Application 2
J.K. Hirsch et al.: Optimistic Exp lanatory StyleCrisis 2009; Vol. 30(1):48–53© 2009 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers
Short Report
Optimistic Explanatory Style as a Moderator of the Association
Between Negative Life Events and Suicide Ideation
Jameson K. Hirsch1, Karen Wolford2, Steven M. LaLonde3, Lisa Brunk4, and Amanda Parker-Morris5
1Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, 2Department of Psychology, SUNY College at Oswego, NY, 3John D. Hromi Center for Quality and Applied Statistics,
Rochester Institute of Technology, NY, 4Central Nassau Guidance and Counseling Services, NY, 5School of Professional Psychology, Pacific University, OR, all USA
Abstract. Background: Individuals experiencing negative and potentially traumatic life events are at increased risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors; however, suicidal outcomes are not inevitable. Individuals who attribute negative life events to external, transient, and specific factors, rather than internal, stable, and global self-characteristics, may experience fewer deleterious outcomes, including suicidal behavior. Aims: This study examines the moderating effect of explanatory style on the relationship between negative life experiences and suicide ideation in a college student sample. Methods: A total of 138 participants (73% female) were recruited from a rural, Eastern college and completed a self-report psychosocial assessment. Results: Optimistic explanatory style mitigates the influence of negative and potentially traumatic life events on thoughts of suicide, above and beyond the effects of hopelessness and depression. Conclusions: Beliefs about the origin, pervasiveness, and potential recurrence of a negative life event may affect psychological outcomes. Optimistic explanatory style was associated with reduced suicide ideation, whereas pessimistic explanatory style was associated with increased thoughts of suicide. Optimistic reframing of negative life events for clients may have treatment implications for the prevention of suicidal activity.
Keywords: optimistic explanatory style, suicide ideation and attempts, negative life events
Suicide is a leading cause of death during late adolescence and early adulthood (National Center for Health Statistics, 2004), and of years of potential life lost before age 65 (Na- tional Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2005), making it a critical public health problem among young people (US Public Health Service, 1999. Individuals who experience negative or potentially traumatic life events ap- pear to be at greater risk for suicide ideation (Dube et al., 2001; Kaplan, Pelcovitz, Salzinger, Mandel, & Weiner, 1997). Increased vulnerability for the development of sui- cidal thoughts may be a result of the influence of negative and chronic stressful events on social, emotional, and cog- nitive development (Sulik & Garfinkel, 1992). Individuals experiencing stressful and negative life events may also be unable to positively reframe or reappraise their negative life experiences (Carver, Pozo, Harris, Noriega, Scheier et al., 1993), resulting in hopelessness, depressive symptoms,
and suicidal activity. Such effects, however, may not be inevitable, and it is important to examine variables that might have a buffering effect on the impact of negative life events.
Research on negative and potentially traumatic life events has historically focused on resultant poor outcomes, with less emphasis placed on characteristics that might pro- tect against psychopathology or poor functioning (Violanti, 2001). For some individuals who experience trauma, psy- chopathology may not develop because of their use of sa- lubrious coping processes (Irwin, 1999; Tedeschi & Cal- houn, 1996). With regard to suicide, the ability to defend against the manifestation of suicidal thoughts and behav- iors may be partially the result of adaptive cognitive and emotional characteristics, such as an optimistic explanato- ry style, dispositional optimism, or future orientation (Hirsch & Conner, 2006; Hirsch et al., 2006; Scheier, Carv-
DOI 10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.48 Crisis 2009; Vol. 30(1):48–53 © 2009 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers
er, & Bridges, 2001). Optimistic explanatory style is de- fined as a tendency to make attributions about prior nega- tive events that are external, specific, and transient (Gill- ham, Shatte, Reivich, & Seligman, 2001), rather than mak- ing internal, global, and stable attributions, which is considered a pessimistic explanatory style. Optimistic ex- planatory style is associated with good health and longevity (Peterson, Seligman, & Vaillant, 1988), effective problem solving (Shatte, Gillham, & Reivich, 2000; Stark & Bos- well, 2000), decreased depression (Gillham et al., 2001; Seligman, Abramson, Semmel, & Von Baeyer, 1984), and faster recovery from depression (Seligman, Castellon, Cac- ciola, Schulman, Luborsky et al., 1988). Such benefits may occur via the use of active and adaptive coping strategies, a direct approach to solving problems, a belief in the attain- ability of future goals, and striving to overcome adversity (Miller, Manne, Taylor, Keates, & Dougherty, 1996; Pus- kar, Sereika, Lamb, Tusaie-Mumford, & McGuiness, 1999; Scheier & Carver, 1993; Scheier et al., 2001).
