DNP-NURS 6-7
Mechy19
NURSING6Y7.docx
EACH ASSIGNMENT MUST BE DONE IN A SEPARATELY WORD DOCUMENT.
PLEASE WHEN POSTED IDENTIFY EACH ONE ACCORDING THE MODULE TO BE ABLE TO KNOW
MODULE 6 ASSIGNMENT 1
Instructions:
Create a comparative table with the differences between formal and informal organizational structures. Exemplify each of the differences described.
Submission Instructions:
1 PAGE
Your assignment should be formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least three academic sources within the past 5 years.
Review the rubric below to determine how your assignment will be graded.
Your assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism. Please be less than 10% of plagio or AI text
Rubric
- Official Assignment Rubric
- Official Assignment Rubric
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Professionalism Concept Application |
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar Written Communication |
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Minimal (1 - 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor Severe (8 - 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication Specific Formatting |
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The assignment meets 90 % - 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical and Logical Thinking Thought analysis process |
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Academic Literacy Quality of Sources and APA Citations |
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
20 pts |
Total Points: 100
MODULE 7 ASSIGNMENT 1
Instructions:
In your final project, you will have the possibility to describe, in an essay, emotional competence as a required leadership skill necessary for today’s leader. You may define in this paper what emotional competence is. How can it affect the leader’s decision during a crisis impacting others? Also, when the leader’s feelings and emotions must be considered, emphasizing the concepts of self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills? Illustrate this paper with samples or a case study.
Contribute a minimum of 3 pages. It should include at least five academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
Your assignment should be formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least three academic sources within the past 5 years.
Review the rubric below to determine how your assignment will be graded.
Your assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism. Please be less than 10% of plagio or AI text
RUBRIC
- Official Essay Rubric
- Official Essay Rubric
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Mastery of the Information |
30 to >27.0 pts Excellent The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples. 27 to >24.0 pts Good The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples. 24 to >21.0 pts Fair The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples. 21 to >18.0 pts Poor The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts. 18 to >0 pts Unacceptable The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
30 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization Structure of the Essay |
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking Development of Ideas |
15 to >14.0 pts Excellent Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained. 14 to >12.0 pts Good (12 -11 pts) Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained. 12 to >11.0 pts Fair Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information. 11 to >9.0 pts Poor Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made. 9 to >0 pts Unacceptable The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Information Literacy Quality of Resources |
15 to >14.0 pts Excellent Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. 14 to >12.0 pts Good Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. 12 to >11.0 pts Fair Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. 11 to >9.0 pts Poor The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. 9 to >0 pts Unacceptable Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Mechanics and Grammar |
10 to >9.0 pts Excellent Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. 9 to >8.0 pts Good Minimal (1 - 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 8 to >7.0 pts Fair Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 7 to >5.0 pts Poor Severe (8 - 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 5 to >0 pts Unacceptable Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Formatting and APA Guidelines |
10 to >9.0 pts Excellent The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting. 9 to >8.0 pts Good The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references. 8 to >6.0 pts Fair The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references. 6 to >5.0 pts Poor The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references. 5 to >0 pts Unacceptable APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
10 pts |
Total Points: 100
