COMPETENCY POWERPOINT
Nurses fatigue alarm management
Introduction Alarm fatigue can have adverse consequences to patient’s health and safety Nurses have to balance between caregiving and responding to numerous alarms, including non-actionable alarms Nurses in intensive care units (ICU) spend 35% of their working time monitoring and responding to alarms (López et al., 2022). The burden of responding to numerous irrelevant or false alarms leads to errors, alarm apathy, burnout and stress among nurses Prevalence of alarm fatigue can lead to complacency and alarm-related adverse events
Introduction Cont’d Alarm fatigue is a systematic medical issue and requires human, organizational and technical interventions Implementing new policies and strategies to improve alarm fatigue can increase alarm response and enhance patient care Many clinical facilities still lack practical and concrete strategies to address alarm-related issues There is still a knowledge gap between alarm-related standards and how the standards translate to practice.
Research Methodology Qualitative study – descriptive phenomenological approach of Giorgi Purposeful sampling Involved 17 nurses working in ICU Semi-structured interviews for data collection Data analysis – Giorgi’s phenomenological method Atlas.ti version 8.0 program for data analysis
Research Findings Nurses considered monitors to be utility devices and add extra work All participants agreed that alarm and electronic devices were basic unit requirements Monitors have increasingly become complex and frequently cause problems such as stress There is continuous, stressful and annoying background noise from alarms in facility settings Teamwork among nurses was essential in responding to alarms There is need for advanced knowledge and specialized training in monitor surveillance (López et al., 2022).
InterventionsTraining in the configuration of monitors and new improvementsCustomization of alarms to the patient’s conditions Teamwork in responding to alarmsImplementing modern technologies like clinical decision support systems (CDSS)Providing systems with automated feedback and learning mechanisms (López et al., 2022).
ReferenceLópez, E. F., Rodríguez, M. B., Lavado García, J., Toribio, F. R., Amarilla, D. F. J., Rodríguez Almagro, J. J., Ribeiro, A. S. F., Fernandes, V. S., & Moran, G. J. M. (2022). Experiences and mediating factors in nurses’ responses to electronic device alarms: A phenomenological study. Journal of Nursing Management (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 30(5), 1303–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13614
intoduction
Alarm fatigue can have adverse consequences to patient’s health
and safety
Nurses have to balance between caregiving and responding to
numerous alarms, including non-actionable alarms
Nurses in intensive care units (ICU) spend 35% of their working
time monitoring and responding to alarms (López et al., 2022).
The burden of responding to numerous irrelevant or false alarms
leads to errors, alarm apathy, burnout and stress among nurses
Prevalence of alarm fatigue can lead to complacency and alarm-
related adverse events
Alarm fatigue can have adverse consequences to patient’s health and safety Nurses have to balance between caregiving and responding to numerous alarms, including non-actionable alarms Nurses in intensive care units (ICU) spend 35% of their working time monitoring and responding to alarms (López et al., 2022). The burden of responding to numerous irrelevant or false alarms leads to errors, alarm apathy, burnout and stress among nurses Prevalence of alarm fatigue can lead to complacency and alarm-related adverse events
Introduction contd
Alarm fatigue is a systematic medical issue and
requires human, organizational and technical
interventions
Implementing new policies and strategies to
improve alarm fatigue can increase alarm
response and enhance patient care
Many clinical facilities still lack practical and
concrete strategies to address alarm-related issues
There is still a knowledge gap between alarm-
related standards and how the standards translate
to practice.
Research methodology
Qualitative study – descriptive phenomenological approach of Giorgi
Purposeful sampling
Involved 17 nurses working in ICU
Semi-structured interviews for data collection
Data analysis – Giorgi’s phenomenological method
Atlas.ti version 8.0 program for data analysis
Research findings
Nurses considered monitors to be utility devices and add extra work
All participants agreed that alarm and electronic devices were basic unit
requirements
Monitors have increasingly become complex and frequently cause
problems such as stress
There is continuous, stressful and annoying background noise from alarms
in facility settings
Teamwork among nurses was essential in responding to alarms
There is need for advanced knowledge and specialized training in monitor
surveillance (López et al., 2022).
interventions
Training in the configuration of monitors and new improvements
Customization of alarms to the patient’s conditions
Teamwork in responding to alarms
Implementing modern technologies like clinical decision support
systems (CDSS)
Providing systems with automated feedback and learning mechanisms
(López et al., 2022).
references
López, E. F., Rodríguez, M. B., Lavado García, J., Toribio, F. R., Amarilla, D. F. J., Rodríguez Almagro, J. J., Ribeiro, A. S. F., Fernandes, V. S., & Moran, G. J. M. (2022). Experiences and mediating factors in nurses’ responses to electronic device alarms: A phenomenological study. Journal of Nursing Management (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 30(5), 1303–1316.