APA

Benchmark - Personal Worldview Paper - Rubric

Personal Model of Leadership 12 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 12 points

A description of the personal model of leadership is extremely thorough and

includes substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.04 points

A description of the personal model of leadership is complete and includes

supporting details.

3. Approaching 10.56 points

A description of the personal model of leadership is included but lacks supporting

details.

2. Insufficient 9.6 points

A description of the personal model of leadership is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Leadership Model Comparison 8 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 8 points

A comparison of personal leadership style to servant leadership, transformational

leadership, and at least one other leadership style is thorough and includes

substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable 7.36 points

A comparison of personal leadership style to servant leadership, transformational

leadership, and at least one other leadership style is complete and includes

relevant supporting details.

3. Approaching 7.04 points

Collapse All

A comparison of personal leadership style to servant leadership, transformational

leadership, and at least one other leadership style is included but lacks relevant

supporting details.

2. Insufficient 6.4 points

A comparison of personal leadership style to servant leadership, transformational

leadership, and at least one other leadership style is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Diverse Teams and Interdisciplinary Collaboration B 8 points

Criteria Description

(C6.3)

5. Target 8 points

A description of at least two strategies for effectively leading diverse teams and

fostering interdisciplinary collaboration as one implements the leadership project is

thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable 7.36 points

A description of at least two strategies for effectively leading diverse teams and

fostering interdisciplinary collaboration as one implements the leadership project is

complete and includes relevant supporting details.

3. Approaching 7.04 points

A description of at least two strategies for effectively leading diverse teams and

fostering interdisciplinary collaboration as one implements the leadership project is

included but lacks relevant supporting details.

2. Insufficient 6.4 points

A description of at least two strategies for effectively leading diverse teams and

fostering interdisciplinary collaboration as one implements the leadership project is

incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Personal Leadership Models and Strategies 8 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 8 points

An explanation of how personal leadership models prepares one to employ

selected strategies is thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable 7.36 points

An explanation of how personal leadership models prepares one to employ

selected strategies is complete and includes relevant supporting details.

3. Approaching 7.04 points

An explanation of how personal leadership models prepares one to employ

selected strategies is included but lacks relevant supporting details.

2. Insufficient 6.4 points

An explanation of how personal leadership models prepares one to employ

selected strategies is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Personal Worldview 8 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 8 points

A description of how personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of

practice is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail, including religious,

spiritual, and cultural elements.

4. Acceptable 7.36 points

A description of how personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of

practice is complete and includes relevant supporting details.

3. Approaching 7.04 points

A description of how personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of

practice is included but lacks relevant supporting details.

2. Insufficient 6.4 points

A description of how personal worldview will influence the personal philosophy of

practice is incomplete or incorrect.

Personal Worldview and Leadership Style 0 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 0 points

A description of how your personal worldview influences your leadership style is

thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable 0 points

A description of how your personal worldview influences your leadership style is

thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

3. Approaching 0 points

A description of how your personal worldview influences your leadership style is

included but lacks relevant supporting details.

2. Insufficient 0 points

A description of how your personal worldview influences your leadership style is

incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Personal Worldview, Leadership, and Inspiration (B) 12 points

Criteria Description

(C6.7)

5. Target 12 points

A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is

extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.04 points

A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is

complete and includes supporting details.

3. Approaching 10.56 points

A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is

included but lacks supporting details.

2. Insufficient 9.6 points

A description of how the personal leadership behaviors can inspire others is

incomplete or incorrect.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 5.6 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 5.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 5.15 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching 4.93 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient 4.48 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 6.4 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 6.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout.

The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous

conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 5.89 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 5.63 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 5.12 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1 U ti f t 0 i t

Evidence 4 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 4 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives

are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable 3.68 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching 3.52 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient 3.2 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Mechanics of Writing 4 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 3.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 3.52 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

Format/Documentation 4 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of

direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable 3.68 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 3.52 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 3.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

Total 80 points