Final Project Paper
biggsandbayley
OL499SimProj-FinalProjectPlanRubric.docxOL499 Simulation Project – Challenge #1 (Rubric)
|
Grading Criteria |
Points Possible |
Exceeds Expectations/ Superior Work |
Meets Expectations/ Excellent |
Needs Work to Meet Full Expectations/ Fair |
Not Addressed/ Very Incomplete |
Points Earned |
|
Mechanics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling & Grammar |
10 |
|
10-9 No errors in spelling or grammar. |
8-7 A few to some spelling & grammar errors |
6-0 Numerous errors in grammar & spelling |
|
|
APA Formatted Paper (font, margins, line spacing, headers, and appendices) |
14 |
14-13 Formatting accurate, thorough, and complete |
12-11 Some formatting present but inconsistent across the entire paper. |
10-9 Little or incomplete formatting elements. |
8-0 No or serious omissions in APA formatting |
|
|
Supporting Sources with citations & References |
16 |
16-15 High quality/objective sources, APA formatted citations & references |
14-12 Some quality sources used but not all are objective. Limited formatting for citations & references |
11-9 Few sources used and/or citation & reference formatting incomplete |
8-0 Use of supporting sources largely incomplete or not provided |
|
|
Content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Characteristic Info: Division title & mission statement. Explanation of who, where, what, & when. |
40 |
40-36 Complete mission statement. Full list of characteristics with ample explanation and description. |
35-32 Mission statement partially complete. Some explanation and description of characteristics Provided. |
31-25 Brief mission statement. Uneven coverage or lack of clarity describing & explaining characteristics. |
25-0 Significant content missing or has significant misconceptions. Few or low quality supporting sources.
|
|
|
Explanatory Info: Provide complete logic, reasoning, and assumptions for characteristics |
40 |
40-36 Info presented develops clear logic and reasoning as with a full explanation. Clear support for arguments. |
35-32 Partial development of reasoning for explanations and descriptions. Some support for argument. |
31-25 Vague or inconsistent development of explanations. Arguments not developed or unclear. |
25-0 Significant content missing or has significant misconceptions. Few or low quality supporting sources.
|
|
|
Appendices: Provide Supporting info & documents that help explain arguments |
30 |
30-27 Ample supporting info and documentation. Clearly fit with characteristics and reasoning for arguments |
26-24 Sufficient documentation provided. Partial connection between documentation and reasoning. |
23-18 Insufficient or incomplete documentation. Weak connection to the reasoning behind arguments. |
18-0 Little or no documentation present. |
|
|
Total Points |
150 |
|
|
|||
|
Feedback Comments:
|
