journal unit 2
aq24
NU670_Assignment_Rubrics.docx.pdf
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 2 Journal Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Level III Level II Level I Not Present Criteria 1 Level III Max
Points: 10 Level II Max
Points: 8 Level I Max
Points: 6 Not Present
0 Points Definition and differentiation of an agonist, partial agonist, agonist, and inverse agonist.
Demonstrates a well- articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner
●
Develops content and theories well
●
Develops clear definition and differentiation between an agonist, partial agonist, agonist, and inverse agonist.
●
Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience
●
Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper
●
Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials
●
Completes all instruction
●
Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter
●
Explains and applies knowledge of evidence- based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role
●
Develops moderate definition and some differentiation between an agonist, partial agonist, and inverse agonist.
●
Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials
●
Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter
●
Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role- development
●
Develops vague definitions and differentiation between an agonist, partial agonist, agonist, and inverse agonist.
●
Presents content but is missing depth and or development
●
Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Criteria 2 Level III Max Points: 10
Level II Max Points: 8
Level I Max Points: 6
Not Present 0 Points
Examples of psychiatric medications that work based on each of the principles (agonist, partial agonist, agonist, inverse agonist) and explains the mechanism of action.
requirements
Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content
●
Provides clear and accurate examples for each principle (four in total)
●
escribes the mechanism of action for each medication example and associated principle.
●
Synthesizes information from scholarly resources
●
Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information
●
Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources
●
Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements
●
Provides most examples for the principles
●
Somewhat describes the mechanism of action for each medication example and associated principle.
●
Supports content with at least one viewpoint.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Lacks clarification or new information
●
Provides some examples for the principles (two or less)
●
Vague description of the mechanism of action for the medication examples and associated principles.
●
Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight
●
Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete
●
Completes most instruction requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Criteria 3 Level III Max Points: 10
Level II Max Points: 8
Level I Max Points: 6
Not Present 0 Points
Relevance of the principles in relation to each mechanism of action and prescribing practices
or viewpoints Completes all instruction requirements
●
Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources
●
Demonstrates clear ●
Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained
●
Indicates how the ●
Lacks objective criteria● Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content
● Does not meet the criteria●
Criteria 4 Level III Max Points: 5
Level II Max Points: 4
Level I Max Points: 3
Not Present 0 Points
Organization
Criteria 5 Level III Max Points: 5
Level II Max Points: 4
Level I Max Points: 3
Not Present 0 Points
College-level academic writing
understanding of each principle and the associated mechanism of action in relation to prescribing practices Applies practice that is accurate and plausible
●
Supports practice with additional scholarly resources
●
Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well- developed manner with citations for validation
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
information will be used within their professional practice Demonstrates basic understanding of the importance of each principle and associated mechanism of action in relation to prescribing practices
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Demonstrates vague understanding of the importance of each principle and associated mechanism of action in relation to prescribing practices
●
Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner
●
Completes most instruction requirements
●
Provides well- organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument
●
Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas
●
Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement
●
Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow
●
Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content
●
Provides a purpose statement
●
Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or
● Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation
● Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors
● Does not meet the criteria●
Maximum Total Points 40 34 24 0 Minimum Total Points 35 points minimum 25 points minimum 1 point minimum 0
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 4 Assignment Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Level III Level II Level I Not Present
punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
errors that do not interfere with the readability
makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability
●
Criteria 1 Level III Max Points: 15
Level II Max Points: 12
Level I Max Points: 9
Not Present 0 Points
Identifies risk factors and assessment of patient for suicide
Demonstrates a well- articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner
●
Develops content and theories well
●
Identifies relevant risk factors for suicide
●
Identifies appropriate assessment tool for suicidal patient and clear rationale for choice of tool
●
Identifies pertinent interview skills
●
Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience
●
Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the
●
Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter
●
Explains and applies knowledge of evidence- based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role
●
Identifies most risk factors for suicide
●
Identifies appropriate assessment tool for suicidal patient, but does not clearly explain rationale for choice of tool
●
Asked most of the right questions
●
Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter
●
Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role- development
●
Identifies some risk factors for suicide
●
Identifies an assessment tool, but may not be specific to suicidal ideation and/or does not explain rationale for choice of tool
●
Asked some of the right questions
●
Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Criteria 2 Level III Max Points: 15
Level II Max Points: 12
Level I Max Points: 9
Not Present 0 Points
Identifies patient’s rights and state laws for involuntary commitment and medication use
Criteria 3 Level III Max Points: 10
Level II Max Points: 8
Level I Max Points: 6
Not Present 0 Points
Identifies an alternative treatment therapy for treatment resistant
paper Completes all instruction requirements
●
Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content
●
Demonstrates clear understanding of patient’s rights
●
Identifies relevant patient’s rights, state law for involuntary commitment and medication use
●
Synthesizes information from scholarly resources
●
Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources
