Nursing unit 4 assignment
aq24
NU670_Assignment_Rubrics1.docx
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 2 Journal Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Definition and differentiation of an agonist, partial agonist, agonist, and inverse agonist. |
· Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner · Develops content and theories well · Develops clear definition and differentiation between an agonist, partial agonist, agonist, and inverse agonist. · Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper · Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter · Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role · Develops moderate definition and some differentiation between an agonist, partial agonist, and inverse agonist. · Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter · Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development · Develops vague definitions and differentiation between an agonist, partial agonist, agonist, and inverse agonist. · Presents content but is missing depth and or development · Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 2
|
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Examples of psychiatric medications that work based on each of the principles (agonist, partial agonist, agonist, inverse agonist) and explains the mechanism of action.
|
· Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content · Provides clear and accurate examples for each principle (four in total) · escribes the mechanism of action for each medication example and associated principle. · Synthesizes information from scholarly resources · Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources · Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements · Provides most examples for the principles · Somewhat describes the mechanism of action for each medication example and associated principle. · Supports content with at least one viewpoint. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks clarification or new information · Provides some examples for the principles (two or less) · Vague description of the mechanism of action for the medication examples and associated principles. · Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight · Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Relevance of the principles in relation to each mechanism of action and prescribing practices |
· Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources · Demonstrates clear understanding of each principle and the associated mechanism of action in relation to prescribing practices · Applies practice that is accurate and plausible · Supports practice with additional scholarly resources · Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained · Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice · Demonstrates basic understanding of the importance of each principle and associated mechanism of action in relation to prescribing practices · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks objective criteria · Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content · Demonstrates vague understanding of the importance of each principle and associated mechanism of action in relation to prescribing practices · Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Organization |
· Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument · Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas |
· Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement · Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow |
· Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content · Provides a purpose statement · Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 5
|
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
College-level academic writing |
· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
|
· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
|
· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability · |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
40 |
34 |
24 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
35 points minimum |
25 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 4 Assignment Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points: 15 |
Level II Max Points: 12 |
Level I Max Points: 9 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Identifies risk factors and assessment of patient for suicide |
· Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner · Develops content and theories well · Identifies relevant risk factors for suicide · Identifies appropriate assessment tool for suicidal patient and clear rationale for choice of tool · Identifies pertinent interview skills · Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter · Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role · Identifies most risk factors for suicide · Identifies appropriate assessment tool for suicidal patient, but does not clearly explain rationale for choice of tool · Asked most of the right questions · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter · Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development · Identifies some risk factors for suicide · Identifies an assessment tool, but may not be specific to suicidal ideation and/or does not explain rationale for choice of tool · Asked some of the right questions · Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 2 |
Level III Max Points: 15 |
Level II Max Points: 12 |
Level I Max Points: 9 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Identifies patient’s rights and state laws for involuntary commitment and medication use |
· Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content · Demonstrates clear understanding of patient’s rights · Identifies relevant patient’s rights, state law for involuntary commitment and medication use · Synthesizes information from scholarly resources · Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources · Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements · Demonstrates moderate understanding of patient’s rights · Identifies most state laws for involuntary commitment and medication use · Supports content with at least one viewpoint. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks clarification or new information · Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight · Demonstrates basic understanding of patient’s rights · Identifies some state laws for involuntary commitment and medication use · Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Identifies an alternative treatment therapy for treatment resistant depression |
· Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources · Identifies an appropriate alternative treatment plan for treatment resistant depression, supported with journal article · Applies practice that is accurate and plausible · Supports practice with additional scholarly resources · Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained · Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice · Develops a basic alternative treatment plan, supported with a journal article · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks objective criteria · Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content · Identifies an alternative treatment plan for treatment depression, does not support with journal article · Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Organization |
· Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument · Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas |
· Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement · Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow |
· Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content · Provides a purpose statement · Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 5
|
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
College-level academic writing |
· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability · Meets the assignment length requirements
|
· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability · Meets the length requirements
|
· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability · Meets the length requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
60 |
48 |
36 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
49 points minimum |
37 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 6 Assignment Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points: 15 |
Level II Max Points: 12 |
Level I Max Points: 9 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Identifies one community agency and the resources they offer to patients and their families with severe mental illness |
· Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner · Develops content and theories are well · Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper · Uses at least one scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter · Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role · Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material · Includes only resources provided in the course materials. · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter · Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development · Presents content but is missing depth and or development · Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials. · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 2 |
