unit 2 journal

profileaq24
NU673_Assignment_Rubrics.docx

Purdue Global Black and Gold logo.

Rubric Title: NU673 Units 2 and 8 PMHNP Journal Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 9.6

Level I Max

Points: 7.2

Not Present

0 Points

Content of Paper

· Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner

· Develops content and theories are well

· Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience

· Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper

· Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter

· Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role

· Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials

· Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter

· Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development

· Presents content but is missing depth and or development

· Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 9.6

Level I Max

Points: 7.2

Not Present

0 Points

Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning

· Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content

· Synthesizes information from scholarly resources

· Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources

· Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements

· Supports content with at least one viewpoint.

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Lacks clarification or new information

· Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight

· Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete

· Completes most instruction requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 8

Level II Max

Points: 6.4

Level I Max

Points: 4.8

Not Present

0 Points

Application of Knowledge

· Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources

· Applies practice that is accurate and plausible

· Supports practice with additional scholarly resources

· Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained

· Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Lacks objective criteria

· Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content

· Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner

· Completes most instruction requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 4

Level II Max

Points: 3.2

Level I Max

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

Organization

· Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument

· Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas

· Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement

· Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow

· Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content

· Provides a purpose statement

· Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max

Points: 4

Level II Max

Points: 3.2

Level I Max

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

40

32

24

0

Minimum Total Points

33 points minimum

25 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Rubric Title: NU673 Units 4 and 9 Kaltura/Self-reflection Video Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Content Reflection

· Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments.

· Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.

· Answers all the questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

· Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments.

· Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

· Answers only part of the questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

· Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments

· Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

· Answers only a few of the questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Personal Growth

· Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed.

· Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made examples, well-developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges.

· Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

· Conveys evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed.

· Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges.

· Some thought of the future implications of current experience.

· Conveys limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment questions posed.

· Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed.

· Minimal thought of the future implications of current experience.

·

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Quality

Includes all of the following:

· Excellent presentation. Is well lighted with face visible.

· Clear diction when communicating.

· Professionalism is present.

Includes all of the following:

· Above average presentation.

· Area is lighted for visibility, clear diction and communication used.

· Professionalism present.

Includes all of the following:

· Casual presentation and communication.

· Professionalism needs improvement.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Timeliness

· Journal reflection is completed within three to five minutes.

· Journal reflection is greater than five minutes or less than two minutes.

· Journal reflection is less than 2 minutes

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

20

16

12

0

Minimum Total Points

17 points minimum

13 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Rubric Title: NU673 Units 4, 6, and 9 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Subjective Data

· Includes all relevant subjective data necessary for differentiation of the client’s problem.

· Data is presented in a systematic, organized manner

· Includes most subjective data with omission of two minor details or one major detail.

· Most data is presented in a systematic, organized manner

· Includes subjective data but omits four minor details or two major details.

· Some data is presented in a systematic, organized manner

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Objective Data

· Objective data is complete and presented in an organized manner

· Objective data is complete and presented in an organized manner most of the time

· Objective data is not complete  or is not presented in an organized manner

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Assessment

· Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete and appropriate to the client.

· Diagnostics are complete and appropriate to clients

· Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete but some may not be appropriate for clients

· Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is not complete but is appropriate

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Plan

· Plan includes all relevant measures 95% to 100% Pharmacologic Non-pharmacologic Education Referral Follow-up

· Answers all questions applying evidence-based practice guidelines.

· Plan includes all relevant measures 89% to 94% Pharmacologic Non-Pharmacologic Education Referral Follow-up

· Answers a few questions applying evidence-based practice guidelines.

· Plan includes four of the five relevant measures, but the four are complete.

· Answers a few questions. Lack of application of evidence-based practice guidelines.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max

Points: 6

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Professional

Application

· Case incorporates three (3) evidence-based practice articles from the past five (5) years

· Case incorporates two (2) evidence-based practice articles from the past five (5) years

· Case incorporates only one (1) evidence-based practice article from the past five (5) years or has any number of non-evidenced-based articles with no evidenced-based articles

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 6

Level III Max

Points: 6

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment length requirements

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Meets the length requirements

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

· Meets the length requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60

40

30

0

Minimum Total Points

41 points minimum

31 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Rubric Title: NU673 Units 4 and 8 Virtual Reality Lab Rubric

Virtual reality patient scenarios must be completed using the Oculus headset unless ADA accommodations have been approved. If not completed via the Oculus headset, a zero will be given.

Assignment Criteria

Level III Max

Level II Max

Level I Max

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III

Points: 60

Level II

Points: 48

Level I

Points: 36

Not Present

0 Points

Total Score

· Obtains a total score between 81% to 100% on the virtual reality patient scenario

· Obtains a total score between 61% to 80% on the virtual reality patient scenario

· Obtains a total score between 41% to 60% on the virtual reality patient scenario

· Does not attempt patient scenario

· Obtains a total score of 40% or below

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60 points

48 points

36 points

0 points

Minimum Total Points

60 points

48 points

36 points

0 points

Updated 4/15/2023

image1.jpg