These findings reveal a trend toward better outcomes for optimists than pessimists across many situations; however, no studies specifically investigating optimistic explanatory style as a moderator of negative and potentially traumatic life events and suicide ideation were found in a review of the literature. This study examines the relationship between lifetime history of negative life events and suicide ideation in a college student sample and tests a moderator model of explanatory style as a buffering variable. It is hypothesized that optimistic explanatory style will moderate the influ- ence of negative life events on suicide ideation after con- trolling for covariates.
Methods
Participants
Participants were 138 volunteers (100 females, 73%) re- cruited from a rural, Eastern state college. A power analysis was conducted to determine the number of participants needed to achieve 80% power to detect a significant effect (p < .01), given the standard deviation of predictor vari- ables (xmean = 5) and correlation of residuals (r = .30), re- sulting in a necessary sample of 122 subjects. Parameter estimates were based on our previous research with college students (Hirsch & Conner, 2006). Informed consent was obtained. Participants ranged from 18–57 years old (xmean age = 22.5; median = 21; SD = 6.10). The sample was pri- marily white (79%), although several ethnic groups were represented, including black (4.5%), Native American (1.3%), Hispanic/Latin American (1.3%), and Asian (1%).
Measures
Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire (EASQ; Peterson & Villanova, 1988)
The EASQ is a 120-item questionnaire involving 24 sce- narios of negative events that assess attributional style. Re- spondents are given a brief scenario (e.g., “You lose your job”) and are asked to describe why this event happened to them. Respondents rate each scenario on scales of internal- ity, globality, stability, and importance. The EASQ predict- ed depression in college students and outpatients (Luten, Ralph, & Mineka, 1997). This measure exhibits adequate internal consistency (Reivich, 1995); in the current study, Cronbach’s α = .91.
Lifetime Incidence of Traumatic Events (LITE; Greenwald & Rubin, 1999)
The LITE-Student form is a 16-item self-report checklist designed to measure the occurrence and emotional impact of traumatic events. The 16 items cover a broad range of potential trauma and loss events, including emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, and neglect, and ask for an es- timate of emotional impact at both the time of occurrence and the present. The LITE has been used to assess traumatic events in older adolescents and their parents and has been shown to correlate positively with assessments of PTSD symptoms (Greenwald & Rubin, 1999). The authors report good to excellent test-retest reliability and adequate crite- rion validity against a structured interview (Greenwald & Rubin, 1999).
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996)
The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report measure of the presence and severity of cognitive, affective, somatic, and motivation- al symptoms of depression. The BDI-II predicted depression in a clinical college sample (Beck et al., 1996) and has exhib- ited adequate test-retest reliability (.93; Beck et al., 1996). In the current study, Cronbach’s α for the BDI-II = .92.
Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS; Beck, Weissman, Lester, & Trexler, 1974)
This scale assesses level of hopelessness via 20 true-false statements. The scale has adequate internal reliability (KR20 coefficient = .93), and test-retest reliability of .69 over 1 week and .66 over 6 weeks for patients with mixed diagnoses. The BHS predicted suicide ideation (Bonner & Rich, 1987), suicide attempts (Minkoff, Bergman, & Beck, 1973) and suicide completion in psychiatric outpatients (Beck, Brown, Berchick, Stewart, & Steer, 1990) and inpa-
J.K. Hirsch et al.: Optimistic Explanatory Style 49
© 2009 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers Crisis 2009; Vol. 30(1):48–53
tients (Keller & Wolfersdorf, 1993), and differentiated be- tween suicide attempters and completers (Beck, Steer, Ko- vacs, & Garrison, 1985). In the current study, Cronbach’s α = .87.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS; Beck, Kovacs, & Weissman, 1979)
The BSS is a 21-item self-report assessment of thoughts, attitudes, and intentions regarding suicide. The BSS has adequate internal consistency (coefficient α = .90, outpa- tient sample α = .87), demonstrates high face, convergent, and construct validity (Beck et al., 1979), exhibits adequate test-retest reliability (Beck & Steer, 1991), and predicted suicidal ideation in university students (Miller, Segal & Coolidge, 2001). In the current study, Cronbach’s α = .83.
