Capstone Project Change Proposal
Sashells1986
NRS-465Rubric-Benchmark-CapstoneProjectChangeProposal.pdf
Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal - Rubric
Revision Evident 8 points
Criteria Description
Revisions are incorporated as directed by instructor.
5. Target 8 points
All revisions are incorporated. The revision greatly improves the accuracy and clarity of the project.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
The key aspects were revised. The revision generally improves the accuracy and clarity of the project.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
Most key aspects were revised. Some aspects are still vague or contain minor inaccuracies.
2. Insufficient 6 points
Revision is incomplete. Many aspects are still incomplete, inaccurate, or unclear.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Revision is omitted.
Collapse All
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Background 8 points
Criteria Description
Include the background of the clinical problem.
5. Target 8 points
The background of the clinical problem is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
The background of the clinical problem is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
The background of the clinical problem is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient 6 points
The background of the clinical problem is inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The background of the clinical problem is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Clinical Problem Statement (B) 8 points
Criteria Description
Include the clinical problem statement. (C4.2)
5. Target 8 points
The clinical problem statement is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
The clinical problem statement is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
The clinical problem statement is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient 6 points
The clinical problem statement is inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The clinical problem statement is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Purpose 8 points
Criteria Description
Explain the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care
system.
5. Target 8 points
An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing
health care system is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing
health care system is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing
health care system is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient 6 points
An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing
health care system is inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
An explanation of the purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing
health care system is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
PICOT Question 8 points
Criteria Description
Provide the PICOT question and details.
5. Target 8 points
PICOT question is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
PICOT question is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
PICOT question is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient 6 points
PICOT question is inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
PICOT question is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Literature Search Strategy 8 points
Criteria Description
Explain the literature search strategy employed in the student's project.
5. Target 8 points
An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student's project is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student's project is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student's project is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient 6 points
An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student's project is inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
An explanation of the literature search strategy employed in the student's project is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Synthesis of Literature Review 8 points
Criteria Description
Describe the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student's project.
5. Target 8 points
A synthesis of themes of literature is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
A synthesis of themes of literature is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
A synthesis of themes of literature is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient 6 points
A synthesis of themes of literature is inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A synthesis of themes of literature is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Applicable Change or Nursing Theory (B) 8 points
Criteria Description
Describe the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student's project. (C1.3)
5. Target 8 points
A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student's project is thorough and
accurate.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student's project is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student's project is present but lacks
detail.
2. Insufficient 6 points
A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student's project is inaccurate or
incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A description of the applicable change or nursing theory utilized in the student's project is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures 16 points
Criteria Description
Describe the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.
5. Target 16 points
A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 14.24 points
A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 12.64 points
A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient 12 points
A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Evaluation Nursing Intervention (B) 16 points
Criteria Description
Outline plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention. (C2.5)
5. Target 16 points
An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 14.24 points
An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 12.64 points
An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient 12 points
An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
An outline of the plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Potential Barriers 8 points
Criteria Description
Identify potential barriers to plan implementation, and discuss how these could be overcome.
5. Target 8 points
An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be
overcome are thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be
overcome are mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be
overcome are present but lack detail.
2. Insufficient 6 points
An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be
overcome are inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
An identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and a discussion of how these could be
overcome are missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Appendix 8 points
Criteria Description
Appendix
5. Target 8 points
Appendix is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable 7.12 points
Appendix is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
Appendix is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient 6 points
Appendix is inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appendix is missing.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose 11.2 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target 11.2 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific
audience.
4. Acceptable 9.97 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is
demonstrated.
3. Approaching 8.85 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is
limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2. Insufficient 8.4 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended
audience.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion 11.2 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
5. Target 11.2 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization
or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable 9.97 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion
aligns to the development of the purpose.
3. Approaching 8.85 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and
unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient 8.4 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas
are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing
or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Evidence 9.6 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
5. Target 9.6 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
4. Acceptable 8.54 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3. Approaching 7.58 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other
perspectives is present.
2. Insufficient 7.2 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of
the writer.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 9.6 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target 9.6 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 8.54 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching 7.58 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure
is attempted.
2. Insufficient 7.2 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence
structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence
structure errors are found throughout.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation 6.4 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations,
footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 6.4 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable 5.7 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 5.06 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient 4.8 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of
sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 160 points
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
