| Oral Presentation Rubric |
| | 1-5 | 6-10 | 11-15 | 16-20 |
| Clarity | No apparent logical order of presentation, unclear focus | Content is loosely connected, transitions lack clarity | Sequence of information is well-organized for the most part, but more clarity with transitions is needed | Development of thesis is clear through use of specific and appropriate examples; transitions are clear and create a succinct and even flow |
| Presentation Length | Greatly exceeding or falling short of allotted time | Exceeding or falling short of allotted time | Remained close to the allotted time | Presented within the allotted time |
| Content | Topic is unclear and information appears randomly chosen | Topic is clear, but supporting information is disconnected | Information relates clearly to topic; many relevant points, but they are somewhat unstructured | Exceptional use of material that clearly relates to a focused thesis; abundance of various supported materials |
| Creativity | Delivery is repetitive with little or no variety in presentation techniques | Material presented with little interpretation or originality | Some apparent originality displayed through use of original interpretation of presented materials | Exceptional originality of presented material and interpretation |
| Speaking Skills | Monotone; speaker seemed uninterested in material | Little eye contact; fast speaking rate, little expression, mumbling | Clear articulation of ideas, but apparently lacks confidence with material | Exceptional confidence with material displayed through poise, clear articulation, eye contact, and enthusiasm |
| Attention to Audience | Did not attemtp to engage audience | Little attempt to engage audience | Engaged audience and held their attention most of the time by remaining on topic and presenting facts with enthusiasm | Engaged audience and held their attention throughout with creative articulation, enthusiasm, and clearly focused presentation |