PICOT /Research question
Rubric
|
APA Assignment grading Rubric |
% |
Total |
|
5 in-text citations formatted using current APA guidelines |
10% for each correctly cited in-text citation |
50% |
|
Reference list of 5 articles formatted using current APA guidelines |
10% for each correctly cited reference list |
50% |
|
Grand total |
|
100% |
Literature Review Table Rubric
|
Literature Review Table Rubric |
|
||||
|
|
Unsatisfactory 0 |
Partially Proficient 15 |
Proficient 20 |
Exemplary 25 |
Score |
|
Articles |
0-1 primary research articles are identified |
2-3 primary research articles are identified. |
4 primary research articles are identified. |
5 primary research articles are identified. |
|
|
Articles appropriate to PICOT |
0-1 primary research articles appropriate to PICOT |
2-3 primary research articles appropriate to PICOT |
4 primary research articles appropriate to PICOT |
5 primary research articles appropriate to PICOT |
|
|
Articles uploaded to Moodle |
0-1 primary research articles are included with table |
2-3 primary research articles are included with table |
4 primary research articles are included with table |
5 primary research articles are included with table |
|
|
Table |
There are major errors in the table |
There are several errors and/or incomplete data |
There are some missing data and/or errors |
The table is completed appropriately |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
/100 |
Literature Review Rubric
|
15-10 |
10-5 |
5-0 |
|
Meets all outlined criteria and is succinct and sufficient. Logically demonstrates the need for this research question |
Does not meet one of the criteria but is well organized, and sufficient. Logically demonstrates the need for this research question. |
Does not meet two or more of the criteria and/ or is not organized, and sufficient. The reader cannot conclude the “so what”. |
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical question is clearly stated |
Clinical question can be implied but was not clearly stated. |
Clinical question was not stated and/or were not apparent from the literature review. |
|
35-25 |
25-15 |
15-0 |
|
The appraisal reflects accurate analysis of the essential components for all studies Five appropriate articles are reviewed. |
The appraisal reflects most (lacking 2 or more elements) of the essential components for one or all the studies Four appropriate articles are reviewed. |
The appraisal reflects some (lacking 4 or more elements) of the essential components for either study Three or fewer appropriate articles are reviewed. |
|
25-15 |
15-10 |
10-5 |
|
Meets criteria. Well organized, follows a logical sequence that allows the reader to arrive at a logical conclusion. PICOT conclusion is clear and well-supported by the literature. |
Does not meet 1-2 of the criteria but is organized, and/or demonstrates illogical sequencing or structure. Conclusions relating to PICOT are vague and/or unsupported by the literature. |
Does not meet >2 criteria and/or is weakly organized with no logical sequencing or structure. Conclusions relating to PICOT cannot be made. |
|
10-7 |
6-4 |
3-0 |
|
There are no major grammatical errors. |
There are a few grammatical errors. |
There are major grammatical errors. |
Introduction: Provides rationale for student selection of
literature Discussed search terms and techniques.
Demonstrates the need for this research question
Clinical Question (PICOT) Includes the clinical question
Appraisal of Articles: Uses established critical appraisal criteria to evaluate essential components of each reviewed study, including but not limited to:
· Type and size of sample
· Reliability and validity of instruments
· Methodology
· Consistency of data collection and procedures
· Appropriate data analysis
· Results
· Identification of limitations
Synthesis/Conclusion:
Reflection on the analysis and synthesis of material Identifies gaps and inconsistencies Summarizes overall strengths and weaknesses of the studies reviewed Discuss similarities and differences of articles
Grammar
Stratford University School of Nursing
Syllabus Supplement
3
3
3
|
10-8 |
7-5 |
4-0 |
|
Incorporates the text, course materials, and selected readings; does not use Wikipedia or other non-academic resources. There are minimal to no errors in formatting, referencing and style. |
There are moderate errors in APA formatting, style, and referencing. |
Severe errors in APA style, formatting, or referencing. Violates the School of Nursing Student's Personal Integrity Statement more than 2 times. |
|
|
|
|
Support and Referencing:
See Turn-It-In
SEE SON
INTEGRITY
STATEMENT
15
Stratford University School of Nursing Syllabus Supplement
Student Personal Integrity Statement
I,(print your name here), am provided a hard copy (or e-copy for online courses) of the Syllabus and Syllabus Supplement in NSG 410. I am aware of:
∑ All due dates, including exams, assignments, and penalties associated with late work/exams,
∑ Attendance policies and student's responsibilities related to attendance and student nurse dress code,
∑ Policies related to classroom and clinical behavior.
I recognize that personal integrity and truth telling is essential to the professional practice of Nursing as discussed in the School of Nursing Handbook. I have read the syllabus and agree that:
∑ I alone am responsible for my personal behavior and academic conduct.
∑ Any academic misconduct or dishonesty are grounds for course failure and may result in probation, suspension or dismissal from the Nursing Program and Stratford University. These include but are not limited to: o Cheating on exams, o Using papers written by anyone other than myself, my team or from a concurrent class o Using papers turned in for grade during previous or current terms
· Copying work from the internet or books or articles and not giving full credit to the authors of that work; no more than 2 sentences may be quoted or paraphrased with intext citation per 6 sentences.
· Falsifying documents, records or presentations, o Claiming to have done required course work (theory or clinical) that in fact I did not do
· Providing my work (papers, exams, presentations) to another student
∑ I am expected to arrive at class on time, stay for the entire time allotted course
∑ I am expected to follow class rules outlined in the Syllabus/Syllabus Supplement. Example: No food in classrooms
∑ I am expected to treat my professor and my classmates with respect even when we disagree.
I accept all policies as written and agree to follow the Syllabus/Syllabus Supplement as outlined.
Signed:
Student Signature / Date
Dr Akila Roberts March 14, 2022
Faculty Signature / Date
[Student keeps one copy/faculty files signed copy in students nursing file]
16