Statistical Analyses
Independence of study variables was assessed using two- tailed bivariate correlation analyses (see Table 1). Hierarchi- cal, multiple linear regressions were utilized to conduct mod- erator analyses predicting suicide ideation, scored as a con- tinuous measure, according to accepted guidelines (Baron & Kenny, 1986); variables and covariates were entered on the first step, and the interaction term was entered on the second step. By design, all analyses controlled for depressive symp- toms (BDI-II), hopelessness (BHS), age, and gender (females are the reference group); however, we also ran these analyses without controlling for depression and hopelessness, and re- port these results. Predictor variables of optimistic explana- tory style and negative life events were centered prior to anal- yses to reduce multicollinearity occurring as a result of the moderator interaction (Aiken & West, 1991). To illustrate the moderator interaction, participants were categorized into high (pessimistic), medium, and low (optimistic) explanatory style groups using the mean score and cutoffs either one standard deviation above or below the mean.
Results
Forty-three percent of the sample (n = 59) had experienced at least one traumatic experience in their lifetime, with a mean occurrence of six traumatic life events (see Table 1). Slightly over 10% of the sample (n = 14) had made a pre- vious suicide attempt, and 85% (n = 115) endorsed past suicide ideation. Bivariate correlations indicated that neg- ative life events were significantly positively associated with depression (.21, p < .05) and suicide ideation (.26, p < .01). Optimistic explanatory style was significantly neg- atively associated with hopelessness (–.45; p < .01), de- pressive symptoms (–.48; p < .01), and suicide ideation (–.47; p < .01) (see Table 1).
An uncontrolled moderator model predicting the influence
Table 1: Bivariate correlations of study variables
Gender Depressive symptoms
Hopelessness Optimistic explanatory style
Negative life events Suicide ideation
Age –.01 –.09 –.08 .08 .35** .15
Gender – .15 .07 .00 –.04 .01
Depressive symptoms – – .72** –.48** .21* .53**
Hopelessness – – – –.45** .02 .56**
Optimistic explanatory style – – – – –.08 –.47**
Negative life events – – – – – .26**
Note: Depressive symptoms = Beck Depression Inventory – Second Edition; Hopelessness = Beck Hopelessness Scale; Optimistic explanatory style = Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire; Negative life events = Lifetime Incidence of Traumatic Events; Suicide ideation = Beck Scale of Suicide Ideation (BSS). Note: * = p < .05; ** = p < .01
Figure 1: Linear regression – plot of interaction between explanatory style and negative life events for suicide idea- tion. Note: Optimistic explanatory style = Expanded Attri- butional Style Questionnaire; Negative life events = Life- time Incidence of Traumatic Events; Suicide ideation = Beck Scale of Suicide Ideation (BSS).
50 J.K. Hirsch et al.: Optimistic Explanatory Style
Crisis 2009; Vol. 30(1):48–53 © 2009 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers
of optimistic explanatory style and traumatic life events, and their interaction, on suicide ideation, was tested and found to be significant; t = 2.54, p < .05, β = .19 (see Table 2). This moderating effect remained in a controlled model, covarying hopelessness and depressive symptoms; t = 2.10, p < .05, β = .14 (see Table 2). Individuals with a more optimistic explan- atory style were less likely to express suicidal ideation as a result of potentially traumatic life events, over and above the influence of hopelessness and depressive symptoms (see Fig- ure 1). Age and hopelessness, although covariates, were also significant predictors of suicide ideation.
Discussion
The experience of negative and potentially traumatic life events may contribute to the development of suicidal thoughts and behaviors; however, this effect may be buf- fered by adaptive cognitive characteristics. After control- ling for the effects of age, gender, depressive symptoms, and hopelessness, explanatory style moderated the associ- ation between trauma and suicide ideation. Our findings suggest that the manner in which an individual interprets the negative life experiences they encounter influences their level of suicidal ideation. In the context of potentially traumatic life events, individuals with an optimistic explan-
atory style report having less suicide ideation than individ- uals with a pessimistic explanatory style. Attributing a neg- ative life event to personal characteristics, believing that a negative life event might recur, or that experiencing a neg- ative life event will affect all areas of ones’ life, may con- tribute to the development or maintenance of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. On the other hand, if an individual avoids self blaming and can acknowledge a traumatic ex- perience as an isolated event with limited ramifications for other areas of their life then, perhaps, they may be at de- creased risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors.
