Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table - Rubric

Finalized PICOT Question 2.5 points

Criteria Description

Finalize a PICOT question.

5. Target 2.5 points

A finalized PICOT question is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 2.23 points

A finalized PICOT question is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 1.98 points

A finalized PICOT question is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 1.88 points

A finalized PICOT question is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A finalized PICOT question is missing.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Literature Search Strategy Employed 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research

articles.

5. Target 3.5 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find

research articles is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 3.12 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find

research articles is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 2.77 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find

research articles is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 2.63 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find

research articles is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find

research articles is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

APA References 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA

format and include a working link or GCU permalink.

5. Target 3.5 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in

APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable 3.12 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in

APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 2.77 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in

APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 2.63 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in

APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in

APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Purpose/Aim of Study 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the purpose or aim of each study.

5. Target 3.5 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable 3.12 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 2.77 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 2.63 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Research questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative) 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Identify the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study.

5. Target 3.5 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is

thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable 3.12 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is mostly

detailed.

3. Approaching 2.77 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is present

but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 2.63 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is

inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is

missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Design 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Explain the type of qualitative study design.

5. Target 3.5 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable 3.12 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 2.77 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 2.63 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Setting 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Identify where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient

versus outpatient, etc.).

5. Target 3.5 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the

setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable 3.12 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the

setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 2.77 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the

setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is present, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 2.63 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the

setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the

setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Sample 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Explain the number and characteristics of participants in the study.

5. Target 3.5 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is

thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable 3.12 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is

mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 2.77 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is

present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 2.63 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is

inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is

missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Methods 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the interventions and instruments of each study.

5. Target 3.5 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is thorough and

detailed.

4. Acceptable 3.12 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 2.77 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is present but

lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 2.63 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is inaccurate or

incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Analysis 4.5 points

Criteria Description

Explain how the data collected from each study was analyzed.

5. Target 4.5 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is thorough

and detailed.

4. Acceptable 4.01 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is mostly

detailed.

3. Approaching 3.56 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is present

but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 3.38 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is

inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Outcomes/Key Findings 5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing

practices (summary of study results).

5. Target 5 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for

nursing practices (summary of study results is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable 4.45 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for

nursing practices (summary of study results is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 3.95 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for

nursing practices (summary of study results is present, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 3.75 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for

nursing practices (summary of study results is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for

nursing practices (summary of study results) is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Recommendations 5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the recommendations from each study.

5. Target 5 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable 4.45 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 3.95 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 3.75 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Connection to PICOT Question and Capstone Change Project 5 points

Criteria Description

Explain how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone

Change Project.

5. Target 5 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and

Capstone Change Project is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable 4.45 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and

Capstone Change Project is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 3.95 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and

Capstone Change Project is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 3.75 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and

Capstone Change Project is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and

Capstone Change Project is missing.

Total 50 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.