the process – shared understanding is the goal – differences are the source of innovation and create resilience – forced agreements creates fragility and sudden collapses
How we build and facilitate learning journeys is the key to implementing and sustaining successful change
There is never a direct path
Build an Art Colony where we can trust each other
Facilitation Strategy - Humble Inquiry until we conflict then Generous ’Tit for Tat”
The truth exists and it is objective (if you don’t believe this you are doomed to failure)
Fragile Passive-Aggressive team
Anti Fragile Trust-based team
80
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Productively resolving conflict
All conflict is rooted in the desire to execute two actions that are contradictory in nature - they both can not occur at the same time - so we have to choose - we can’t have both
desired
action
desired action
person A - initiator
person B - counter proposer
these actions are in
contradiction
to each other
you can’t do both
(either physically impossible or because of resource constraints and the need to prioritize)
2 - acknowledge -
legitimacy of differences
necessary condition
goal
necessary condition
3 - inquire - clarify understanding/ interpretation of gap and assumptions of conditions necessary to close gap
create/ change
create/ change
both desire to close performance gap
4 - advocate- clarify understanding/ interpretation of gap and assumptions of conditions necessary to close gap
5 - reconcile and act - agree on the shared truth of how the system works - what the gap is and what action will close the gap
1 - acknowledge -
shared goal (or there is no conflict)
if we weren’t part of the same system we wouldn’t have the same goal and we wouldn’t have a conflict because our actions wouldn't matter
The Evaporating Cloud - Conflict Resolution Model
(here)
81
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
81
creating then leveraging different perspectives
Sensing
‘what do the facts tell us’
iNtuiton
‘what options do the facts suggest’
Thinking
‘what are the criteria for our decision’
Feeling
‘what impact will this have on those involved’
T
N
S
F
Engage the SJ’s and SP’s from two different perspectives
Engage the NT’s for their system perspective
Engage the NT’s for their system perspective
Engage the NF’s for their people perspective
Did we miss anything? problem - solution - stakeholders - team
Do we have a well-balanced and self-aware team so that we can effectively challenge ourselves to see what is collectively unknown?
The ‘Z Model’
(here)
82
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
NT – Team Member
NF – Team Member
SJ – Team Member
SP – Team Member
All the available data
The Reality of the World
Four different views on how to act based on seeing the same data
All leadership is transformational leadership – the challenge is reconciling views
comfort zone NT
comfort zone NF
comfort zone SJ
comfort zone SP
Transformational leadership needs to get people out of their comfort zones of seeing and doing
83
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Cognitive Dissonance
In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance occurs when a person holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values, or participates in an action that goes against one of these three, and experiences psychological stress because of that. According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not psychologically consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent.[1] The discomfort is triggered by the person's belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein they try to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.[1] [2]
The environment (team, family, friends, society, etc.) says one thing (from their Temperament perspective) which we can’t reconcile to our temperament perspective (how we believe the world works) so it stresses us out
We are no trained in psychology, we are not consciously aware of Temperament Differences, so we take action to remove the stress
We hire, hang out with people who share the same world view, that is, the same temperament. This relives the stress created by cognitive dissonance. The outside world is now being described to us in a way that align with how we think it should work.
Now we are in trouble…
Systems (e.g. teams, families, societies) become increasingly fragile (that is anti-resilient over time) because the members become more alike and therefore unable to see or hear the things that can disrupt their lives. This is why everything is ‘fine’ until it suddenly isn’t, then it cracks catastrophically, like a mug that you hit and is fine until you hit a little too hard and then it completely shatters
We need to be able to develop trust to help people reconcile as a team
84
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
The Path to Fragility and Lack of Resilience to Changes in the Environment
NT – Team Leader
NF – Team Member
SJ – Team Member
SP – Team Member
comfort zone NT
comfort zone NF
comfort zone SJ
comfort zone SP
Make me comfortable, relieve my cognitive dissonance, agree with me
(low personal mastery)
Most organizations start as passive aggressive
I will unconsciously remove discomfit by hiring people who agree with me
Most organizations migrate towards high fragility, single world view
In both cases, we are closing out our ability to see and hear 75% of the available data
which you get away with in times of stability and ‘die’ in times of change
85
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Entrepreneurs focused on product
Relationship managers focused on customers
Operations managers focused on efficiency
The nature of our environment dictates how we need to think and act
SP Culture
NF Culture
SJ Culture
Transition
Transition
NT Culture
The nature of the change requirement will dictate whether it is transformational and what kind and how much effort is required to change
Identifying stress points is about identifying ‘mis-alignments’
86
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
legend:
MBTI - NT, NF, SJ, SP
DiSC - D, I, S, C
Social Styles - Analytical, Amiable, Driver, Expressive
Strengthsfinder
NT - rationals - strat/arch/sys
I - influence - communication
Analytical - logic
Thinking - working smarter
NF - idealists - relationship
S - steadiness - harmony
Amiable - cooperation
Relating - assisting people
SP - artisans - task
C - Conscientiousness - information
Expressive - excitement
Impacting - influencing people
SJ - guardians - process
D - dominance - control
Driver - results
Striving - working harder
ask assertiveness
tell assertiveness
task responsiveness
relationship responsiveness
‘ask to learn more about the system’
‘ask to learn more about the people’
‘’tell about how the process should be done’
‘’tell about how the task should be done
‘big picture’
‘details’
trust - ability to take earn the right for people to take direction from you without question it is personality based -
if we think alike, I trust you to act alike - each box thinks/acts differently
positive - optimistic
future oriented
realistic - pessimistic
present oriented
Aligning Frameworks for deeper insights into how to build trust
87
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
people
task
ask
tell
‘right method/tool’
‘right process’
‘right community’
‘right system’
‘Ask to learn more about the system’
‘Ask to learn more about the people’
‘’Tell about how the process should be done’
‘’Tell about how the task should be done
Constructive Engagement Begins with the Right Starting Point and Earning Trust
What do they primarily care about
How should you start to engage them to earn their trust, show that you understand them
positive - optimistic
future oriented
realistic - pessimistic
present oriented
‘Ask about the positive aspects of the issues’
‘Tell about the realities the present issues’
Trust is gained or lost in the first few sentences and then takes a long time to regain
88
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Conflict engagement tendency
‘flight’ - defer to learn
‘fight’ - confront to explain
Conflict resolution strategy
‘engage’ with the individual - help them to focus on urgency
‘neutralize’ the individual – help them to focus on engagement
Pro-actively anticipating reactions to conflict
asking
telling
Preferences for engagement
(how do you ask by ‘telling’)
(how do you tell by ‘asking’)
(Reconciling paradox of the need engage and move)
What happens if they are already in conflict?
