|
Introduction
|
|
Constructs well thought introduction clearly preparing reader for contents of the powerpoint (10 pts)
10points
|
Constructs introduction preparing reader for contents of paper. Main idea clear (8 pts)
8points
|
Constructs introduction with minimal preparation for contents of paper. Main idea vague (7 p)
7points
|
Introduction disorganized. Main idea vague or missing. 3:
3points
|
paper plagiarized or no introduction earns a zero (0)
0points
|
|
|
Identifies the topic and the ANA official position/other contemporary issue
|
|
Well-stated complete description of the topic and ANA official position/other contemporary issue (10 pts)
10points
|
Provides a simple description of the topic and ANA official position with little detail and limited perspective (8 pts)
8points
|
Good description of the topic and ANA official position with identifiable gaps (6 pts)
6points
|
Disorganized discription with multiple gaps. 3:
3points
|
paper plagiarized or no description of topic and ANA position earns a zero (0)
0points
|
|
|
Compares and Contrasts the position with another federal, national, or global organization
|
|
Well-stated, detailed comparison and contrast with other organization on the same or similar position – well discussed with supporting evidence (10 pts)
10points
|
Provides simple comparison and contrast of the position with another organization (8 pts)
3points
|
Poor analysis of how the activity/nurse leader position impacts nursing practice with identifiable multiple gaps. 3
3points
|
Compares or contrasts position conveying little understanding of official position and applicability of the organizations (7 pts)
2points
|
or paper plagiarized or no comparison and contrast earns a zero (0)
0points
|
|
|
Describes how the selected position supports at least one QSEN competency and relevant KSA’s
|
|
Well-stated description is detailed including appropriate competency and KSA; examples given (15 pts)
15points
|
Description is superficial and limited in scope and details of the selected QSEN competency and KSA (13 pts)
13points
|
Description conveys little understanding of the official position and selected QSEN competency and KSA's (11 pts)
11points
|
Poor description of how the selected position supports QSEN competencies. 3:
3points
|
no description of QSEN and the ANA position earns a zero or paper plagiarized
0points
|
|
|
Analyze the impact of the position on the nursing profession
|
|
Robust analysis of the impact of the position on the nursing profession and broader public - examples (15 pts)
15points
|
Good analysis with gaps addressing impact of the position on the nursing profession and broader public - examples (13 pts)
13points
|
Superficial analysis of impact of the position on the nursing profession and broader public - did not include information; few to no examples (11 pts)
11points
|
Little to no analysis of the impact of the position on the nursing profession; Selection of this criteria is due to plagiarism throughout the powerpoint
0points
|
|
|
Discuss how a coach leader would promote this position with novice nurses.
|
|
Provides a complete discussion of the coach leader and promotion of the select position with novice nurses (10 pts)
10points
|
Superficial discussion of the coach leader, needs of the novice nurse, or inclusion of the position (8 pts)
8points
|
Discussion lacks depth or no inclusion of the coach leader 3 pts)
3points
|
Selection of this criteria is due to plagiarism throughout the powerpoint
0points
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
Constructs well thought conclusion clearly summarizing contents of paper (10 pts)
10points
|
Constructs conclusion summarizes contents of paper. Main idea clear (8 pts)
8points
|
Constructs conclusion with minimal summary of contents of paper. Main idea vague
5points
|
Conclusion disorganized. Main idea vague or missing.
3points
|
Do not select unless paper plagiarized
0points
|
|
|
Attribution and references
|
|
All sources properly attributed, no plagiarism, paraphrasing and direct quotes as needed. Adheres to APA format (10 pts)
10points
|
Sources properly attributed, no plagiarism. Adheres to APA format but lacks 1-2 elements (8 pts)
8points
|
Attribution present but significantly incomplete, papers contains plagiarism. Adheres to a small number of APA elements (3 pts)
3points
|
"No attribution which leads to plagiarism; Does not adhere to APA elements
0points
|
|
|
Presentation: Presentation informative with good flow from beginning to end. Professionally dress and presentation with great voice inflection, eye contact, and use of visuals. Content is accurate, presented in a logical order. Images cropped and clear. Does not crowd slides or read from slides. Time 8-10 mins
|
|
Exceeds criteria from beginning to end. Professionally done with great voice inflection, eye contact, and use of visuals.Adheres to time limit (10 pts)
10points
|
Meets criteria with 1-2 presentation errors. Over >10 mins ( 8pts)
8points
|
Presentation with 3 or more errors; Under <8 mins (6 pts)
6points
|
Presentation in beginning level of competency. less than 5 minutes (3 pts)
3points
|
Do not select unless paper plagiarized
0points
|
|
WillyJ@18
NSG470POWERPOINTRUBRIC.docx
