Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training II
cxa0cpq
OPS571_r8_LTA_Six_Sigma_Yellow_Belt_Training_II_Week5.doc|
Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training II Grading Guide OPS/571 Version 8 |
4 |
Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training II Grading Guide
OPS/571 Version 8
Operations Management
Copyright
Copyright © 2017, 2016, 2013 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.
Learning Team Assignment: Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training II
Purpose of Assignment
The purpose of this assignment is for students to receive Six Sigma Yellow Belt Training – Executing DMAIC Six Sigma Quality Improvement (Analyze, Improve and Control) projects.
Resources Required
Microsoft® PowerPoint®
|
Content |
Met |
Partially Met |
Not Met |
Comments: |
|
Used the same business your team chose and has been observing and collecting data for the Week 3 Learning Team Assignment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Executed the analyze phase of the Six Sigma DMAIC project. |
|
|
|
|
|
Determined the most likely causes of defects. |
|
|
|
|
|
Understood why defects are generated by identifying the key variables most likely to create process variation. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified necessary/unnecessary process steps. |
|
|
|
|
|
Executed the improve phase of the Six Sigma DMAIC project. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified means to remove the causes of defects. |
|
|
|
|
|
Confirmed the key variables and quantify their effects on the CTQs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified the maximum acceptance ranges of the key variables and a system for measuring deviations of the variables. |
|
|
|
|
|
Modified the process to stay within an acceptable range. |
|
|
|
|
|
Executed the Control phase of the Six Sigma DMAIC project. |
|
|
|
|
|
Determined how to maintain the improvements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Determined how to monitor and control improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put tools in place to ensure the key variables remained within the maximum acceptance ranges under the modified process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilized all analytical tools available for Six Sigma as permitted or appropriate. |
|
|
|
|
|
Developed a 10- to 15-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation (including talking points) highlighting your work on the three phases of the Six Sigma process improvement project. |
|
|
|
|
|
Format your assignment as you would be giving a presentation to senior management. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
5 |
#/5 |
|
|
Presentation Guidelines |
Met |
Partially Met |
Not Met |
Comments: |
|
The presentation is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, font sizes, and white space. |
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. |
|
|
|
|
|
The presentation includes an introduction and conclusion that preview and review major points. |
|
|
|
|
|
Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|
|
|
|
2 |
#/2 |
|
|
Assignment Total |
# |
7 |
#/7 |
|
|
Additional comments:
|