●
Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements
●
Demonstrates moderate understanding of patient’s rights
●
Identifies most state laws for involuntary commitment and medication use
●
Supports content with at least one viewpoint.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Lacks clarification or new information
●
Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight
●
Demonstrates basic understanding of patient’s rights
●
Identifies some state laws for involuntary commitment and medication use
●
Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete
●
Completes most instruction requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly
● Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge
● Lacks objective criteria● Applies superficial bridge between the assignment
● Does not meet the criteria●
depression
Criteria 4 Level III Max Points: 10
Level II Max Points: 8
Level I Max Points: 6
Not Present 0 Points
Organization
Criteria 5 Level III Max Points: 10
Level II Max Points: 8
Level I Max Points: 6
Not Present 0 Points
College-level academic writing
resources Identifies an appropriate alternative treatment plan for treatment resistant depression, supported with journal article
●
Applies practice that is accurate and plausible
●
Supports practice with additional scholarly resources
●
Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well- developed manner with citations for validation
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
gained Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice
●
Develops a basic alternative treatment plan, supported with a journal article
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
and the broader course content Identifies an alternative treatment plan for treatment depression, does not support with journal article
●
Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner
●
Completes most instruction requirements
●
Provides well- organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument
●
Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas
●
Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement
●
Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow
●
Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content
●
Provides a purpose statement
●
Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Includes no more than three grammatical,
● Includes no more than four grammatical,
● Includes five or more grammatical, spelling,
● Does not meet the criteria●
Maximum Total Points 60 48 36 0 Minimum Total Points 49 points minimum 37 points minimum 1 point minimum 0
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 6 Assignment Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Level III Level II Level I Not Present Criteria 1 Level III Max
Points: 15 Level II Max Points: 12
Level I Max Points: 9
Not Present 0 Points
Identifies one community agency and the resources they offer to patients and their families with severe mental illness
spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability Meets the assignment length requirements
●
spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability Meets the length requirements
●
and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability Meets the length requirements
●
Demonstrates a well- articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner
●
Develops content and theories are well
●
Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience
●
Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter
●
Explains and applies knowledge of evidence- based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role
●
Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material
●
Includes only resources provided in the course
●
Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter
●
Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role- development
●
Presents content but is missing depth and or development
●
Uses only scholarly ●
Does not meet the criteria●
Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper
●
Uses at least one scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials
●
Completes all instruction
●
materials. Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
resources that were provided in the course materials. Completes most instruction requirements
●
Criteria 2 Level III Max Points: 15
Level II Max Points: 12
Level I Max Points: 9
Not Present 0 Points
Identify admission requirements into these agencies
Criteria 3 Level III Max Points: 15
Level II Max Points: 12
Level I Max Points: 9
Not Present 0 Points
Utilizes evidence-based practice to support resources agency offers to patients and their families with severe mental illness
requirements
Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content
●
Synthesizes information from scholarly resources
●
Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources
●
Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements
●
Supports content with at least one viewpoint.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Lacks clarification or new information
●
Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight
●
Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete
●
Completes most instruction requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources
●
Demonstrates the ability to utilize evidence-based practice to support resources for patient and family members with severe mental illness
●
Applies practice that is ●
Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained
●
Demonstrates the ability to utilize evidence-based practice to support resources for patient and family members with severe mental illness
●
Indicates how the information will be used within their professional
●
Lacks objective criteria● Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content
●
Demonstrates the ability to utilize evidence-based practice to support resources for patient and family members with severe mental illness
●
Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge
●
Does not meet the criteria●
accurate and plausible Supports practice with additional scholarly resources
●
Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well- developed manner with citations for validation
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
practice Completes all instruction requirements
● to their clinical practice in a vague manner Completes most instruction requirements
●
Criteria 4 Level III Max Points: 10
Level II Max Points: 8
Level I Max Points: 6
Not Present 0 Points
Organization
Criteria 5 Level III Max Points: 5
Level II Max Points: 4
Level I Max Points: 3
Not Present 0 Points
College-level academic writing
Provides well- organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument
●
Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas
●
Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement
●
Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow
●
Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content
●
Provides a purpose statement
●
Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
●
Meets the assignment length requirements
●
Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
●
Meets the length requirements
●
Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability
●
Meets the length requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Maximum Total Points 60 48 36 0 Minimum Total Points 49 points minimum 37 points minimum 1 point minimum 0
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 8 Journal Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Level III Level II Level I Not Present Criteria 1 Level III Max
