OL-4.docx
For Leader Analysis Paper #4, please submit a 4-5 page (minimum) double-spaced paper that details the following:
1. Specifically, how did your leader display (or not display) aspects of Ethics and Professional Codes of Conduct (Unit 10), Managing Conflict (Unit 11), Strategic Planning (Unit 12) and Power and Politics (Unit 13). Please include citations and references to Units 10, 11, 12 and 13 reading materials that support your answers.
2. How can you apply the conclusions of your assessment and analysis to leadership roles and responsibilities in your organization?
Rubric
Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric
|
Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccurately described the leader's style, traits and/or behaviours.
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully described. No additional improvement is necessary.
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly described. Only minimal improvement is necessary.
|
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately described. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally described. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not accurately describe.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplied course material to what you learned about the leader.
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully applied. No improvement necessary
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly applied. Minimal improvement is necessary.
|
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately applied. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimallyapplied. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not apply course material.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsed citations from the week's reading materials.
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully cited course materials. No improvement is necessary.
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly cited course materials. Only minimal improvement necessary.
|
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately cited course materials. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally cited. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not cite appropriately.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrote with sufficient detail.
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully detailed. No further improvement is necessary.
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly detailed. Only minimal improvement is necessary.
|
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately detailed. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimal detail. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not provide sufficient detail.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsed appropriate grammar, punctuation and masters-level writing style
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully used appropriate writing style. No further improvements are necessary.
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly used appropriate writing style. Only minimal improvement necessary.
|
3 pts
Accceptable
Moderately used appropriate writing style. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally used appropriate writing style. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not use appropriate writing style.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 25
|
sunshine1234