Level III Max Points: 15 |
Level II Max Points: 12 |
Level I Max Points: 9 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Identify admission requirements into these agencies
|
· Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content · Synthesizes information from scholarly resources · Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources · Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements · Supports content with at least one viewpoint. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks clarification or new information · Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight · Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points: 15 |
Level II Max Points: 12 |
Level I Max Points: 9 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Utilizes evidence-based practice to support resources agency offers to patients and their families with severe mental illness |
· Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources · Demonstrates the ability to utilize evidence-based practice to support resources for patient and family members with severe mental illness · Applies practice that is accurate and plausible · Supports practice with additional scholarly resources · Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained · Demonstrates the ability to utilize evidence-based practice to support resources for patient and family members with severe mental illness · Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks objective criteria · Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content · Demonstrates the ability to utilize evidence-based practice to support resources for patient and family members with severe mental illness · Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Organization |
· Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument · Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas |
· Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement · Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow |
· Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content · Provides a purpose statement · Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 5
|
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
College-level academic writing |
· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability · Meets the assignment length requirements
|
· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability · Meets the length requirements
|
· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability · Meets the length requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
60 |
48 |
36 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
49 points minimum |
37 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 8 Journal Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Demonstrate rationale for choice to prescribe or not prescribe stimulant medications. |
· Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner · Develops content and theories well · Develops clear rationale for choice to prescribe stimulant medications. · Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper · Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter · Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role · Develops moderate rationale for choice to prescribe stimulant medications. · Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials · Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter · Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development · Develops incomplete or vague rationale for choice to prescribe stimulant medications. · Presents content but is missing depth and or development · Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 2
|
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Develop an alternative treatment plan for management of patient’s Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with rationale for choice.
|
· Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content · Provides an appropriate alternative with clear rationale for choice. · Synthesizes information from scholarly resources · Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources · Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements · Provides an alternative treatment plan with some rationale for choice. · Supports content with at least one viewpoint. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks clarification or new information · Provides an alternative treatment plan with vague or incomplete rationale for choice. · Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight · Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Develop a strategy to show adherence and prevent diversion. |
· Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources · Develops a complete strategy to show adherence to prescribed medications and prevent diversion. · Applies practice that is accurate and plausible · Supports practice with additional scholarly resources · Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained · Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice · Develops a mostly complete strategy to show adherence to prescribed medications and prevent diversion. · Completes all instruction requirements |
· Lacks objective criteria · Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content · Develops a basic or incomplete strategy to show adherence to prescribed medications and prevent diversion. · Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner · Completes most instruction requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Organization |
· Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument · Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas |
· Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement · Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow |
· Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content · Provides a purpose statement · Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 5
|
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
College-level academic writing |
· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability ·
|
· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability ·
|
· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability · |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
40 |
34 |
24 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
35 points minimum |
25 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 9 Assignment Grading Rubric
Rubric Title: Unit 4 and 9 Kaltura Journal Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criterion 1 |
Level III Max Points Points: 8 |
Level II Max Points Points: 6.4 |
Level I Max Points Points: 4.8 |
0 Points |
|
Content |
· Content is comprehensive and persuasive. Major points are stated and are well supported. · The Kaltura/self-reflection addresses all components of the assignment and incorporates the required content in a succinct, well-delivered manner. |
· Content is adequate. Major points are stated. Discussion is adequate and addresses the requirements. · Content and purpose of the Kaltura/self-reflection are articulated. |
· Content is not comprehensive or persuasive. · Major points are addressed but not well supported. · Responses are inadequate or content is inconsistent with regard to purpose or clarity of thought. |
· Does not meet the criteria. |
|
Criterion 2 |
Level III Max Points Points: 8 |
Level II Max Points Points: 6.4 |
Level I Max Points Points: 4.8 |
0 Points |
|
Organization & Structure |
· Structure of the Kaltura/self-reflection is very clear and easy to follow. · Transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the journal. · The conclusions are logical and flow from the rest of the writing. |
· Structure is clear and easy to follow. · Transitions are present. Conclusions are logical |
· Structure of the Kaltura/self-reflection is not easy to follow. Transitions need improvement. · Insights do not flow from the rest of the journal. |
· Does not meet the criteria. |
|
Criterion 3 |
Level III Max Points Points: 4 |
Level II Max Points Points: 3.2 |
Level I Max Points Points: 2.4 |
0 Points |
|
Grammar; punctuation & spelling; or video quality |
· Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. · Spelling is correct. Language is clear and precise. · Sentences display strong, varied structure. · Video is high quality, well presented, and understandable. |
· Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed with only minor errors that do not detract from the readability of the work. Spelling is correct. · Video has some areas of poor quality and/or is difficult to understand in 2 or more areas . |
· Kaltura/self-reflection contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. · Video has major flaws and/or is difficult to understand in more than 4 areas. |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
20 |
18 |
12 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
17 points minimum |
11 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