Points: 10 Level II Max
Points: 8 Level I Max
Points: 6 Not Present
0 Points Demonstrate rationale for choice to prescribe or not prescribe stimulant medications.
Criteria 2 Level III Max Points: 10
Level II Max Points: 8
Level I Max Points: 6
Not Present 0 Points
Demonstrates a well- articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner
●
Develops content and theories well
●
Develops clear rationale for choice to prescribe stimulant medications.
●
Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience
●
Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper
●
Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter
●
Explains and applies knowledge of evidence- based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role
●
Develops moderate rationale for choice to prescribe stimulant medications.
●
Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials
●
Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter
●
Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role- development
●
Develops incomplete or vague rationale for choice to prescribe stimulant medications.
●
Presents content but is missing depth and or development
●
Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Develop an alternative treatment plan for management of patient’s Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with rationale for choice.
Criteria 3 Level III Max Points: 10
Level II Max Points: 8
Level I Max Points: 6
Not Present 0 Points
Develop a strategy to show adherence and prevent diversion.
Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content
●
Provides an appropriate alternative with clear rationale for choice.
●
Synthesizes information from scholarly resources
●
Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources
●
Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements
●
Provides an alternative treatment plan with some rationale for choice.
●
Supports content with at least one viewpoint.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Lacks clarification or new information
●
Provides an alternative treatment plan with vague or incomplete rationale for choice.
●
Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight
●
Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete
●
Completes most instruction requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources
●
Develops a complete strategy to show adherence to prescribed medications and prevent diversion.
●
Applies practice that is accurate and plausible
●
Supports practice with ●
Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained
●
Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice
●
Develops a mostly complete strategy to show adherence to prescribed medications and prevent diversion.
●
Completes all instruction ●
Lacks objective criteria● Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content
●
Develops a basic or incomplete strategy to show adherence to prescribed medications and prevent diversion.
●
Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Criteria 4 Level III Max Points: 5
Level II Max Points: 4
Level I Max Points: 3
Not Present 0 Points
Organization
Criteria 5 Level III Max Points: 5
Level II Max Points: 4
Level I Max Points: 3
Not Present 0 Points
College-level academic writing
additional scholarly resources Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well- developed manner with citations for validation
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
requirements Completes most instruction requirements
●
Provides well- organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument
●
Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas
●
Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement
●
Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow
●
Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content
●
Provides a purpose statement
●
Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that
● Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not
● Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding
● Does not meet the criteria●
Maximum Total Points 40 34 24 0 Minimum Total Points 35 points minimum 25 points minimum 1 point minimum 0
Rubric Title: NU670 Unit 9 Assignment Grading Rubric
do not interfere with the readability
●
interfere with the readability
●
parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability
●
Assignment Criteria Level III Level II Level I Not Present Criteria 1 Level III Max
Points: 15 Level II Max Points: 12
Level I Max Points: 9
Not Present 0 Points
Identify state of practice, current practice environment, safe prescribing recommendations, prescription drug monitoring, and telehealth laws.
Demonstrates a well- articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner
●
Develops content and theories are well
●
Identifies state of practice
●
Identifies practice environment
●
Demonstrates understanding of safe prescribing recommendations for practice state
●
Describes status of prescription drug monitoring system in practice state
●
Identifies telehealth laws for practice state.
●
Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience
●
Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper
●
Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials
●
Completes all ●
Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter
●
Explains and applies knowledge of evidence- based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role
●
Identifies most risk factors for suicide
●
Identifies appropriate assessment tool for suicidal patient, but does not explain rationale for choice of tool
●
Asked most of the right questions
●
Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials
●
Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter
●
Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role- development
●
Identifies some risk factors for suicide
●
Identifies an assessment tool, but may not be specific to suicidal ideation and/or does not explain rationale for choice of tool
●
Asked some of the right questions
●
Presents content but is missing depth and or development
●
Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Criteria 2 Level III Max Points: 15
Level II Max Points: 12
Level I Max Points: 9
Not Present 0 Points
Demonstrates understanding and identification of barriers to practice for APRNs in practice state.
instruction requirements
Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content
●
Clearly identifies barriers to practice for APRNs in practice state.
