APA, format

Health Care Culture - Rubric

De�nition of Health Care Culture 11 points

Criteria Description

Definition of Health Care Culture

5. Target 11 points

A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of

safety, is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable 10.12 points

A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of

safety, is present and detailed.

3. Approaching 9.68 points

A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of

safety, is present.

2. Insufficient 8.8 points

A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of

safety is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety 12 points

Criteria Description

Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety

5. Target 12 points

Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of

safety are present and thorough. All examples are appropriate.

4. Acceptable 11.04 points

Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of

safety are present and detailed. Most examples are appropriate.

Collapse All

3. Approaching 10.56 points

Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of

safety are present. Some examples are appropriate.

2. Insufficient 9.6 points

Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of

safety are present, but lack details or are incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture 12 points

Criteria Description

Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture

5. Target 12 points

An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture

is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable 11.04 points

An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture

is present and detailed.

3. Approaching 10.56 points

An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture

is present.

2. Insufficient 9.6 points

An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture

is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used 12 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used by Health Care Organizations to

Improve Their Ethical Practices

5. Target 12 points

An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations

to improve ethical practices is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable 11.04 points

An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations

to improve ethical practices is present and detailed.

3. Approaching 10.56 points

An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations

to improve ethical practices is present.

2. Insufficient 9.6 points

An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations

to improve ethical practices is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work 12 points

Criteria Description

Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work at GCU Can Be

Implemented by Individuals to Improve Health Care Culture

5. Target 12 points

Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU

can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and

thorough.

4. Acceptable 11.04 points

Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU

can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and

detailed.

3. Approaching 10.56 points

Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU

can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present.

2. Insufficient 9.6 points

Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU

can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present, but

lack details or are incomplete.

Scholarly Sources 11 points

Criteria Description

Scholarly Sources

5. Target 11 points

A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources are

distinctive and address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

4. Acceptable 10.12 points

A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources address

all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

3. Approaching 9.68 points

A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present.

2. Insufficient 8.8 points

Two or three peer-reviewed, sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited

research is present.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are not present.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 6.44 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching 6.16 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient 5.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 8 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout.

The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous

conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 7.36 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 7.04 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 6.4 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence 5 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 5 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives

are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable 4.6 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching 4.4 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient 4 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Mechanics of Writing 5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 4.6 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.4 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

Format/Documentation 5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

5. Target 5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of

direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable 4.6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 4.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 4 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Total 100 points