Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Papernuddwdmb68
Running head: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE AND ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS 1
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE AND ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS 6
Comment by general data: Update title page and all page headings to APA 7
Evidence-Based Practice and Organizational Readiness
Grand Canyon University: NUR 590
For this paper, the selected survey tool for assessing organizational culture and readiness for implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) is the Organization Culture and Readiness for System-Wide Integration of Evidence-Based Practice (OCRSYWI). The role of this tool is to aid in the investigation, evaluation, and to determine if the organization is ready for the implementation of evidence-based practice. Comment by general data: Add heading per APA Nice purpose. Nice analysis of your organizations results of the survey evaluating their readiness level, possible project barriers and facilitators, and how to integrate clinical inquiry, and strategies that strengthen this organization's weaker areas.Great rationale for the survey category scores explaining the significantly high and low areas. Nice details and examples to better understand how to integrate clinical inquiry into this organization.Nice work refining your PICOT into a proposal or problem statement.Great summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations.Try to refine your content to be very direct have around 250 words for section A and 500-750 for section B.
Organization's Readiness Level
The process of investigation revealed several issues about the readiness of the organization for the implementation of evidence-based practice. One is that nurses are demonstrated and promised to fully participate in the process of implementation of this practice. Also, the physicians and other allied healthcare providers promised to support the nursing staff in the process of implementing evidence-based practice. The availability of the research department is another evidence of the readiness of the organization to implement the evidence-based practice. In this department are nurses working in partnership with regional and national research institutes. The research personnel, therefore, aid the nursing staff in the translation of research findings to practice. Finally, the organization has an EBP mentoring program that is tasked to train and motivate nurses to take the responsibility of implementing the evidence-based practice.
Barriers. Comment by general data: No . per APA level one heading
Several barriers have been identified to hinder the process of implementing evidence-based practice. They are both human and institutional factors. One of the barriers is the lack of adequate time to go through the available literature from research. This is attributed to nursing shortages which leads to too much workload on available nursing staff. Another barrier is the inadequate experience by nurses on the evidence-based practice due to limited training on the same (Duncombe, 2018). Lastly, the lack of adequate resources for some procedures to be done is a significant barrier to the implementation of EBP.
Among the facilitators of implementation of evidence-based practice includes the readiness of the nursing staff and other healthcare providers to receive training on the process of implementing EBP. Also, the willingness of the healthcare organization to support the whole process of implementing evidence-based practice in the management of diabetes type 2 among people with lower socioeconomic status is a facilitating factor. This is important as it ensures that the implementers have all the necessary resources to achieve the desired outcomes (Duncombe, 2018).
Diabetes mellitus type 2 is one of the common chronic diseases in the current society. The majority of the people affected by this disease are those from the lower socioeconomic status. Diabetes mellitus type 2 is considered a lifestyle condition. As a result, its prevalence is high among people of lower socioeconomic status due to barriers that hinder them from accessing quality health care services (Xu et al., 2018). These barriers are both social and physical determinants of health. These are the factors that affect where how people live, grow, interact, and even die. They include housing, availability of food, access to healthcare, level of education, and nutritional practices (Walker, Williams & Egede, 2016). These factors are experienced differently by people. As a result, there are disparities in health and its outcomes among the people. These disparities are high among the people of low socioeconomic status and suffering from diabetes mellitus type 2. Therefore, providing quality and equal healthcare service to the people is essential in reducing the disparities observed among these people as far as diabetes mellitus type 2 is concerned. This is essential in the achievement of the goals of healthy people 2020.
Research Summary and Literature Review.
According to research, there are significant health disparities related to diabetes in America. The disparities are associated with different social and physical disparities of health. These are the factors that affect the health and the outcomes of health among the people. The factors that determine health are systemic, societal, and individual in nature. Systemic factors are those that are related to the healthcare system. These include a lack of adequate resources, or policies and a shortage of healthcare providers. The healthcare system is not adequately funded to provide adequate preventive care to the people of America (Ong et al., 2018). As a result, individuals are being diagnosed with diabetes which could have been prevented. Availability of adequate resources ensures that community healthcare workers are able to provide preventive and health promotional services to the people regarding diabetes. This is likely to impact people with low socioeconomic status at risk of developing diabetes. For those who already have the disease, the provision of health promotional services help to prevent complications from arising.
Lack of adequate healthcare providers such as nurses and physician is another important factor that contributes to poor health outcomes among people of low socioeconomic status with diabetes (Ong et al., 2018). This is because the majority of the case is diagnosed late when the disease has already advanced to critical stages. Without adequate nurses and doctors, such patients are likely to receive low-quality care. Poor healthcare policies are associated with disorganized healthcare delivery. As a result individuals of the low socioeconomic class are likely to be discriminated against by the healthcare system hence resulting in poor delivery and access to healthcare.
Societal factors include those that affect the structure and nature of healthcare delivery. They include the geographical location of individuals and the healthcare facilities. The majority of the people of low socioeconomic class live in remote or slum areas. Healthcare facilities are not usually present in these areas. As a result, people have to move a long distance in search of healthcare services (Hill-Briggs et al., 2020). For conditions such as diabetes mellitus, any delay in intervention could result in devastating health outcomes for the people.
Individual factors that influence the incidence and prevalence of diabetes among the individual with low socioeconomic status are dietary practices and sedentary lifestyle. Due to lack of adequate finance, these individuals usually feed on unhealthy food that increases the likelihood of developing or complicating diabetes (Butler, 2017). A sedentary lifestyle such as lack of physical activity is another factor that contributes to the high prevalence of diabetes among the identified group. Therefore, evidence-based practice plays an essential role in the prevention and appropriate management of diabetes among such people in America today.
Butler, A. M. (2017). Social determinants of health and racial/ethnic disparities in type 2 diabetes in youth. Current diabetes reports, 17(8), 60.
Duncombe, D. C. (2018). A multi‐institutional study of the perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence‐based practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(5-6), 1216-1226.
Hill-Briggs, F., Adler, N. E., Berkowitz, S. A., Chin, M. H., Gary-Webb, T. L., Navas-Acien, A., ... & Haire-Joshu, D. (2020). Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review. Diabetes Care.
Ong, S. E., Koh, J. J. K., Toh, S. A. E. S., Chia, K. S., Balabanova, D., McKee, M., ... & Legido-Quigley, H. (2018). Assessing the influence of health systems on type 2 diabetes mellitus awareness, treatment, adherence, and control: a systematic review. PloS one, 13(3), e0195086.
Walker, R. J., Williams, J. S., & Egede, L. E. (2016). Influence of race, ethnicity and social determinants of health on diabetes outcomes. The American journal of the medical sciences, 351(4), 366-373.
Xu, G., Liu, B., Sun, Y., Du, Y., Snetselaar, L. G., Hu, F. B., & Bao, W. (2018). Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among US adults in 2016 and 2017: population based study. Bmj, 362, k1497.