Discussion
Elements of Argument English 101C / Sherman
From Elements of Argument, 12th ed., Rottenberg and Winchell
Jaws poster art: Roger Kastel
Three Main Elements of Argument � Claim � The argument/thesis; an assertion that will need to be
proven � Can also refer to other statements/assertions that are
made within the main argument
� Support � Proof for the claim � Various forms of Evidence and Appeals
� Warrants � Any underlying assumptions in an argument � May be implied or stated outright
What is a Claim? � Statement of assertion; the idea or
proposed action being argued
� Generally refers to the thesis statement in an argument
� But can also be found throughout an argument, in assertions that are made as part of the overall argument, or as part of the conclusion in an argument
Three Types of Claims
� Claim of Fact
� Claim of Value
� Claim of Policy
Claim of Fact • Statement that something: • Is occurring/did occur/will occur • Or does exists/did exist/will exist • Can typically be verified by evidence • But can also take the form of: • A prediction • Or a statement asserting a cause/effect
relationship • Differs from a fact in that the arguer will
need to offer support to build an argument in favor of the claim/assertion
Examples – Claims of Fact
� Shark attacks have increased in the last three years off the coast of Sydney, Australia (Innis).
� The social behavior of sharks is being studied at a zoo in Sydney (Parker).
� The new shark exhibit is expected to bring in more visitors (Parker).
Don Emmert/AFP/Getty Images
Claim of Value
• A judgment or evaluation • An assertion that something is: • Good/better/best • Bad/worse/worst; • Ugly/beautiful • Wrong/right • Typically about either
values/beliefs/morals or aesthetics • Provides a set of subjective criteria to
evaluate something
Examples – Claims of Value
� Most conservationists believe it is more beneficial to the environment, and also more ethical, to catch and
release potentially dangerous sharks than to kill them
(Innis).
� Some sharks are friendly and also play an important role in ocean ecosystems (Innis).
� Tiger sharks are gentle and easy to work with (Innis).
� Environmentalists claim that it is wrong to interfere with shark populations (Innis).
� Some sharks have beautiful markings.
Divernet.com
Claim of Policy
• Statement proposing action • Usually includes �should,��must,� �ought to�
• Provides support to show the merits of taking the proposed course of action over other options
Examples – Claims of Policy
� The catch-and-kill shark culling policy should be stopped.
� Not all patrol boats should be used for hunting sharks.
� Authorities ought to find a new solution to the shark problem during beach season.
Support
� Proof for an argument/claim
� Two types:
� Evidence � Appeals
Evidence
� Facts
� Examples
� Statistics (facts in numeric form)
� Expert testimony
Examples of Facts � “Laeticia Brouwer, 17, was fatally attacked by
a shark while surfing in Western Australia last week” (Hubbard).
� “The latest attack prompted Australian Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg to resurface the idea of killing sharks” (Hubbard).
� “A drum line is a type of trap made up of a large baited hook attached to a floating object, which is then anchored to the seabed” (Hubbard).
NSW Department of Primary Industries
Examples of Examples
� Shark nets are seen by some as not only ineffective, but as harmful to other marine creatures, including
dolphins, turtles, and rays (Elst).
� Alternatives to shark culling include the use of drones, sonar, and electromagnetic fields to deter sharks
(Elst).
� People can take responsibility for their own safety by avoiding swimming in fishing zones, canals, and
harbour mouths, by not interfering with or swimming
near shark nets, and by keeping pets out of the water
(Elst).
The Northern Star
Examples of Statistics � “The state’s Fisheries Department has tagged 338
sharks with radio transponders and installed 320
monitors on the seabed” (Innis).
� “Before the last three years, there had been only 13 deaths in the past century” (Innis).
� “Tourism in the state…brings in about $7.5 billion a year” (Innis).
� “‘We have 31,000 followers who get tweets on surf conditions, which beaches are patrolled,’ and
occasionally, whether a shark has passed by” (Innis).
Mackenzie Price
Examples of Expert Testimony
� “Last week, the federal environment minister, Josh Frydenberg, accused Western Australia, the state where the last three fatal attacks occurred, of failing to respond to the
problem. ‘The commonwealth would welcome any proposal to
protect human life first and foremost,’ he said, suggesting
culling or other measures as the state saw fit” (Whitehead).
