Why do student hates school lunches?

Topic: __________________________

Revised March 21, 2019

ORAL PRESENTATION GRADING SHEET ANCHOR 108

NAME: __________________________________________________ Date: _______________________

Grading Criteria:

• Email topic to instructors by deadline – 10 points SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

• Outline and works cited page in MLA format - 10 points SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

• Written self-evaluation – 10 points SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

• Time frame compliance - 10 points SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

(5-minute presentation with 2 min Q&A)

From To Points From To Points From To Points

2:01 3:00 7 points 5:15 6:00 9 points 9:01 10:00 5 points

3:01 4:00 8 points 6:01 7:00 8 points 10:01 11:00 4 points

4:01 4:44 9 points 7:01 8:00 7 points 11:01 12:00 3 points

4:45 5:15 10 points 8:01 9:00 6 points 12:01 13:00 2 points

• Incorporation of at least two critical thinking strategies discussed during the semester into your application of the framework to your topic. These can include, but are not limited to, prior questions, domains of thinking, elements of thought, and standards of thinking – 10 points

SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

• Visual Aid and Delivery of Oral presentation - 10 points

SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

• Oral Presentation-The ability to synchronize the main framework of the semester to include Exploration, Analysis, Synthesis and Synopsis/Storytelling - 40 points

SCORE: _____ OUT OF 40

• Any applicable penalties – (-5 points each) (missed presentation, banned topic) SCORE: _____

TOTAL: _____ OUT OF 100

Topic: __________________________

Revised March 21, 2019

Oral Presentation Grading Rubric

1) Identifies, researches and collects quality data points/sources that provides additional/valid data/evidence related to the issue. (EXPLORATION)

SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

Scant (0-5 points) Substantially Developed (5-10 points)

• Does not distinguish between fact, opinion, and value judgments in relationship to sources.

• Deals only with a single source and fails to discuss other possible perspectives, especially those salient to the issue.

• Does not have valid sources.

• Examines the evidence and sources of evidence; questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, completeness.

• Addresses perspectives noted previously, and additional diverse perspectives drawn from outside information.

2) Identifies and considers OTHER salient perspectives and positions that are important to the analysis of the issue. (ANALYSIS)

SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

Scant (0-5 points) Substantially Developed (5-10 points)

• Merely repeats information provided, taking it as truth, or denies evidence without adequate justification.

• Confuses associations and correlations with cause and effect.

• Observes cause and effect and addresses existing or potential consequences.

• Has used decision making matrix or other tool to clearly distinguish between facts, preferences, and value judgments.

3) Identifies and assesses the key assumptions and incorporates the analysis conducted into consideration of issues that the research/position presents. (SYNTHESIS)

SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

Scant (0-5 points) Substantially Developed (5-10 points)

• Does not examine the assumptions and ethical issues that underlie the issue, or does so superficially.

• Identifies and questions the validity of the assumptions and addresses the ethical dimensions that underlie the issue.

• Has used SWOT analysis, pro/con tool, or other tool to aid in consideration of issues.

• Has not only examined, but has formulated or exposed new opinions, information or constructs in relation to the topic.

4) Identifies and presents the STUDENT'S OWN perspective and position as it is important to the analysis of the issue. (SYNOPSIS/STORYTELLING)

SCORE: _____ OUT OF 10

Scant (0-5 points) Substantially Developed (5-10 points)

• Addresses a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify the established or presented position relative to one's own.

• Fails to establish other critical distinctions.

• Identifies, appropriately, one's own position on the issue, drawing support from experience, and information not available from assigned sources.

• Has acknowledged one’s own basis. • Provided a reasoned correlation between the first three parts of

the framework and the position taken on the topic.