unit 2 journal
Rubric Title: NU673 Units 2 and 8 PMHNP Journal Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points: 12 |
Level II Max Points: 9.6 |
Level I Max Points: 7.2 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Content of Paper |
· Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner · Develops content and theories are well · Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper · Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter · Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role · Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter · Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development · Presents content but is missing depth and or development · Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 2 |
Level III Max Points: 12 |
Level II Max Points: 9.6 |
Level I Max Points: 7.2 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning |
· Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content · Synthesizes information from scholarly resources · Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources · Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements · Supports content with at least one viewpoint. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks clarification or new information · Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight · Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points: 8 |
Level II Max Points: 6.4 |
Level I Max Points: 4.8 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Application of Knowledge |
· Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources · Applies practice that is accurate and plausible · Supports practice with additional scholarly resources · Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained · Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks objective criteria · Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content · Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points: 4 |
Level II Max Points: 3.2 |
Level I Max Points: 2.4 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Organization |
· Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument · Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas |
· Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement · Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow |
· Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content · Provides a purpose statement · Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 5
|
Level III Max Points: 4 |
Level II Max Points: 3.2 |
Level I Max Points: 2.4 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
College-level academic writing |
· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability |
· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
|
· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
40 |
32 |
24 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
33 points minimum |
25 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
Rubric Title: NU673 Units 4 and 9 Kaltura/Self-reflection Video Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Content Reflection
|
· Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. · Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples. · Answers all the questions in the self-reflection video prompt. |
· Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. · Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples. · Answers only part of the questions in the self-reflection video prompt. |
· Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments · Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples. · Answers only a few of the questions in the self-reflection video prompt. |
· Does not meet the criteria. |
|
Criteria 2 |
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Personal Growth
|
· Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed. · Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made examples, well-developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges. · Synthesizes current experience into future implications. |
· Conveys evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed. · Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges. · Some thought of the future implications of current experience. |
· Conveys limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment questions posed. · Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. · Minimal thought of the future implications of current experience. |
· |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Quality |
Includes all of the following:
· Excellent presentation. Is well lighted with face visible. · Clear diction when communicating. · Professionalism is present. |
Includes all of the following:
· Above average presentation. · Area is lighted for visibility, clear diction and communication used. · Professionalism present. |
Includes all of the following:
· Casual presentation and communication. · Professionalism needs improvement. |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Timeliness
|
· Journal reflection is completed within three to five minutes. |
· Journal reflection is greater than five minutes or less than two minutes. |
· Journal reflection is less than 2 minutes |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
20 |
16 |
12 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
17 points minimum |
13 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
Rubric Title: NU673 Units 4, 6, and 9 Assignment Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points: 12 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Subjective Data |
· Includes all relevant subjective data necessary for differentiation of the client’s problem. · Data is presented in a systematic, organized manner |
· Includes most subjective data with omission of two minor details or one major detail. · Most data is presented in a systematic, organized manner |
· Includes subjective data but omits four minor details or two major details. · Some data is presented in a systematic, organized manner |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 2 |
Level III Max Points: 12 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Objective Data |
· Objective data is complete and presented in an organized manner |
· Objective data is complete and presented in an organized manner most of the time |
· Objective data is not complete or is not presented in an organized manner |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points: 12 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Assessment |
· Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete and appropriate to the client. · Diagnostics are complete and appropriate to clients |
· Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete but some may not be appropriate for clients |
· Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is not complete but is appropriate |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points: 12 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Plan |
· Plan includes all relevant measures 95% to 100% Pharmacologic Non-pharmacologic Education Referral Follow-up · Answers all questions applying evidence-based practice guidelines. |
· Plan includes all relevant measures 89% to 94% Pharmacologic Non-Pharmacologic Education Referral Follow-up · Answers a few questions applying evidence-based practice guidelines. |
· Plan includes four of the five relevant measures, but the four are complete. · Answers a few questions. Lack of application of evidence-based practice guidelines. |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 5 |
Level III Max Points: 6 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Professional Application |
· Case incorporates three (3) evidence-based practice articles from the past five (5) years |
· Case incorporates two (2) evidence-based practice articles from the past five (5) years |
· Case incorporates only one (1) evidence-based practice article from the past five (5) years or has any number of non-evidenced-based articles with no evidenced-based articles |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 6
|
Level III Max Points: 6 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
College-level academic writing |
· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability. · Meets the assignment length requirements
|
· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability · Meets the length requirements
|
· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability · Meets the length requirements
|
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
60 |
40 |
30 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
41 points minimum |
31 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
Rubric Title: NU673 Units 4 and 8 Virtual Reality Lab Rubric
Virtual reality patient scenarios must be completed using the Oculus headset unless ADA accommodations have been approved. If not completed via the Oculus headset, a zero will be given.
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III Max |
Level II Max |
Level I Max |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Points: 60 |
Level II Points: 48 |
Level I Points: 36 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Total Score |
· Obtains a total score between 81% to 100% on the virtual reality patient scenario |
· Obtains a total score between 61% to 80% on the virtual reality patient scenario |
· Obtains a total score between 41% to 60% on the virtual reality patient scenario |
· Does not attempt patient scenario · Obtains a total score of 40% or below · Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
60 points |
48 points |
36 points |
0 points |
|
Minimum Total Points |
60 points |
48 points |
36 points |
0 points |
Updated 4/15/2023