� “Vic Hislop, a former shark hunter from Queensland, called for the helicopter strike teams [to come in]…warning, ‘As
they continue to let the sharks escape after they eat
somebody, it’s going to get worse and worse. Make no
mistake’” (Whitehead).
� “But Western Australia denies that killing sharks would be productive. Last week, the state fisheries minister, Dave Kelly, said that culling did not ‘actually make our beaches any safer.’ And its premier, Mark McGowan, said people would
always face a very small risk of being attacked in the ocean,
calling it a ‘harsh reality’” (Whitehead).
Appeals � Appeals to Emotions � Pity, fear, hope, anger
� Ex: We need to keep our beaches safe, especially with the holiday weekend coming up. Children could be harmed.
� Appeals to Values � Democracy, fairness, cooperation, trust, family
� Ex: It’s important that we hear all sides before making a decision about how to protect beach-goers.
� Ex: We all want what’s best for our community.
� Appeals to Authority � Political leaders, religious leaders, experts
� Ex: Green Peace agrees with the catch and release policy.
Bradley Hunter
Warrants � Any underlying assumptions stated in the
argument
� Can be stated or implied
� Can be found throughout an argument, as an attempt to provide support
� Sometimes part of a larger idea on which an argument/claim relies (a larger premise or idea/belief behind the claim)
� Easiest to find when flawed/faulty
Types of Warrants • Motivational warrants � Assumptions about the shared values of the
audience � Ex: We all want safe beaches—no matter the cost.
• Substantive warrants � Assumptions about our acceptance of the evidence,
its accuracy, or whether it is sufficient, representative, or current � Ex: This year’s attacks show there’s a need for
culling. • Authoritative warrants � Assumptions about our acceptance of the credibility
and authority of expert testimony or a source of evidence � Ex: Australia’s environmental minister supports
culling.
Hermanus Backpackers
Language & Tone � Humorous, ironic, or sarcastic
� Irreverent, casual, or formal � Biased/subjective vs. neutral/objective
� Exaggerated
� Vivid, descriptive, memorable, detailed
� Qualifiers Some, might, most, may, in some cases,
sometimes, could, perhaps, possibly (Qualifiers can help make a statement more accurate.
� Ex: Culling is one possible solution. � Ex: There could be other ways to deter sharks. � Ex: It’s unlikely that we’ll be able to find a perfect solution.
Tumblr.com
Logical Fallacies
� Flaws/Holes in the argument
� Unfounded/inaccurate assumptions
� May be found throughout an argument
Examples of Types of Flaws/Fallacies
• Jumping to conclusions • Unfounded/inaccurate generalizations
(stereotyping) • Either/or conclusions (black/white) • Unfounded appeal to tradition/history • Manipulation of audience�s emotions • Unequal comparisons/problematic
analogies
Examples of Flawed Statements � Hunting and killing sharks is the only way to keep
beach-goers safe.
� Everyone supports the increased culling of sharks in Western Australia.
� Opponents to the new shark culling policy will never win this battle.
� We either have to reduce shark populations, or people are going to die in vast numbers.
� All sharks are killers.
� It’s a bloodbath out there! Children’s lives are at stake!
Getty Images
Additional Elements
� Background Information/History � A form of support/evidence
� Definition of Key Terms � A form of support/evidence
� Establishing Common Ground � A form of support; usually an appeal
Additional Elements, contd. � Opposing Viewpoint/Counter-Argument
and Rebuttal � Organizational structure in which claims and counter-
arguments are provided � Can include evidence and/or appeals � Can strengthen the argument by acknowledging the
consideration of the opposing view; can help establish credibility of the arguer
� Concession � An attempt to acknowledge, or agree with, part of the
opposing viewpoint, ultimately to strengthen one�s own position/argument/point of view
� Can sometimes include an appeal
Works Cited
Elst, Alix Foster Vander. “Top 5 Alternatives to Shark Nets,” Greenpeace, 16 Dec. 2016.
Hubbard, Chloe. “No Shark Cull…,” NBC News, 30 April 2017.
Innis, Michelle. “Australia Catch-and-Kill Shark Policy…,” New York Times, 3 Feb 2014.
Parker, Laura. “Studying Sharks’ Social Lives…,” New York Times, 11 Jan. 2016.
Whitehead, Eleanor. “A Surfer is Killed,” New York Times, 25 April 2017.