Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies
Catherine2
NURS6053WEEK6RUBRICDETAILS.htmlRubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6053_Module03_Week06_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following: · A description of your core values. · A personal mission/vision statement. | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail a set of core values. The response accurately and completely describes in detail a personal mission/vision statement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The response describes a set of core values. The response describes a personal mission/vision statement. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The response describes a set of core values that is vague or inaccurate. The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague or inaccurate. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The response describes a set of core values that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Feedback: |
| · Analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile. · A description of two key behaviors you wish to strengthen. | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response accurately and completely provides an analysis and detailed summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail two key behaviors to strengthen. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The response accurately provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment. The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague or inaccurate. The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague or inaccurate. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Feedback: |
| · A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples. | Points: Points Range: 50 (50%) - 55 (55%) An accurate, complete, and detailed development plan is provided that thoroughly explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected. The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail plans on how to achieve a personal vision with specific and accurate examples. The response includes a comprehensive synthesis of information gleaned from sources that fully support how to achieve a personal vision. Integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2 or 3 course-specific resources to fully support the responses provided. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 44 (44%) - 49 (49%) An accurate development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected. The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some specific examples. The response includes a synthesis of information gleaned from sources that may support how to achieve a personal vision. Integrates 1 credible outside source, in addition to 2 or 3 course-specific resources which may support the responses provided. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 39 (39%) - 43 (43%) A development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some examples that are vague or inaccurate. The response includes information gleaned from 2 or 3 sources that may support how to achieve a personal vision. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 38 (38%) A development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision that is vague and inaccurate, does not include any examples, or is missing. The response does not include any additional information gleaned from outside sources, or is missing. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: |
Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following: · A description of your core values. · A personal mission/vision statement.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail a set of core values. The response accurately and completely describes in detail a personal mission/vision statement. Good 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The response describes a set of core values. The response describes a personal mission/vision statement. Fair 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The response describes a set of core values that is vague or inaccurate. The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague or inaccurate. Poor 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The response describes a set of core values that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Feedback:· Analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile. · A description of two key behaviors you wish to strengthen.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response accurately and completely provides an analysis and detailed summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail two key behaviors to strengthen. Good 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The response accurately provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment. The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen. Fair 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague or inaccurate. The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague or inaccurate. Poor 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Feedback:· A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 50 (50%) - 55 (55%) An accurate, complete, and detailed development plan is provided that thoroughly explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected. The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail plans on how to achieve a personal vision with specific and accurate examples. The response includes a comprehensive synthesis of information gleaned from sources that fully support how to achieve a personal vision. Integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2 or 3 course-specific resources to fully support the responses provided. Good 44 (44%) - 49 (49%) An accurate development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected. The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some specific examples. The response includes a synthesis of information gleaned from sources that may support how to achieve a personal vision. Integrates 1 credible outside source, in addition to 2 or 3 course-specific resources which may support the responses provided. Fair 39 (39%) - 43 (43%) A development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some examples that are vague or inaccurate. The response includes information gleaned from 2 or 3 sources that may support how to achieve a personal vision. Poor 0 (0%) - 38 (38%) A development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision that is vague and inaccurate, does not include any examples, or is missing. The response does not include any additional information gleaned from outside sources, or is missing. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback:| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Name: NURS_6053_Module03_Week06_Assignment_Rubric