Our findings may also have implications for the treat- ment of trauma-related suicidal thoughts and behaviors. In- dividuals who think positively about their future appear to be protected from some adverse medical and psychological outcomes (Achat, Kawachi, Spiro, DeMolles, & Sparrow, 2000), perhaps through the use of active adaptive strategies (Miller et al., 1996) or establishment of meaningful and supportive interpersonal relationships that foster optimism (Brissette, Scheier, & Carver, 2002). An individual who is able to explain his or her past in an optimistic manner and engender a positive outlook toward the future may reduce distress, thereby mitigating risk (Hawkins & Miller, 2003; Vaillant, 2003). Preliminary findings suggest that teaching individuals to think optimistically can increase hopefulness (Johnson, Crofton, & Feinstein, 1996) and reduce depres- sion in adolescents, college students, and outpatients being
Table 2: Explanatory style, negative life events and suicide ideation – multivariate linear regression
Model I – uncontrolled analysis Model II – controlled analysis
T-Value Un. β (SE) β CI (95%) T-Value Un. β (SE) β CI (95%) Step one Step one
Constant 0.86 1.15 (1.33) 0.00 –1.48, 3.78 Constant –0.91 –1.15 (1.27) 0.00 –3.67, 1.36
Age 1.60 0.09 (0.05) 0.13 –0.02, 0.19 Age 2.25* 0.11 (.04) 0.16 0.01, 0.20
Gender 0.23 0.16 (0.68) 0.02 –1.19, 1.50 Gender –0.44 –0.27 (.61) –0.03 –1.48, 0.94
Life events 2.14* 0.26 (0.12) 0.17 0.01, 0.50 Life Events 1.90 0.22 (.11) 0.13 –0.03, 0.14
Optimism 6.25*** 3.85 (0.61) 0.47 2.63, 5.06 Optimism 3.25** 2.04 (.62) 0.36 0.17, 0.58
Depressive symptoms 1.25 0.05 (.04) 0.14 –0.00, 0.44
Hopelessness 3.67*** 0.38 (.10) 0.25 0.79, 3.27
Step two Step two
Constant 0.68 0.90 (1.30) 0.00 –1.69, 3.48 Constant –1.00 –1.26 (1.25) 0.00 –3.74, 1.23
Age 1.53 0.08 (0.05) 0.12 –0.02, 0.18 Age 2.18* 0.10 (.04) 0.15 0.00, 0.19
Gender 0.81 0.56 (0.68) 0.06 –0.80, 1.91 Gender 0.07 0.04 (.62) 0.00 –1.19, 1.27
Life events 1.70 0.21 (0.12) 0.14 –0.03, 0.44 Life events 1.55 0.18 (.11) 0.12 –0.04, 0.40
Optimism 6.59*** 3.99 (0.60) 0.49 2.79, 5.18 Optimism 3.54*** 2.21 (.62) 0.27 0.97, 3.44
Optimism × Life events interaction
2.54* 0.72 (0.28) 0.19 0.15, 1.28 Optimism × Life events interaction
2.09* 0.53 (.25) 0.14 0.02, 1.04
Depressive symptoms 1.24 0.05 (.04) 0.13 –0.03, 0.13
Hopelessness 3.52*** 0.36 (.10) 0.35 0.15, 0.56
Note: Controlled analyses covary depressive symptoms and hopelessness. Depressive symptoms = Beck Depression Inventory – Second Edition; Hopelessness = Beck Hopelessness Scale; Optimistic explanatory style = Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire; Negative life events = Lifetime Incidence of Traumatic Events; Suicide ideation = Beck Scale of Suicide Ideation (BSS). Model I – Step One – R2 = .29, AdjR2 = .26, Step Two – R2 = .32, AdjR2 = .29 (p < .05). Model II – Step One – R2 = .45, AdjR2 = .42, Step Two – R2 = .47, AdjR2 = .44 (p < .05).
J.K. Hirsch et al.: Optimistic Explanatory Style 51
© 2009 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers Crisis 2009; Vol. 30(1):48–53
treated for depression (Barber & Derubeis, 2001; Gillham & Reivich, 2004; Puskar et al., 1999). Perhaps similar tech- niques could be used to decrease suicide ideation in patients who have experienced a traumatic life event.
Our novel findings must be interpreted within the con- text of several limitations. Cross-sectional data preclude the ability to examine causal effects of future orientation on the initiation or maintenance of suicidal ideation and behavior. Prospective research with diverse clinical and community samples is needed to determine whether the risk of suicidal behavior is lower in traumatized individuals who are able to construct a positive perspective on their past negative life events. Such an optimistic explanatory style may be advantageous in the prevention of suicide, and prospective investigation of the mechanisms by which fu- ture-oriented and optimistic cognitive characteristics might exert a protective effect in individuals who have experi- enced trauma is warranted. Further, potential detrimental effects of future orientation on psychological functioning should be explored (Segerstrom, 2001, 2005). Increased understanding of adaptive and future-oriented characteris- tics that might mitigate the development and expression of suicidal thoughts and behaviors may lead to the develop- ment of improved treatments.
