Nursing Theories, Conceptual Models and Philosophies

- Official Presentations Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40 to >36.0 ptsExcellent100% of the presentation (live or recorded) aligns with the information requested and shows complete mastery of the topic or task by providing comprehensive information, details, and examples.

36 to >32.0 ptsGoodMost of the presentation (live or recorded) aligns with the information requested and shows complete mastery of the topic or task by providing comprehensive information, details, and examples.

32 to >28.0 ptsFairSome of the presentation (live or recorded) aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the topic or task by providing comprehensive information, details, and examples.

28 to >24.0 ptsPoorMost of the presentation (live or recorded) does not align with the information requested. It shows incomplete mastery of the topic or task by providing limited or poor information, details, and examples.

24 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication

Oral Presentation, Recorded Narrative, or Scripted Notes

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentOral presentation (live or recorded) is fluid, free of grammatical errors, and well paced. The message is transmitted flawlessly, and the audience is captivated and able to follow the presentation step by step. OR (for non-presented assignments) Script for presentation in the notes is exceptional, effectively tells the story, or communicates key points from the slide.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodOral presentation (live or recorded) has a few grammatical errors or pacing issues. Issues do not interfere with reception of the content. OR (for non-presented assignments) Script for presentation in the notes effectively tells the story or communicates key points from the slide.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairOral presentation has significant grammatical issues, interfering with the reception of the content OR (for non-presented assignments). Script for presentation reiterates the content on the slide without any additional information. If this was presented, it would appear that the presenter was reading the slides to the audience. OR (for non-presented assignments) Script for presentation in the notes fairly tell the story or communicates basic key points from the slide.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorPresentation is very difficult to understand, either as the result of the presentation or technological issues causing interference OR (for non-presented assignments) the script for the presentation in the notes appears to be unrelated to the content on the slide.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Materials and Visual Presentation

30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentPresentation has a highly professional, appealing appearance. Supporting visuals may include images, graphs, or charts and are exceptional and appropriate to the message being presented. Slides are well formatted with the proper amount of text, leveraging heading and body styles. The colors and style are consistent throughout. The visuals and the oral message are well-balanced.

27 to >24.0 ptsGoodPresentation has a professional appearance. Supporting visuals are appropriate to the message being presented. Slides are well formatted with appropriate graphics and font size. The colors and style are consistent throughout.

24 to >21.0 ptsFairPresentation has a professional appearance. Supporting visuals are appropriate to the message being presented. There are some inconsistencies with formatting, colors, and style, but the overall presentation is developing and looks fair.

21 to >18.0 ptsPoorSlides have some severe issues with inconsistent or unnecessary graphics or too much text on the slides. The visuals are overall appropriate to the message being presented.

18 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics and Grammar

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentSlides are entirely free of typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, translation or formatting errors.

9 to >8.0 ptsGoodSlides have minimal (1 - 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 ptsFairSlides have multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 ptsPoorSlides have more than severe (8-10) typos, spelling, grammar or translation issues. (A presentation will distract from the message if these issues are present.

6 to >0 ptsUnacceptableSlides are unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts