| NSG 290 Module 2 Assignment | | | | Total Available Points = | | | 115 |
| Instructions: enter score (1-4) in column F |
| | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | | | Final |
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Score | Weight | Score |
| SMARTER Goal | Student attempts to define a goal. Does not support goal with specific achievements or goal statements. Lacks sufficient details and insights. | Student develops a a goal. Supports goal with some achievements or goal statements. Lacks details and/or insights. | Student develops a clear goal. Supports goal with specific achievements or goal statements. May lack details and/or insights. | Student develops a clear, comprehensive goal. Supports goal with specific achievements and goal statements. Reflects deep insights. | 0 | 20% | 0.00 |
| MEASURABALE | Student attempts to identify measurable outcomes. Lacks sufficient details and insights and/or measurements do not support goal. . | Student identifies measurable outcomes. Minimal details provided and/or measurements do not support goal. | Student accurately identifies the measurable outcomes related to the goal. Some details provided and measurements somewhat support goal. | Student accurately and thoroughly identifies measurable outcomes. Thorough details provided and measurements support goal. | 0 | 20% | 0.00 |
| AGREED | Student does not attempt to identify the main parties involved. | Student minimally identifies main parties involved. | Student accurately identifies several main parties involved but lacks critical application. | Student demonstrates critical application by accurately and thoroughly identifying main parties involved. | 0 | 20% | 0.00 |
| REALISTIC / TIME BOUND | Student attempts to identify the whether or not the goal is achieveable and the time frame for achievement. Student does not use evidence to support ideas. | Student identifies whether or not the goal is achieveable and time frame for achievement. Student uses minimal evidence to support ideas. | Student attempts to discuss whether or not the goal is achieveable and provides a specific time frame for achievement. Student minimally uses evidence to support ideas. | Student accurately and thoroughly discusses whether or not the goal is achieveable and a specific time frame for achievement. Student accurately and thoroughly uses evidence to support ideas. | 0 | 20% | 0.00 |
| EVALUATE / REASSESS | Student attempts to identify evaluation measures and changes to be made. Lacks sufficient details and insights. | Student accurately identifies the evaluation measures and changes to be made. Lacks details and/or insights. | Student attempts to discuss with minimal detail the evaluation measures and changes to be made. May lack details and/or insights | Student accurately and thoroughly discusses the evaluation measures and changes to be made. Reflects deep insights. | 0 | 20% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | | 100% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | Final Score | | 0 |
| | | | | | Percentage | | 0.00% |
| Feedback: | | | 4 |
barrrbattouly
NSG290-GradingRubric-Module2Assignment.xlsx
