NU560-8D-Unit 4 Assignment Literature Review

profileForeveryng
NU560UNIT4RUBRIC.docx

NU 560 -Lit Review Rubric

NU 560 -Lit Review Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

NU560-CO1; PRICE-P

25 pts

Above Expectations

Exquisitely states purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.

21.25 pts

Meets Expectations

Moderately states purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.

18.75 pts

Below Expectations

Minimally states purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.

11.25 pts

Expectations not addressed

Does not state purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody/Content

NU560-CO1; NU560-CO3; NU560-CO5; NU560-CO6; PRICE-P; PRICE-I

25 pts

Above Expectations

Conveys full understanding of the topic by fully addressing: Select appropriate sources of evidence to support your EBPG/Translational research problem and compose a literature review supporting your EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding your investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to your EBPG/Translational research proposal.

22.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Conveys understanding of the topic by addressing: Select appropriate sources of evidence to support your EBPG/Translational research problem and compose a literature review supporting your EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding your investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to your EBPG/Translational research proposal.

20 pts

Below Expectations

Conveys minimal understanding of the topic: Select appropriate sources of evidence to support your EBPG/Translational research problem and compose a literature review supporting your EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding your investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to your EBPG/Translational research proposal

17.5 pts

Expectations not addressed

Does not address: Select appropriate sources of evidence to support your EBPG/Translational research problem and compose a literature review supporting your EBPG/Translational research proposal Include a discussion regarding your investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to your EBPG/Translational research proposal.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody/Organization

NU560-CO6; PRICE-I

25 pts

Above Expectations

• Organized throughout • Logical, clear sequence • Exhibits critical thinking • 4-5 pages (not including title page and reference page)

22.5 pts

Meets Expectations

• Well organized • Easy to follow • Shows some original thought • 3-4 pages (not including title page and reference page)

20 pts

Below Expectations

• Some organizational. problems • Shows little original thought • Less than 3pages (not including title page and reference page)

17.5 pts

Expectations not addressed

• Difficult to follow • May jump topics • Shows little original thought • Less than 2 pages (not including title page and reference page)

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelops paper/References

NU560-CO1; PRICE-P

15 pts

Above Expectations

Draws content from current & appropriate body of literature. At least 5 references used.

10.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Draws content from current & appropriate body of literature. At least 4 references used.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Draws content from current & appropriate body of literature. At least 3 references used

7.5 pts

Below Expectations

Less than 3 references.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

PRICE-P; PRICE-I

5 pts

Above Expectations

Uses appropriate headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion. Uses correct APA format for title page, spacing, margins, headings, and references. No errors.

4.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Does not use headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion or does not follow APA guidelines for headings. Uses APA format for title page, spacing, margins, headings, and references with 1-5 minor errors noted.

4 pts

Below Expectations

Does not use headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion. Uses APA format for title page, spacing, margins, headings, and references with more than 5 errors noted.

3.5 pts

Expectations not addressed

Does not use headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion. Does not adhere to APA guidelines.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Spelling

PRICE-I; PRICE-P

5 pts

Above Expectations

No errors noted.

4.5 pts

Meets Expectations

1-2 grammar and/or spelling errors.

4 pts

Below Expectations

3-4 grammar and/or spelling errors.

3.5 pts

Expectations not addressed

More than 5 grammar and/or spelling errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100