What is the quickest way to earn the trust to resolve the conflict constructively?
89
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
core competency = core preference
strength
neutral
blocker
SJ - Process
NT - System
NF - Community
SP - Outcome
You excel (or could excel) at your gift (temperament that you are born with,
if you invest in earned value)
You need to at least be neutral everywhere else
Lack of awareness or interest in understanding weaknesses
in other temperaments blocks your ability to be effective
example - an NT with no mastery and no balance
mastery and balance
creates individual resilience
team mastery and balance
creates organizational resilience
best situation is strength and neutral
strength
neutral
blocker
strength
neutral
blocker
strength
neutral
blocker
Helping You and Your Team Achieve Mastery (skill development) and Resilience (awareness)
90
Copyright © 2021 Thomas Mazzone
Brief Team Description:
Date:
Team Members:
Name Contact Information
Name Contact Information
Name Contact Information
Team Goals:
Task Goals (what we’ll accomplish) Process Goals (how we will work together)
Roles
Roles
Roles
Name Contact Information
Name Contact Information
Roles
Roles
Rules of conduct:
- Meeting frequency - Issue/risk tracking - Communication process/expectations - Conflict management - etc...
see Appendix B
Constructive Cycle Challenges
Support
Trust
CommunicationCollaboration
Organization
Shared Objectives
Forming
Norming
Performing Storming
Destructive Cycle
Distrust
DisinterestDivision
Disorganization
Individual Objectives
Dismantling
Violating
Failing
Support
Support
Support
Constructive Cycle
Challenges
Support
Trust
CommunicationCollaboration
Organization
Shared
Objectives
Forming
Norming
Performing Storming
Destructive Cycle
Distrust
DisinterestDivision
Disorganization
Individual
Objectives
Dismantling
Violating
Failing
Support
Support
Support
Interpretation
Action
Selection
Observation
Interpretation
Action
Selection
Observation
Interpretation
Action
Selection
Observation
Interpretation
Action
Selection
Observation
Interpretation
Action
Selection
Observation
Interpretation
Action
Selection
Observation
Interpretation
Action
Selection
Observation
Interpretation
Action
Selection
Observation
All Data
Gap
Conclusion
Different Conclusion(s )
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
we select some of the data
we interpret the data
we draw conclusions
we act
product leadership
customer intimacy
operational excellence
your company
-speed to market with new features -volume of new features
-speed of response -amount of customization
-volume of output -speed of delivery (factors in availability)
leader
laggard parity
leader
laggard parity
leader
laggard parity
product leadership
customer intimacy
operational excellence
your company
-speed to market with new features -volume of new features
-speed of response -amount of customization
-volume of output -speed of delivery (factors in availability)
leader
laggard parity
leader
laggard parity
leader
laggard parity
product leadership
customer intimacy
operational excellence
your company
-speed to market with new features -volume of new features
-speed of response -amount of customization
-volume of output -speed of delivery (factors in availability)
leader
laggard parity
leader
laggard parity
leader
laggard parity
NF
NT
SJ
SP
People
Purpose
Process
Product
NF
NT
SJ
SP
People
Purpose
Process
Product
NF
NT
SJ
SP
People
Purpose
Process
Product
NF
NT
SJ
SP
People
Purpose
Process
Product
NF
NT
SJ
SP
People
Purpose
Process
Product
NF
NT
SJ
SP
People
Purpose
Process
Product
NF
NT
SJ
SP
S D
L T
D S
L T
T L
S D
L T
D S
NF
NT
SJ
SP
S
D
L
T
D
S
L
T
T
L
S
D
L
T
D
S
NF
NT
SJ
SP
S D
L T
D S
L T
T L
S D
L T
D S
NF
NT
SJ
SP
S
D
L
T
D
S
L
T
T
L
S
D
L
T
D
S
strength
neutral
blocker
SJ - Process
NT - System
NF - Community
SP - Outcome
strength
neutral
blocker
strength
neutral
blocker
strength
neutral
blocker
strength
neutral
blocker
SJ -Process
NT -System
NF -Community
SP -Outcome
strength
neutral
blocker
strength
neutral
blocker
strength
neutral
blocker