References
Achat, H., Kawachi, I., Spiro, A.III, DeMolles, D.A., & Sparrow, D. (2000). Optimism and depression as predictors of physical and mental health functioning. The Normative Aging Study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 127–130.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Barber, J.P., & DeRubeis, R.J. (2001). Change in compensatory skills in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Psycho- therapy Practice and Research, 10(1), 8–13.
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, stra- tegic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Beck, A., Kovacs, M., & Weissman, A. (1979). Assessment of suicidal ideation: The Scale for Suicidal Ideators. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 861–875.
Beck, A., Steer, R., & Brown, G. (1996). Beck Depression Inven- tory-II. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Beck, A., Steer, R., Kovacs, M., & Garrison, B. (1985). Hopeless- ness and eventual suicide: A 10-year prospective study of pa- tients hospitalized with suicide ideation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 559–563.
Beck, A., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 861–865.
Beck, A.T., Brown, G., Berchick, R.J., Stewart, B.L., & Steer, R.A. (1990). Relationship between hopelessness and ultimate suicide: A replication with psychiatric outpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 190–195.
Beck, A.T., & Steer, R.A. (1991). Manual for the Beck Scale for
Suicide Ideation. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corpo- ration.
Bonner, R.L., & Rich, A.R. (1987). Toward a predictive model of suicidal ideation and behavior – some preliminary data in col- lege students. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 17, 50–63.
Brissette, I., Scheier, M.F., & Carver, C.S. (2002). The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psycho- logical adjustment during a life transition. Journal of Person- ality and Social Psychology, 82, 102–111.
Carver, C.S., Pozo, C., Harris, S.D., Noriega, V., Scheier, M.F., Robinson, D.S. et al. (1993). How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 375–390.
Dube, S., Anda, R., Felitti, V., Chapman, D., Williamson, D., & Giles, W. (2001). Childhood abuse, household dysfunction, and the risk of attempted suicide throughout the life span: Find- ings from the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 3089.
Gillham, J., & Reivich, K. (2004). Cultivating optimism in child- hood and adolescence. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 146–163.
Gillham, J., Shatte, A., Reivich, K., & Seligman, M. (2001). Op- timism, pessimism, and explanatory style. In E. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 53–75). Washington, DC: American Psycho- logical Association.
Greenwald, R., & Rubin, A. (1999). Brief assessment of chil- dren’s posttraumatic symptoms: Development and preliminary validation of parent and child scales. Research on Social Work Practice, 9, 61–75.
Hawkins, M.T., & Miller, R.J. (2003). Cognitive vulnerability and resilience to depressed mood. Australian Journal of Psychol- ogy, 55, 176–183.
Hirsch, J.K., & Conner, K. (2006). Dispositional and explanatory style optimism as potential moderators of the relationship be- tween hopelessness and suicidal ideation. Suicide and Life- Threatening Behavior, 36, 661–669.
Hirsch, J.K., Duberstein, P., Conner, K., Heisel, M., Beckman, A., Franus, N. et al. (2006). Future orientation and suicide ideation and attempts in depressed adults ages 50 and over. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 752–757.
Irwin, H. (1999). Violent and nonviolent revictimization of wom- en abused in childhood. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1095–1110.
Johnson, J., Crofton, A., & Feinstein, S. (1996). Enhancing attri- butional style and positive life events predict increased hope- fulness among depressed psychiatric patients. Motivation and Emotion, 20, 285–297.
Kaplan, S.J., Pelcovitz, D., Salzinger, S., Mandel, F., & Weiner, M. (1997). Adolescent physical abuse and suicide attempts. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psy- chiatry, 36, 799–808.
Kaplan, S.J., Pelcovitz, D., Salzinger, S., Mandel, F., & Weiner, M. (1998). Adolescent physical abuse: Risk for adolescent psychiatric disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 954–959.
Keller, F., & Wolfersdorf, M. (1993). Hopelessness and the ten- dency to commit suicide in the context of depressive disorders. Crisis, 14, 173–177.
52 J.K. Hirsch et al.: Optimistic Explanatory Style
Crisis 2009; Vol. 30(1):48–53 © 2009 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers
Luten, A.G., Ralph, J.A., & Mineka, S. (1997). Pessimistic attri- butional style: Is it specific to depression versus anxiety versus negative affect? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 703–719.
