The second basic form of evidence is identifying whether there is a misrepresentation or not. Misrepresentation in documents in numbers across different classes in the college in the excel and other worksheets saved in the computers will be also another piece of evidence to identify fraud on students’ tuition money in the college. One example is when they quote that a certain class has 150 students while in fact it has 100. This will mean that the financial statements issued by the accountants are false and adjusted in some reckless manner. The third basics of evidence is identifying any form of misleading information from the statements (Rita de La Feria, 2020). Any misleading information on the computations and data will indicate some evidence about the fraud activities and should be quickly obtained and transferred into an external material to be presented to the administration or resolution court. Reckless and deliberate omissions for some years or months will be identified from the financial statements as well. All these pieces of evidence will be transferred carefully without any omissions into an external storage device and then printed or transferred to another computer to prove how the accountants have been engaging in fraudulent operations.
Answer: thanks for your post. In reference to your statement below: Couldn't the discrepancy just be an error, not fraud? Also, why would you define the discrepancy as reckless?
One example is when they quote that a certain class has 150 students while in fact it has 100. This will mean that the financial statements issued by the accountants are false and adjusted in some reckless manner.