Final Project Milestone Two: Topic Analysis

NUR 305 Final Project Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

For Milestone Two of your final project, you will analyze your chosen information technology and management strategy. Your submission for this step must address the following elements:

A. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using your chosen topic. B. Identify any legal and ethical implications associated with the use of your chosen topic, being sure to provide specific examples from research. If you

feel there are none, be sure to justify your conclusion. C. Explain how your chosen topic might need to be adapted for use with vulnerable populations. If you feel there is no need for adaptation, be sure to

defend your position with specific examples. D. Be sure to support your analysis with cited sources.

Guidelines for Submission: Your analysis of your chosen information technology and management strategy should be a minimum of 1–2 pages. Formatting should be 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, and one-inch margins. References and in-text citations should use proper APA formatting.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (88%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Advantages and Disadvantages

Meets “Proficient” criteria and articulation is exceptionally clear and well informed

Discusses advantages and disadvantages of using chosen topic, and uses scholarly research to support position

Discusses advantages and disadvantages of using chosen topic, but does not support position, or research used to support position is not scholarly

Does not discuss advantages and disadvantages of using chosen topic

22

Legal Implications Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the legal implications associated with use of the chosen topic

Accurately identifies legal implications associated with use of the chosen topic and provides specific examples, or justifies position if there are no implications

Identifies legal implications, but they are not associated with use of the chosen topic, or does not provide specific examples, or does not justify position if there are no implications

Does not identify legal implications associated with use of the chosen topic

22

Ethical Implications Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the ethical implications associated with use of the chosen topic

Accurately identifies ethical implications associated with use of the chosen topic, and provides specific examples, or justifies position if there are no implications

Identifies ethical implications, but they are not associated with use of the chosen topic, or does not provide specific examples, or does not justify position if there are no implications

Does not identify ethical implications associated with use of the chosen topic

22

Adaptation for Vulnerable Populations

Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the plight of vulnerable populations with regard to healthcare

Explains how chosen topic might need to be appropriately adapted for use with vulnerable populations, or defends position with specific examples if no need for adaptation

Explains how chosen topic might need to be adapted, but is not appropriate for use with vulnerable populations, or does not defend position if no need for adaptation

Does not explain how chosen topic might need to be adapted for use with vulnerable populations

22

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

12

Total 100%