Miller, D., Manne, S., Taylor, K., Keates, J., & Dougherty, J. (1996). Psychological distress and well-being in advanced cancer: The effects of optimism and coping. Journal of Clini- cal Psychology in Medical Settings, 3, 115–130.
Miller, J.S., Segal, D.L., & Coolidge, F.L. (2001). A comparison of suicidal thinking and reasons for living among younger and older adults. Death Studies, 25, 357–365.
Minkoff, K., Bergman, E., Beck, A.T., & Beck, R. (1973). Hope- lessness, depression, and attempted suicide. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 455–459.
National Center for Health Statistics (2004). Deaths: Final data for 2002. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Hu- man Services.
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (2005). Web- based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Peterson, C., Seligman, M., & Vaillant, G. (1988). Pessimistic explanatory style is a risk factor for physical illness: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- ogy, 55, 23–27.
Peterson, C., & Villanova, P. (1988). An expanded attributional style questionnaire. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(1), 87–89.
Puskar, K., Sereika, S., Lamb, J., Tusaie-Mumford, K., & McGui- ness, T. (1999). Optimism and its relationship to depression, coping, anger, and life events in rural adolescents. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 20, 115–130.
Reivich, K. (1995). The measurement of explanatory style. In G.M. Buchanan and M.E.P. Seligman (Editors), Explanatory style (pp. 21–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Scheier, M., & Carver, C. (1993). On the power of positive think- ing: The benefits of being optimistic. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 26–30.
Scheier, M.F., Carver, C.S., & Bridges, M.W. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and psychological well-being. In E.C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 189–216). Washington, DC: American Psy- chological Association.
Segerstrom, S.C. (2001). Optimism, goal conflict, and stressor- related immune change. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 441–467.
Segerstrom, S.C. (2005). Optimism and immunity: Do positive thoughts always lead to positive effects? Brain Behavior and Immunity, 19, 195–200.
Seligman, M., Abramson, L., Semmel, A., & Von Baeyer, C. (1984). Depressive attributional style. Southern Psychologist, 2, 18–22.
Seligman, M., Castellon, C., Cacciola, J., Schulman, P., Luborsky, L., Ollove, M. et al. (1988). Explanatory style change during cognitive therapy for unipolar depression. Journal of Abnor- mal Psychology, 97, 13–18.
Shatte, A., Gillham, J., & Reivich, K. (2000). Promoting hope in children and adolescents. In J. Gillham (Ed.), The science of
optimism and hope: Research essays in honor of Martin E.P. Seligman (pp. 215–234). Radnor, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
Stark, K., & Boswell, J. (2000). Discussion of the Penn Optimism Program: Recognizing its strengths and considerations for en- hancing the program. In J. Gillham (Ed.), The science of opti- mism and hope: Research essays in honor of Martin E.P. Selig- man. Laws of life symposia series (pp. 235–256). Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
Sulik, L.R., & Garfinkel, B. (1992), Adolescent suicidal behavior: Understanding the breadth of the problem. Child Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 1, 197–228.
Tedeschi, R.G., & Calhoun, L.G. (1996). The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 455–471.
US Public Health Service (1999). The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent suicide. Washington DC: Author.
Vaillant, G.E. (2003). Mental health. American Journal of Psy- chiatry, 160, 1373–1384.
Violanti, J. (2001). Posttraumatic stress disorder intervention in law enforcement: Differing perspectives. The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 2001–2002.
About the authors
Jameson K. Hirsch is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Laboratory of Rural Psychological and Physical Health, Depart- ment of Psychology, East Tennessee State University in Johnson City, TN, USA.
Karen Wolford is a professor of psychology and an expert on trauma and PTSD at SUNY College at Oswego, NY, USA.
Steven M. LaLonde is an associate professor and an expert in multivariate modeling and survey research at the Rochester Insti- tute of Technology, NY, USA.
Lisa Brunk is a practicing counselor in the Central Nassau Guid- ance and Counseling Services, NY, USA.
Amanda Parker-Morris is currently completing her graduate train- ing at the School of Professional Psychology, Pacific University, OR, USA.
Jameson K. Hirsch
Department of Psychology East Tennessee State University P.O. Box 70649 Johnson City, TN 37614 USA Tel. +1 423 439-4463 E-mail [email protected]
J.K. Hirsch et al.: Optimistic Explanatory Style 53
© 2009 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers Crisis 2009; Vol. 30(1):48–53