| Instructions: First enter total points possible in cell C13, under the rubric. Next enter scores (between 0 and 4) into yellow cells only in column F. |
| Unit 4: Evidence from the Literature |
| | Inappropriate | Below Average | Average | Above Average | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Introduction | Incomplete or missing introduction | The introduction shows some structure but does not create a strong sense of what is to follow. May be overly detailed or incomplete and is somewhat appealing to the audience | The introduction is clear and coherent and relates to the topic | The introduction presents the overall topic and draws the audience into the presentation with compelling questions or by relating to the audience's interests or goals | | 15% | 0.00 |
| Correctly identifies type of primary source and research design of each study inlcuding level of evidence | Content is missing or incomplete | The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. | The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information; some details omitted | The content is written clearly and concisely with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information | | 25% | 0.00 |
| Summarizes each study with correct discussion of salient parts of the study including purpose, methodology,results, and how it supports evidence for practice | Content is missing or incomplete | The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. | The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information; some details omitted | The content is written clearly and concisely with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information | | 25% | 0.00 |
| Conclusion | There is no indication the author tried to make a conclusion | Conclusion is weak and doesn't conclude the paper | Some of the conclusions, were not supported in the body of the report. | The author was able to make succinct and precise conclusions | | 15% | 0.00 |
| Spelling/Grammar | Significant errors in spelling and/or grammar | Poor spelling and grammar are apparent and/or with many spelling and or grammatical errors | Uses Standard American English with rare errors and misspellings. Occasional errors in spelling or grammar | Consistently uses Standard American English with no misspellings. No errors with grammar or writing mechanics | | 10% | 0.00 |
| APA/proper formatting | Significant errors in APA and/or formatting no references cited | Poor APA formatting with 1-2 references | Follows APA formatting occasional errors in citations or format | Consistently follows correct APA and formatting with correct reference list 3-5 scholarly references provided | | 10% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | | 100% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | Final Score | | 0 |
| | | | | | Percentage | | 0.00% |
| Total available points = | | 120 | 4 |
| Rubric Score | | Grade points | | Percentage |
| Low | High | Low | High | Low | High |
| 3.5 | 4.0 | 108 | 120 | 90% | 100% |
| 2.5 | 3.49 | 96 | 108 | 80% | 89.99% |
| 1.7 | 2.49 | 84 | 96 | 70% | 79.99% |
| 1.0 | 1.69 | 72 | 84 | 60% | 69.99% |
| 0.0 | 1.00 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 59.99% |
MissyCarl
NU310_Unit4AssignmentGradingRubric1.xlsx
