Microeconomics analysis 1300words

This rubric is to be referred to when completing your project. Your feedback / marks will be provided online through blackboard.

Criteria

Excellent

Very good

Satisfactory

Developing

Not addressed

Title of Audit

with summary of the literature

15

Presents a multifaceted account of the audit, concise and comprehensive, states intention of main body of work and relevance/importance to the hospital setting

12.5

A comprehensive introduction to the project, states main intention of the body of work and relevance to the hospital setting

10

A clear introduction to the project which could be more detailed and/or more succinct, links to the main intention of the body of work and relevance to the hospital setting

5

Limited overview of the topic, provides enough information to know what the project is about, limited link to the hospital setting

0

Does not provide an introduction/summary and/or limited relevance to the hospital setting

Topic

Aim

Objectives

Rationale

Nursing Practice

Standard

Data Collection Method

Audit tool

15

Uses SMART Objectives

Sets realistic aims

Comprehensive Rationale

Recommended Tool

Data collection method accurate

Excellent standard

7.5

12.5

Uses SMART Objectives

Sets realistic aims

Comprehensive Rationale

Recommended Tool

Data collection method accurate

High Standard

10

Uses SMART Objectives

Sets realistic aims

Comprehensive Rationale

Recommended Tool

Data collection method accurate

Some areas require clarification

5

Uses SMART Objectives

Sets realistic aims

Comprehensive Rationale

Recommended Tool

Data collection method accurate

All areas require clarification

0

A very limited audit is presented and is disconnected from the literature

Analysis method

and reporting of data

10

Identifies analysis statistics

Excellent standard of reporting described

7.5

Identifies analysis statistics

High standard of reporting described

5

Identifies analysis statistics

Some areas reporting described need further explanation

2.5

Identifies analysis statistics

All areas require further explanation

0

None or a very limited number of reasons identified

Disseminate findings

Recommendation for change

Time frame for next audit

10

Produces a comprehensive and cohesive dissemination process which is creative and rational, detailing the anticipated recommendations for change

7.5

Differentiates the dissemination process to include a reasoned set of criteria that link with the recommendations and audit timeframe

5

Identifies a dissemination process that recognizes a limited number of links to the project, but falls short of being comprehensive.

Identifies some anticipated changes

2.5

The dissemination process reproduces an existing approach with limited evidence of being connected to the recommendations and/or details of the audit time frame

0

Limited or no evaluation identified and/or no anticipated benefits or recommendations made.

Overall structure and presentation of work

5

Excellently presented, clear organization and flow.

4

Well presented, clear organization and flow.

3

Satisfactory - clear organization and flow.

2

Some structure to work although could have been organized in a clearer way for the work to flow

1

Attention to organization and structure of work required

Referencing according to APA guidelines

5

Excellent Number, quality & compliance with APA referencing guide. Evidence of a wide range of current reading that includes a variety of resources (journals, textbooks, credible websites).

Literature published within the last 7-10 years.

4

Very good in all areas of this section although could be enhanced further

3

Satisfactory range although could be enhanced – very occasional error

2

Limited range and/or some areas require attention

1

Minimal use of evidence/some elements require major attention