●
Synthesizes
Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources
●
Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements
●
Demonstrates some identification and understanding of barriers to practice for APRNs in
●
Lacks clarification or new information
●
Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight
●
Demonstrates basic identification and understanding of barriers to practice for APRNs in practice state
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Criteria 3 Level III Max Points: 15
Level II Max Points: 12
Level I Max Points: 9
Not Present 0 Points
Identifies local or state organizations to support APRN practice in state and requirements to join the organization. Identify any current projects or initiatives the organization is currently working on to improve or remove barriers in
Synthesizes information from scholarly resources
●
Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
to practice for APRNs in practice state. Supports content with at least one viewpoint.
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
practice state. Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete
●
Completes most instruction requirements
●
Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources
●
Identifies a local or state organization to support APRN practice in state
●
Identifies ●
Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained
●
Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice
●
Identifies a local or state ●
Lacks objective criteria● Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content
●
Identifies a local or state organization for APRNs in practice state
●
Does not address any ●
Does not meet the criteria●
the practice state.
Criteria 4 Level III Max Points: 10
Level II Max Points: 8
Level I Max Points: 6
Not Present 0 Points
Organization
Criteria 5 Level III Max Points: 5
Level II Max Points: 4
Level I Max Points: 3
Not Present 0 Points
requirements to join the chosen organization Identifies project or initiative organization is working on to improve or remove barriers for APRNs in practice state
●
Applies practice that is accurate and plausible
●
Supports practice with additional scholarly resources
●
Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well- developed manner with citations for validation
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
organization for APRNs in practice state Identifies some requirements to join the chosen organization
●
Identifies project or initiative organization is working on to improve or remove barriers for APRNs in practice state
●
Completes all instruction requirements
●
requirements to join the chosen organization Does not address any projects or initiatives chosen organization is working on to improve or remove barriers for APRNs in practice state
●
Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner
●
Completes most instruction requirements
●
Provides well- organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument
●
Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas
●
Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement
●
Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow
●
Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content
●
Provides a purpose statement
●
Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work
●
Does not meet the criteria●
College-level academic writing
Maximum Total Points 60 48 36 0 Minimum Total Points 49 points minimum 37 points minimum 1 point minimum 0
Rubric Title: Unit 4 and 9 Kaltura Journal Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Level III Level II Level I Not Present Criterion 1 Level III Max Points
Points: 8 Level II Max Points
Points: 6.4 Level I Max Points
Points: 4.8 0 Points
Content
Criterion 2 Level III Max Points Points: 8
Level II Max Points Points: 6.4
Level I Max Points Points: 4.8
0 Points
Organization & Structure
Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
●
Meets the assignment length requirements
●
Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
●
Meets the length requirements
●
Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability
●
Meets the length requirements
●
Does not meet the criteria●
Content is comprehensive and persuasive. Major points are stated and are well supported.
●
The Kaltura/self- reflection addresses all components of the assignment and incorporates the required content in a succinct, well-delivered manner.
●
Content is adequate. Major points are stated. Discussion is adequate and addresses the requirements.
●
Content and purpose of the Kaltura/self-reflection are articulated.
●
Content is not comprehensive or persuasive.
●
Major points are addressed but not well supported.
●
Responses are inadequate or content is inconsistent with regard to purpose or clarity of thought.
●
Does not meet the criteria.
●
Structure of the Kaltura/self-reflection is very clear and easy to follow.
●
Transitions are logical ●
Structure is clear and easy to follow.
●
Transitions are present. Conclusions are logical
●
Structure of the Kaltura/self-reflection is not easy to follow. Transitions need improvement.
● Does not meet the criteria.
●
Criterion 3 Level III Max Points Points: 4
Level II Max Points Points: 3.2
Level I Max Points Points: 2.4
0 Points
Grammar; punctuation & spelling; or video quality
Maximum Total Points 20 18 12 0 Minimum Total Points 17 points minimum 11 points minimum 1 point minimum 0
and maintain the flow of thought throughout the journal. The conclusions are logical and flow from the rest of the writing.
●
Insights do not flow from the rest of the journal.
●
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed.
●
Spelling is correct. Language is clear and precise.
●
Sentences display strong, varied structure.
●
Video is high quality, well presented, and understandable.
●
Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed with only minor errors that do not detract from the readability of the work. Spelling is correct.
●
Video has some areas of poor quality and/or is difficult to understand in 2 or more areas.
●
Kaltura/self-reflection contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
●
Video has major flaws and/or is difficult to understand in more than 4 areas.
●
Does not meet the criteria
●
