Homework Question

OL-667 Case Study Analysis Rubric You will be presented with four case studies during this 10-week course. These activities will allow you to apply the principles and concepts from your readings to workplace practice situations. These case studies will also require that you research information systems technology, understand how to conduct a needs assessment of the organization, select an appropriate HR information system (HRIS), and outline how to integrate the system effectively. Additionally, a large focus of the course is on the analysis, use, and protection of data in an HRIS. The goal of the four case studies is to provide the necessary skills for students to effectively research, integrate, and leverage various HR information systems for a variety of purposes in and beyond the course. Please review the evaluation criteria in the rubric that highlights grading information below. Guidelines for Submission: Case study analysis assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations (APA format). Page length requirements: 2–4 pages.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Case Study Synopsis Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides inferences to similar workplace scenarios

Describes key components of the case study in a concise summary

Describes some key components of the case study with gaps of missing information

Does not include key components of the case study OR summary is lengthy or incoherent

25

Case Analysis

Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides examples

Analyzes case study questions with details and explanations applying both technical and communicative proficiency

Analyzes case study questions with minor gaps in details and explanations; has difficulty in applying both technical and communicative proficiency

Does not provide in-depth analysis for the required case study questions

30

Conclusions Meets “Proficient” criteria and appraises compared to current workplace scenarios

Draws conclusions that are justified with evidence

Draws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidence

Does not draw logical conclusions

25

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

20

Total 100%