Assignment: Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.	Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the diagnosis for the patient, including an accurate and thorough rationale for the diagnosis that supports clinical judgment. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides a basic explanation of 1-2 diagnoses for the patient, including an accurate rationale for the diagnosis that may support clinical judgment. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate or vague rationale for the diagnosis that may or may not support clinical judgment. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate and vague rationale for the diagnosis that does not support clinical judgment, or is missing. Feedback:
Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.	Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and completely describes in detail an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response describes a basic explanation of the appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response inaccurately or vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response inaccurately and vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed. Feedback:
Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.	Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and detailed justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. The response includes specific, accurate, and detailed examples that fully support the justification provided. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides a basic justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. The response includes only 1-2 examples that fully support the justification provided. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides an inaccurate or vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. The response may include examples, which may inaccurately or vaguely support the justification provided. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides an inaccurate and vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient, or is missing. The response does not include examples that support the justification provided, or is missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) APA format errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the diagnosis for the patient, including an accurate and thorough rationale for the diagnosis that supports clinical judgment. Good 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides a basic explanation of 1-2 diagnoses for the patient, including an accurate rationale for the diagnosis that may support clinical judgment. Fair 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate or vague rationale for the diagnosis that may or may not support clinical judgment. Poor 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate and vague rationale for the diagnosis that does not support clinical judgment, or is missing. Feedback:

Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response accurately and completely describes in detail an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response describes a basic explanation of the appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response inaccurately or vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response inaccurately and vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed. Feedback:

Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and detailed justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. The response includes specific, accurate, and detailed examples that fully support the justification provided. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides a basic justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. The response includes only 1-2 examples that fully support the justification provided. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides an inaccurate or vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. The response may include examples, which may inaccurately or vaguely support the justification provided. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides an inaccurate and vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient, or is missing. The response does not include examples that support the justification provided, or is missing. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) APA format errors Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric